Difference between revisions of "Team:Aachen/Notebook"

Line 1,271: Line 1,271:
 
We continued our experiments by performing a skim milk assay on agar plates. Therefore, we poured LB skim milk agar plates containing IPTG and the needed antibiotic and streaked the <i>E. coli</i> BL21 cells containing the plasmid with the expression system.
 
We continued our experiments by performing a skim milk assay on agar plates. Therefore, we poured LB skim milk agar plates containing IPTG and the needed antibiotic and streaked the <i>E. coli</i> BL21 cells containing the plasmid with the expression system.
  
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/fb/T--Aachen--labbook_ecoli_skim_milk_native.png"/></center>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/fb/T--Aachen--labbook_ecoli_skim_milk_native.png" style="width:600px;"/></center>
  
 
<figcaption style="text-align:center; font-size: 15px; padding-left:2cm;padding-right:2cm; "><b>Figure 1: Skim milk plates assay.</b> Cells containing the empty backbone (left) and cells containing the expression system for native subtilisin E (right) after incubation for 3 days at 30°C.</figcaption>
 
<figcaption style="text-align:center; font-size: 15px; padding-left:2cm;padding-right:2cm; "><b>Figure 1: Skim milk plates assay.</b> Cells containing the empty backbone (left) and cells containing the expression system for native subtilisin E (right) after incubation for 3 days at 30°C.</figcaption>
Line 1,639: Line 1,639:
 
Fortunately, we were able to contact members of the former iGEM team Texas, Austin from 2014 who originally created the part BBa_K1416000. They sent us the ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair in a backbone that carries a gentamycin resistance and is replicated with an ori that is not part of the same incompatibility group as the ori of pSB1C3.
 
Fortunately, we were able to contact members of the former iGEM team Texas, Austin from 2014 who originally created the part BBa_K1416000. They sent us the ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair in a backbone that carries a gentamycin resistance and is replicated with an ori that is not part of the same incompatibility group as the ori of pSB1C3.
  
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/80/T--Aachen--ecoli_labbook_texas_plasmid.PNG"/><center>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/80/T--Aachen--ecoli_labbook_texas_plasmid.PNG" style="width:600px;"/><center>
 
<figcaption style="text-align:center; font-size: 15px; padding-left:2cm;padding-right:2cm; "><b>Figure 1: Schematic representation of the recieved tRNA/synthetase pair in its backbone.</b> Graphic obtained through iGEM team Texas, Austin 2014.</figcaption>
 
<figcaption style="text-align:center; font-size: 15px; padding-left:2cm;padding-right:2cm; "><b>Figure 1: Schematic representation of the recieved tRNA/synthetase pair in its backbone.</b> Graphic obtained through iGEM team Texas, Austin 2014.</figcaption>
  

Revision as of 12:43, 18 October 2016

Welcome to iGEM Aachen 2016

Lab Book

To express a photocaged protease in our case subtilisin E, we developed three lab strategies. Their milestones can be seen below in three different timelines, one for every sub-division. Details about reaching these milestones will become visible, if you click on the corresponding circles. On the page "Project Idea" the theory beneath our lab work is described and on the subpage "Protocols & Methods" the exact protocols can be seen, if you would like to repeat the experiments.



Expression of subtilisin E


As the first step to reach our aim of producing an inactive photocaged Subtilisin E variant, which can be activated by light, we researched on the recombinant expression of Subtilisin E in S. cerevisiae . The native Subtilisin E is a gene of Bacillus subtilis which we could receive from the institute. In the following steps our procedures can be traced.

Determination of Parameters


Strain selection

S. cervisiae
* the Synthetase is made for this strand
* needs to have the deficiencies of both chosen vectors

Characterization of strand [1]

Name Auxotrophies Prototrophies Mating Type
CENPK2-1D his3D1; leu2-3_112; ura3-52; trp1-289 MAL2-8c; SUC2 MATalpha

Growth – temperature
We tested the growth in different temperatures for optimization:

Temperature OD at start OD after 24 h
25°C 0 0
30°C 0 >2
37°C 0 0

The S. Cerevisiae strand only grew at 30°C.

Growth – media
As our CENPK2-1D strand was growing poorly in the SC-U medium, we got the advice to try the same medium but with a higher amount of amino acids (SD-U).

Medium OD at start OD after 24 h
SC-U 0,063 2,914
SC-U 0,072 9,14

After OD measurements it was obvious, that the SD-U medium gave the CENPK2-1D better conditions for growth

Growth  – protection against contamination
To prevent bacterial contaminations, we made a comparison of the growth of our used strand in medium with and without ampicillin.

Medium OD at start OD after 24 h
YPD 0 2,725
YPD+Amp 0 2,61

The growth in both media seems equal. So we decided to only use medium with additional ampicillin in future.

Selection of vector

Requirements for vector

1. Secretion
Subtilisin E must be secreted as we do not know it it can be expressed active in cytoplasm for industry secretion is a big advantage as it allow continuos productoin

2. Shuttle vector
For amplifying the vector easily it needs to have an ori and selective marker in E. coli

3. Selection System in yeast different than Synthetase Plasmid
Auxotrphy must be different from trytophane

Available vector for us:

Figure 1: pTEF-MF

Figure 2: pYes2

Figure 3: pcfb255 [2]

Vector pTEF-MF pYES2 pCFP255 [2] pYES2Mfalpha pCFP255MfalphaTEF1 pESC-Trp
selection in S. cerevisiae ura3 ura3 ura3 ura3 ura3 trp
selection in E. coli Amp Amp Amp Amp Amp Amp
Secretiont yes no no yes yes no
Genome Integration no no yes no yes no
Length 6,6 kb 5,9 kb - 6,2 kb - 6,5 kb
Promoter TEF1 GAL TEF1 GAL TEF1 GAL



References

[1]http://www.euroscarf.de/plasmid_details.php?accno=30000B [2]Jensen et al. (2013). “EasyClone: method for iterative chromosomal integration of multiple genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae” FEMS Yeast Research 14(2): 238-248. Provided by Irina Borodina, Technical University of Denmark

Cloning


Cloning of Subtilisin E Gene from Bacillus subtilis into an E. coli - S. cerevisiae shuttle vector

In the beginning we received the PHY300PKL plasmid with the Subtilisin E gene. We chose an uracil deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strand and a shuttle vector carrying the URA gene. The vector has the secretion tag MF alpha to make harvesting of produced protein more convenient. After cloning the Subtilisin E gene into the vector in Escherichia coli we want to transform it in S. cerevisiae and make a test expression. A scheme of the cloning can be seen below:


Figure 1: scheme of cloning the bacillus gene for Subtilisin E into pTEF-MF

For the detailed labbook entries see this PDF.

Cloning of Codon Optimized Subtilisin E in pTEF-MF
As the test expression of the Subtilisin E gene from bacillus subtilis was not successful we used a codon optimized variant of the gene we had on the PHY300PKL plasmid. As a host we chose the S. Cerevisiae strand CENPK2-1D again as it has the deficiencies we need for selection. As a vector backbone we tried the pTEF-MF vector again. A scheme of the cloning can be seen below:


Figure 1: scheme of cloning the codon optimized gene for Subtilisin E into pTEF-MF

For the detailed labbook entries see this PDF.

Cloning into the inducible vector pYes2
After day 10 of cloning the codon optimized Subtilisin E into pTEF-MF we tried a parallel strategy in the PYES2 vector. A scheme of the cloning can be seen below:


Figure 1: scheme of cloning the codon optimized gene for Subtilisin E with MFalpha into pYES2

For the detailed labbook entries see this PDF.

Genome Integration (pCFB255) [1]

After codon optimisation we planned to have the subtilisin E inside an integrative vector pCFB255 [1] for better expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
For the detailed labbook entries see this PDF.



References

[1]Jensen et al. (2013). “EasyClone: method for iterative chromosomal integration of multiple genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae” FEMS Yeast Research 14(2): 238-248. Provided by Irina Borodina, Technical University of Denmark

Test Expression


Introduction
After cloning the Subtilisin E into the vectors pTEF-MF, pyes2 and the genome integration vector pCfB255 [1] a test expression was made. We used the following methods to test for proteolytic activity:

Skim Milk assay
The skim milk assay is a non specific test for proteolytic activity. Lysis of casein leads to a clear solution while the solution remains white when the proteolytic activity is missing.

AAPF assay
The AAPF assay is a very specific test for proteolytic activity in serine proteases

TCA precipitation
It is used to precipitate proteins from cell culture supernatant to gain a higher concentration.

SDS gel
An SDS gel can be used to make proteins visible. SDS (Sodiumdodecyl-sulfate) charges all proteins negative, so that they migrate in an electric field. It is a size based sorting method.

Results in pTEF-MF
In the pTEF-MF the secretion tag MFalpha should lead to a secretion. We tested the supernatant of 24h, 48h and 72h cultures with the methods described above but did not get any positive results. We also crushed the cells to test them with the same methods after 24h, 48h and 72h but there was no positive result either. Subtilisin E expression was not possible in this expression system.

Results in pyes2
In the pyes2 vector with additional MFalpha secretion tag Subtilsin E also should be secreted. We tested the vector like pTEF-MF except we induced it first with 20 % Galactose and fed 20 % again after every 24h.

Results in pcfB255[1]
Tests were performed just like the pTEF-MF, but also genome integration did not result in secretion of an active protease.


References
[1]Jensen et al. (2013). “EasyClone: method for iterative chromosomal integration of multiple genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae” FEMS Yeast Research 14(2): 238-248. Provided by Irina Borodina, Technical University of Denmark.

SDM Ser to UAG



Introduction
To make insertion of the DMNB-serine into the enzyme possible, an amber stop codon has to be at the respective site. In order to achieve this, we made a quikchange of our gene.

For all agarose gels we used 1% agarose and 1 kb Thermo scientific ladder 08:


Day 1

SDM Subtilsin E: Serine 221 to amber codon
We made a SDM with YP0010 and YP0011. As template we used 1µl of sequenced Subtilisin E in pTEF-MF (day 14 from cloning of Subtilisin E gene from Bacillus subtilis) with a concentration of 13,6 ng/µl per 50 µl reaction.

Programm 1 (cycles: 3)

ID 98°C 30 sec
D 98°C 10 sec
A 65-74°C 45 sec
E 72°C 6 min
S 8°C storage

Programm 2 (cylces: 15)

ID 98°C 30 sec
D 98°C 10 sec
A 65-74°C 45 sec
E 72°C 5 min
FE 72°C 10 min
S 8°C storage

We used colums 4-9

Colum 4 5 6 7 8 9
Temperature 66,4°C 67,4°C 68,6°C 69,8°C 71°C 72,1°C

Agarose Gel
We made an agarose gel to see if our modified Subtilsin E was amplified with the primers. The expected size is 7700bp.


1:  PCR product of column 4
2:  PCR-product of column 5
3:  PCR-product of column 6
4:  PCR-product of column 7
5:  PCR-product of column 8
6:  PCR-product of column 9
0:  ladder

There are clear bands at all the six annealing temperatures, so the PCR worked well.

DPN1 Digestion
We did a DPN1 digestion overnight of the quik change products.

Day 2

PCR-Clean-Up
We made a PCR-clean-up of the DPN1 digested products to prepare them for transformation in E. coli Dh5alpha.

Transformation in DH5alpha
We transformed the purified SDM product into E. coli DH5 alpha and plated them on LB + Amp plates.

Day 3

Transformation Results
The transformation was successful.

Overnights
We made overnights of 4 of the grown colonies in 5 ml LB + Ampicillin.

Day 4

Plasmid Isolation
We isolated the plasmids of the quikchanged Subtilisin E in pTEF-MF overnights.

Nanodrop
We measured the concentration of isolated plasmids via nanodrop:
1.  912,6 ng/µl
2.   910 ng/µl
3.   866 ng/µl
4.   660,4 ng/µl

Sequencing
We sent the four samples of isolated plasmids in for sequencing with YP0007, YP0008 and YP0009.

Day 5

Sequencing Results
All four samples showed the right sequence.

Results

We did not continue after this step as the Subtilisin E expression did not work.

Test Expression


As our previous efforts did not produce usable results, we did not reach this point.

Expression of Synthetase


Determination of Parameters


Strain selection

S. cervisiae
* Synthetase is made for this strand
* needs to have the deficiencies of both chosen vectors

Name Auxotrophies Prototrophies Mating Type
CENPK2-1D his3D1; leu2-3_112; ura3-52; trp1-289 MAL2-8c; SUC2 MATalpha

Vector selection

The lab of Peter G. Schultz kindly sent us the plasmid carrying the genes for the tRNA/Synthetase pair (pESCTrpLeuRSBH5T252A) orthogonal in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae and capable of integration the photolabile unnatural amino acid 4,5-Dimethoxy-2-nitrobenzyl-serine.

Check genes


For all agarose gels we used 1% agarose and 1kb Thermo scientific ladder 08

Day 1

Transformation
Unfortunately, the tube was open upon receipt and no traces of dried DNA material were visible. Thus it was decided to transfer competent cells directly into the tube during the process of transformation in E. coli DH5.

Day 2

Overnights
We made 5 ml LB + Amp overnight cultures of 3 different colonies grown on yesterday’s transformation plates, respectively.

Day 3

Cryo Cultures and Plasmid Isolation
We prepared cryo cultures with 1 ml of yesterday´s overnights and isolated the plasmids from the remaining culture. Nanodrop
We measured the concentration of the isolated plasmids: 1. 202 ng/µl 2. 214 ng/µl 3. 263 ng/µl
Control Digest
The plasmid was digested with EcoRI and checked on an agarose gel.

1: Colony 1 2: Colony 2 3: Colony 3 0: Ladder

Day 4

Preparation of competent yeast cells
We prepared competent cells out of a Saccharomyces CENPK21D strand

Day 5

Transformation of pESCTrpLeuRSBH5T252A into Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
We transformed pESCTrpLeuRSBH5T252A into an Uracil and Tryptophan deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strand (CENPK21D).

Day 8

Transformation Results
The transformation grew but at the control plates where untransformed competent cells where plated on SD-Trp medium also a few colonies grew with no obvious reason. Overnight Culture
5 ml Overnight cultures of 5 of the cultures derived from the transformations two days ago were made in SD-U medium with ampicillin.

Day 9

Cryo Cultures and Plasmid Isolation
We prepared cryo cultures with 1 ml of yesterday´s overnights and isolated the plasmids from the remaining culture. As an alternate first step the yeast cell walls were lysed with beads by vortexing cultures in buffer with them for 30 minutes instead of the bacterial lysis buffer.
Nanodrop
We measured the concentration of the isolated plasmids 1 400 ng/µl 2 316,7 ng/µl
Agarose Gel
The isolated plasmids were digested with EcoRI and put on a gel.


S = Synthetase plasmid for control 1-4 = Colony 1-4 0 = Ladder
No plasmids were visible. Advice from our advisors who worked with yeast suggested that we transformed the plasmids we isolated into E. coli for amplification and then look at it on a gel again.

Day 10

Transformation
The isolated plasmids the yeast cells were transformed into E. coli DH5.

Day 11

Overnights
Overnights of two colonies from yesterday’s transformation were made.

Day 12

Plasmid Isolation + Cryos
We made cryo cultures from yesterday’s overnights and isolated plasmids from the remaining culture. Nanodrop
The concentration of the isolated plasmids was measured with a nanodrop: 1. 807,8 ng/ul 2. 815,5 ng/ul Digestion
We to cut the samples 2a-4b plus the control vectors with confirmed sequence with EcoRI.
Agarose Gel
Oddly, the agarose gel shows that the plasmids are not at the expected size.


3a, 3b: isolated plasmids 1 + 2 CSyn: Control (synthetase plasmid) (other slots are not relevant for this section)

Sequencing
We sent the original plasmids for sequencing with primers YP0022 and YP0023, that bind to the respective promotors and primers to find out the sequence of the plasmid, as this was not given to us along with the plasmid. We hoped to find out what went wrong in the transformation process into yeast like this. Also we contacted a research group, who worked with this plasmid for sequences of primers, as we could not reach the group we originally obtained it from, and got YP0016b, YP0017b, YP0018b and YP0019b. With these we also sequenced.

Day 13

Results
The sequencing revealed that what we did not have the plasmid we expected as the primers did not bind and our efforts to receive the right sequence of this plasmids somewhere were unsuccessful. As we had no way to control, if what we were working with was the right thing and without mutations, we sadly could not use the synthetase in our work.

Test Expression


Co-transformation


As our previous efforts did not produce usable results, we did not reach this point.

Test Expression


As our previous efforts did not produce usable results, we did not reach this point.

Test Photocleavage and Activity


As our previous efforts did not produce usable results, we did not reach this point.

New BioBrick Secretion Tag


As our efforts to express Subtilisin E in S. Cerevisiae did not show success, we tried to create a new protein secretion tag (Mfalpha) for S. Cerevisiae as biobrick. Therefore, we used an existing fluorescence biobrick mCherry for S. Cerevisiae (BBa_E2060) and cloned it after our secretion tag Mfalpha. A scheme of the cloning can be seen below:

Figure 1: scheme of cloning MFalpha (BBa_K2020026) and mCherry (BBa_E2060) into the pYES2 inducible vector


For more detailed labbook entries see this PDF.



Expression of subtilisin E in E. coli


Our aim here was to express the natural subtilisin E in E. coli and to determine the optimal conditions.

Building the expression system


Day 1

Our aim was to create a functional expression system for subtilisin E in Escherichia coli. At first, we had to optimize the sequence of the subtilisin E gene from Bacillus subtilis for Escherichia coli codon usage. For this purpose, our DNA sequence was improved with the DNA and protein sequence analysis tool ‘Geneious’ and the ‘Codon Optimization Tool’ from IDT. In the following, we proceeded to design the expression system digitally.

The expression system consists of commonly used BioBricks:

Figure 1: Visualization of the system designed for the expression of subtilisin E in E. coli

Sub-part BioBrick number
Additional basepairs
BioBrick prefix
Promoter BBa_R0011
Ribosome-binding site BBa_B0034
Secretion tag pelB BBa_J32015
Pro-peptide  +  subtilisin E BBa_K2020000
Terminator BBa_B0010
BioBrick suffix
Additional basepairs

This construct was ordered at IDT as a gblock and named ‘EI0002’.

We decided to use the pSB1C3-backbone from iGEM. To amplify the backbone, we transformed BBa_J04450 (RFP expression system in a pSB1C3 backbone) in Escherichia coli BL21.

Figure 3: BBa_J04450 in pSB1C3. Picture taken from the Registry

Day 2

The ordered DNA sequence EI0002 was resuspended to a concentration of 20 ng/µL and amplified via PCR with the primers shown below.

Figure 4: Amplification of EI0002.

Multiple identical samples were prepared.

temperature duration cycles
Initial denaturation 98°C 30s
Denaturation 98°C 10s 24 cycles
Annealing Gradient from 55°C to 65°C 30s
Elongation 72°C 90s
Final elongation 72°C 10min
Figure 5: sPCR program.

Afterwards, the size of the PCR products was examined via agarose-gelelectrophoresis.

Figure 6: Agarose gel picture. PCR-amplified insert (column 1-12), DNA ladder #SM0312.

As all samples showed the correct size, the DNA concentration was increased by purification of multiple samples through one column during PCR clean-up.
In addition to this, multiple overnight cultures of 5 mL were prepared with the plates of the transformation from BBa_J04450 in E. coli BL21 from the day before. As controls, overnight cultures with E. coli BL21 wildtype were prepared, with and also without addition of antibiotic.

Day 3

Growth?
Ligation product Yes
Control 1: BL21 WT with antibiotic No
Control 2: BL21 WT without antibiotic Yes
Figure 7: Results of the overnight cultures. All controls were correct.

We prepared cryo cultures of the overnight cultures of BBa_J04450 in E. coli BL21 and isolated the plasmids from the cells for further experiments.

Day 4

In the following, we cloned the PCR-amplified, linear expression system EI0002 from day 1 into the pSB1C3 backbone of BBa_J04450. Both samples were digested with the enzymes EcoRI and PstI. After that, the samples were ligated for one hour at room temperature and then transformed into E. coli BL21. All controls were prepared according to the protocol.

Day 5

Growth?
EI0002 in pSB1C3 Yes
Control 1: dephosphorylated backbone No
Control 2: RFP Yes
Control 3: BL21 WT without insert No
Figure 8: Transformation results. All controls were correct.

To find a successfully ligated plasmid, we screened 24 colonies via Colony PCR with primers that bind outside of the insert to pSB1C3 and in parallel prepared overnight cultures of the same colonies. The samples were tested via agarose-gelelectrophoresis after the PCR.

Figure 9: Agarose gel picture of the colony-PCR. PCR-amplified insert (column 1-12), DNA ladder #SM0312, positive clones can be seen at the top in column 1, 11 and 12

A few colonies showed the correct size and were therefore used for further experiments. The overnight cultures of all negative colonies were discarded.

Day 6

Growth?
EI0002 in pSB1C3 Yes
Control 1: BL21 WT with antibiotic No
Control 2: BL21 WT without antibiotic Yes
Control 3: BL21 WT without insert No
Figure 10: Results of the overnight cultures. All controls were correct.

We prepared cryo cultures of the overnight cultures of the ligation product in E. coli BL21 and isolated the plasmids from the cells. The purified plasmids were sent in for sequencing.

Day 7

All sequenced samples show fatal mutations. Either frameshifts in the coding sequence or multiple deletions in the promoter occurred.
Despite repeating the experiment above multiple times, we were not able to obtain an expression system for subtilisin E without fatal mutations. Combined with the experience of other iGEM teams that the promoter BBa_R0011 shows some degree of expression before the addition of the inducer, we assumed that subtilisin E prohibits cell growth of E. coli if expressed in its active form.
As a result, we progressed by exchanging the promoter.

Day 8

To exchange to promoter of our expression system, we started with extracting parts of it via PCR. Hence, we used the primers shown below to obtain a sequence with the secretion tag, the subtilisin E gene and a terminator that is flanked by the BioBrick prefix and suffix.

Figure 11: Extraction of a part of the expression system via PCR.

Afterwards, we cloned this sequence in the BioBrick BBa_J04500 with the restriction sites EcoRI and PstI. BBa_J04500 is a protein expression backbone which consists of the lacI promoter BBa_R0010 and the ribosome-binding site BBa_B0034 integrated in the BioBrick standard vector pSB1C3. Then, we transformed the obtained construct in E. coli BL21 together with all needed controls.

Day 9

Growth?
PCR extracted sequence in BBa_J04500 Yes
Control 1: dephosphorylated backbone No
Control 2: RFP Yes
Control 3: BL21 WT without inser No
Figure 12: Transformation results. All controls were correct.

We prepared 5ml overnight cultures of the colonies and the usual controls.

Day 10

Growth?
PCR extracted sequence in BBa_J04500 Yes
Control 1: BL21 WT with antibiotic No
Control 2: BL21 WT without antibiotic Yes
Figure 13: Results of the overnight cultures. All controls were correct.

At first, we prepared cryo cultures of the overnight cultures and then isolated the plasmids from the cells. In the following, we linearized the purified plasmids with EcoRI and tested their size via agarose-gelelectrophoresis.

Figure 14: Agarose gel picture of expression system with new promoter. Ligation products (column 1-5), DNA ladder #SM0312. Positive clones can be seen in column 3, 4 and 5.

The samples with the correct size were sent in for sequencing.

Testing the Expression


Day 1

For the analysis of the expression level we needed an empty backbone control. Hence, we digested BBa_J04450 with XbaI and SpeI and ligated the sample without addition of a further insert. The ligation product was then transformed in E. coli BL21.

Day 2

Growth?
Empty backbone Yes
Control 2: RFP Yes
Control 3: BL21 WT without insert No
Figure 1: Transformation results. All controls were correct.

Some colonies of the ligation product appeared to be pink. This was only possible due to a re-ligation of the RFP-expression cassette into pSB1C3. Therefore, these colonies weren’t used for further experiments. Only white colonies were used for the preparation of 5ml overnight cultures.

Growth?
Empty backbone Yes
Control 1: BL21 WT with antibiotic No
Control 2: BL21 WT without antibiotic Yes
Figure 2: Results of the overnight cultures. All controls were correct.

We prepared cryo cultures of the overnights of the empty backbone and purified the plasmids from the cells. Afterwards, we checked the size of the plasmids via agarose-gelelectrophoresis.

Figure 3: Agarose gel picture of the empty backbone pSB1C3 (column 1-2). DNA ladder #SM0312. Both clones are positive.

One of the samples that showed the correct size was sent in for sequencing.

Day 4

One of the samples of the PCR extracted expression system in BBa_J04500 that was sequenced beforehand and also the sample with the empty backbone showed the correct sequence and could therefore be used for further experiments.
To analyze the expression level of subtilisin E we prepared 20ml pre-cultures of the positive sample. In addition, we prepared pre-cultures of the E. coli BL21 wildtype and the pSB1C3 empty backbone in E. coli BL21 as controls.

Day 5

The pre-cultures from the day before were used to inoculate two 50ml main-cultures each to an OD600 of 0.1. This main-cultures were then incubated at 37°C, 250 rpm until OD 0.3 was reached. Then, the main-cultures were induced by adding 0.5mM IPTG. Afterwards, one of the main-cultures was incubated at 30°C and the other at 25°C. We took samples of 500µL hourly and continued the incubation overnight.

Day 6

We took one sample of each main-culture from the day before and then lysed all samples in a sonication bath for about 30 minutes. The supernatant and the pellet of these samples were then tested separately via SDS-gelelectrophoresis.
Unfortunately, we were not able to obtain any clear results from the SDS gel and thus could not verify the expression of subtilisin E.

Testing the folding and activity


Day 1

We continued our experiments by performing a skim milk assay on agar plates. Therefore, we poured LB skim milk agar plates containing IPTG and the needed antibiotic and streaked the E. coli BL21 cells containing the plasmid with the expression system.

Figure 1: Skim milk plates assay. Cells containing the empty backbone (left) and cells containing the expression system for native subtilisin E (right) after incubation for 3 days at 30°C.

Comparing the clearance of the skim milk plates, a proteolytic activity could be proven for the cells containing the expression system for native subtilisin E. As a results, we concluded that within three days these cells are able to produce the native protease which will then digest the skim milk in the agar plates, resulting in a clearance.

Conclusion

We were able to express subtilisin E in E. coli in amount high enough to be detected via skim milk assay.

Mutating the expression system


This phase of the project had two aims:
At first, we wanted to show that both the active site and the pro-peptide cleavage site of subtilisin E are essential for the activity of the enzyme. Thus, we planned to exchange both amino acids at the target sites against bigger amino acids and then analyze the activity of the mutated enzyme as a proof of principle.
Our second goal was to mutate our current expression system in order to exchange serine in the active site and tyrosine in the pro-peptide cleavage site against the UAG amber stop codon in preparation for the expression of a photocaged enzyme.

Site-directed mutagenesis


Day 1
To prepare the expression of a photocaged protease and to prove our principle, we performed a site-directed mutagenesis. Four different strategies were pursued:

SDM amino acid DNA amino acid DNA
1. serine  >  tyrosine AGC  >  TAC
2. serine  >  DMNB-serine TAC  >  TAG
3. tyrosine  >  tryptophan TAT  >  TAG
4. tyrosine  >  ONB-tyrosine TAT  >  TGG
Figure 1: Overview of different SDM strategies.

As a proof of principle we exchanged serine in the active site against tyrosine and tyrosine in the pro-peptide cleavage site against tryptophan. In preparation for the expression of a photocaged enzyme we exchanged the codons for the targeted amino acids against the UAG amber stop codon.
To achieve this, we simultaneously performed the site-directed mutagenesis three times (SDM 1, 3 and 4) with fitting primers and our expression system after the exchange of promoters as a template. SDM 2 had to be performed separately and with SDM 1 as a template at a later time.
For SDM 1, 3 and 4 we executed the following PCR:

temperature duration cycles
Initial denaturation 98°C 30s
Denaturation 98°C 10s 3 cycles
Annealing Gradient from 70°C to 90°C 30s
Elongation 72°C 3min 25s
Figure 2: PCR program 1.
temperature duration cycles
Initial denaturation 98°C 30s
Denaturation 98°C 10s 15 cycles
Annealing Gradient from 70°C to 90°C 30s
Elongation 72°C 3min 25s
Final elongation 72°C 10min
Figure 3: PCR program 2.
>

Multiple samples were prepared for each SDM. After completion of both PCR programs the size of all samples was verified via agarose-gelelectrophoresis

Figure 4: Agarose gel pictures of SDM 1 (top), 3 (middle) and 4 (bottom). DNA ladder #SM0312.

As all samples showed the correct size, identical samples were purified through one column during PCR clean-up to increase the DNA concentration.
After that, the DpnI digest was set up and incubated at 37°C overnight.

Day 2

In the beginning we performed a heatkill with the DpnI-digested samples of SDM 1, 3 and 4. Then, all samples were transformed in E. coli BL21 together with all needed controls.
Day 3

Growth?
SDM 1, 3 and 4 Yes
Control 2: RFP Yes
Control 3: BL21 WT without insert No
Figure 5: Transformation results . All controls were correct.

Multiple 5ml overnight cultures were prepared for each SDM approach together with all needed controls.

Day 4

Growth?
SDM 1, 3 and 4 Yes
Control 1: BL21 WT with antibiotic No
Control 2: BL21 WT without antibiotic Yes
Figure 6: Results of the overnight cultures. All controls were correct.

We prepared cryo cultures of the overnight cultures of SDM 1, 3 and 4 in E. coli BL21 and isolated the plasmids from the cells to use them for further experiments. A few samples were sent in for sequencing.

Day 5

The sequencing results showed that we were able to obtain samples with the desired, modified sequence. Hence, we used one sample with a confirmed sequence of SDM 1 as a template for SDM 2. In the following, we executed the following PCR:

temperature duration cycles
Initial denaturation 98°C 30s
Denaturation 98°C 10s 3 cycles
Annealing Gradient from 70°C to 90°C 30s
Elongation 72°C 3min 25s
Figure 7: PCR program 1.
temperature duration cycles
Initial denaturation 98°C 30s
Denaturation 98°C 10s 15 cycles
Annealing Gradient from 70°C to 90°C 30s
Elongation 72°C 3min 25s
Final elongation 72°C 10min
Figure 8: PCR program 2.

Multiple identical samples were prepared. After completion of both PCR programs the size of all samples was verified via agarose-gelelectrophoresis.

Figure 9: Agarose gel picture of expression system plasmid after SDM 2. DNA ladder #SM0312.

As all samples showed the correct size, identical samples were purified through one column during PCR clean-up to increase the DNA concentration.
After that, the DpnI digest was set up and incubated at 37°C overnight.

Day 6

We performed a heatkill with the DpnI-digested samples of SDM 2. Then, the sample was transformed in E. coli BL21 together with all needed controls.

Day 7

Growth?
SDM 2 Yes
Control 2: RFP Yes
Control 3: BL21 WT without insert No
Figure 10: Transformation results. All controls were correct.

Multiple 5ml overnight cultures were prepared together with all needed controls.

Day 8

Growth?
SDM 2 Yes
Control 1: BL21 WT with antibiotic No
Control 2: BL21 WT without antibiotic Yes
Figure 11: Results of the overnight cultures. All controls were correct.

We prepared cryo cultures of the overnight cultures of SDM 2 in E. coli BL21 and isolated the plasmids from the cells. Some samples were sent in for sequencing.

Day 9

The sequencing results showed that in some samples we successfully modified our expression system with the desired mutations.

Testing the expresion


In the following we wanted to analyze the expression level of the different, mutated versions of subtilisin E.
To express a photocaged enzyme not only a stop codon at the target site is needed but also an orthogonal tRNA/synthetase pair that incorporates the desired non-canonical amino acid in response to the amber stop codon. While targeting the pro-peptide cleavage site, we wanted to use the ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair for E. coli which derives from the tyrosyl-tRNA/synthetase pair from Methanococcus janaschii. This year, the DNA sequence for the ONBY-tRNA/synthetase-pair was available on the iGEM kit plate as BioBrick BBa_K1416000. However, this part was only available in pSB1C3. This means, that the plasmids for both our expression system and the tRNA/synthetase-pair have the same origin of replication and therefore are competing against each other in terms of which of them will be replicated. Therefore, we weren’t able to use the BioBrick BBa_K1416000 for our experiments.
Fortunately, we were able to contact members of the former iGEM team Texas, Austin from 2014 who originally created the part BBa_K1416000. They sent us the ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair in a backbone that carries a gentamycin resistance and is replicated with an ori that is not part of the same incompatibility group as the ori of pSB1C3.

Figure 1: Schematic representation of the recieved tRNA/synthetase pair in its backbone. Graphic obtained through iGEM team Texas, Austin 2014.

This allowed us to use the ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair that is described as BBa_K1416000 without the need of cloning it into a different backbone.

Moreover, the experiments to test the incorporation efficiency of the ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair showed that this pair is also able to incorporate DMNB-serine to a certain degree. This is why we decided to try to incorporate DMNBS in our SDM 4-modified enzyme with this tRNA/synthetase pair.

Day 1

We received the ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair from team Texas, Austin 2014 as dried DNA on filter paper. At first, we cut the marked region from the filter paper, put it in a 1.5ml tube and immersed it in 100µl Tris-HCl pH 8.0. After incubation for 10 minutes, we used 2µl for a transformation in E. coli BL21 and in parallel transformed the usual controls.

Day 2

Growth?
ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair Yes
Control 2: RFP Yes
Control 3: BL21 WT without insert No
Figure 2: Transformation results. All controls were correct.

Multiple 5ml overnight cultures were prepared for each SDM approach together with all needed controls.

Day 3

Growth?
ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair Yes
Control 1: BL21 WT with antibiotic No
Control 2: BL21 WT without antibiotic Yes
Figure 3: Results of the overnight cultures. All controls were correct.

Cryo cultures of the ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair in E. coli BL21 were prepared and we isolated the plasmids from the cells. One sample was sent in for sequencing.

Day 4

The sequencing results showed that the sample had the correct sequence and could therefore be used in further experiments.
In the following we executed a co-transformation in E. coli BL21:
SDM 2-modified expression system and ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair
SDM 4-modified expression system and ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair
During the transformation 2µl of each plasmid sample were used and the cells were plated on LB agar plates with two antibiotics.

Day 5

Growth?
Co-transformation Yes
Control 2: RFP Yes
Control 3: BL21 WT without insert No
Figure 4: Transformation results. All controls were correct.

We prepared multiple 5ml overnight cultures of each co-transformation together with the needed controls.
As the transfer from the solid complex medium to liquid minimal medium causes a high stress-level for the E. coli cells, we intended to change at first from solid complex medium to solid minimal medium and then to liquid minimal medium. Hence, we streaked the same colonies that we used for the overnight cultures on M9 agar plates.

Day 6

Growth?
Co-transformation Yes
Control 1: BL21 WT with antibiotic 1 No
Control 2: BL21 WT with antibiotic 2 No
Control 3: BL21 WT with antibiotic 1 + 2 No
Control 4: BL21 WT without antibiotics Yes
Figure 5: Results of the overnight cultures. All controls were correct.

To back up the co-transformed cells in M9 medium we prepared cryo cultures of the overnight cultures. As the cells were able to grow in medium with two antibiotics, both plasmids must have been successfully transformed into them. As a consequence, these cells can be used for further experiments. Continuing the transfer to liquid minimal media, we prepared 5ml overnight cultures with the positive clones from the M9 agar plates in liquid M9 medium.

Day 7

In the following we wanted to start with the analysis of the expression level. For that reason, we prepared different pre-cultures:
SDM 1-modified expression system in complex media
SDM 2-modified expression system + ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair in minimal media
SDM 3-modified expression system in complex media
SDM 4-modified expression system + ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair in minimal media
Empty backbone pSB1C3 in complex media
Empty backbone pSB1C3 in minimal media
E. coli BL21 wildtype in complex media
E. coli BL21 wildtype in minimal media
All pre-cultures were incubated at 37°C, 250 rpm overnight.

Day 8

We then proceeded to prepare two 50ml main-cultures for each pre-culture from the day before. All main-cultures were prepared with the same medium as the pre-culture. To the cultures with minimal medium we added the non-canonical amino acid solved in 50% DMSO. Also, these cultures had to be handled in the dark after addition of the non-canonical amino acids due to their light-sensitivity.

Main-culture Non-canonical amino acid
SDM 2 + ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair ONB-tyrosine
SDM 4 + ONBY-tRNA/synthetase pair DMNB-serine
Empty backbone pSB1C3 ONB-tyrosine
E. coli BL21 wildtype ONB-tyrosine
Figure 6: Overview of addition of non-canonical amino acids to the main-cultures.

All main-cultures were inoculated to an OD600 of 0.1 and incubated at 37°C, 250 rpm to OD600 0.3. Then, the main-cultures were induced by adding 0.5mM IPTG. Afterwards, one of each type of main-culture was incubated at 30°C and the other at 25°C. We took five identical samples of 500µL of each main-culture hourly and continued the incubation overnight.

Day 9

We took five identical samples of each main-culture from the day before and then lysed all samples with different cell lysis methods:
Lysozyme solution (1h, 37°C, 250 rpm)
Lysozyme solution (1h, 37°C, 250 rpm) + sonication bath (30 minutes)
Sonicator (3 minutes)
Glass beads mill (10 minutes)
The supernatant of these samples was then tested via SDS-gelelectrophoresis. Unfortunately, we were not able to obtain any clear results from the SDS gel and thus could not verify the expression of subtilisin E.

Testing the folding and activity


Day 1

As we were not able to detect the expression of the modified proteases via SDS gel, we proceeded by executing a skim milk assay on agar plates containing IPTG and the needed antibiotics. Therefore, we streaked the cells containing the modified expression systems on these plates and incubated at 30°C for three days.

Figure 1: Skim milk plates assay. Cells containing the empty backbone (1) in comparison to either cells producing the native protease (2), cells with the SDM 1-modified (3) and the SDM 3-modified expression system (4) after incubation for 3 days at 30°C.

Neither the empty backbone nor the SDM 1-modified expression system did seem to cause a proteolytic activity. A clearance and therefore a proteolytic activity could only be observed for the native protease (as demonstrated before) and the SDM 3-modified expression system.
Via SDM 1 we had exchanged the targeted serine in the active site against a bigger amino acid, namely tyrosine. By demonstrating that this modification doesn’t result in a clearance of the skim milk plates, we were now able to prove that serine is essential for the proteolytic activity of the protease and that exchanging it would inactive the enzyme.
SDM 3 had been executed to exchange tyrosine in the pro-peptide cleavage site against tryptophan, a bigger amino acid. As seen on the pictures above, a clearance had occurred for those modified cells and a proteolytic activity could be assumed. Contrary to our former beliefs, it could now be deduced that exchanging tyrosine doesn’t result in a change of activity. Consequently, tyrosine in the pro-peptide cleavage site is not essential for the activity of subtilisin E.

Conclusion

We were able to proof that serine in the active site would result in a loss of activity. Hence, we demonstrated that exchanging serine against a photo-labile, non-canonical amino acid will inactivate subtilisin E and therefore proved the principle of our project.
Unfortunately, we were not able to prove the principle of our project regarding tyrosine in the pro-peptide cleavage site, as it seems to be not essential for the proteolytic activity. Thus, exchanging tyrosine against ONB-tyrosine will not influence the activity of the enzyme.

Photoclevage


Irradiation


Testing the Expression


Testing the folding and activity




Research on screening system. Decision to work with kit from iGEM Team Austin, Texas 2014


Definition of incubation conditions


Arrival and Preparation of Testkit with DNA from Texas
Recovery of plasmids in TRIS buffer pH 8.5, followed by transformation in BL21 DE3 gold, LB solid plates with Gentamycin 30µg/ml.

Determining concentration of antibiotcs in LB
The growth of E.coli cells transformed with plasmids wild type tyrosine -tRNA/synthetase and oNBY-tRNA/synthetase on LB solid as well as in LB liquid is not affected by concentrations of gentamycin up to 30µg/ml, whereas a wild type BL21 DE3 gold is affected already at 5µg/ml. Hence, appropriate concentration for gentamycin plates and cultures is 30µg/ml. This observation is also valid for 50µg/ml Kanamycin tested with transformed reporter plasmids in BL21 DE3 gold.
Furthermore the combination of the two antibiotics is evaluated. Since BL21 DE3 gold showed a proper growth rate in LB with 30µg/ml gentamycin + 50µg/ml Kanamycin when transformed with a reporter plasmid and a synthetase plasmid the assessed concentrations are kept.

Determining concentration of atibiotics in M9 minimal medium
Competent cells already containing the reporter plasmid pFRY are beeing transformed with the PCR product from Site Saturated Mutagenesis 3 onto M9 solid with different antibiotics concentration and afterwards picked in overnight cultures with the same antibiotics concentrations. A gel electrophoresis as well as a colony PCR is made to detect, if the concentration of both antibiotics is high enough to have an appropriate pressure on the cells, but is low enough, so that cultivation of cells is after all possible in minimal medium. The growth on microtiter plates is as well evaluated via plate reader.
Gentamycin 5µg/mg + Kanamycin 50µg/ml is the only concentration where E.coli is growing and reliably keeps both plasmids. As after transformation on M9 solid with Gentamycin 5µg/ml some wild type BL21 colonies grew, gentamycin concentration in M9 solid was increased: Transformation onto Gentymacin 10µg/ml + Kanamycin 50µg/ml and subsequent picking in liquid M9 cultures with Gentymacin 5µg/ml + Kanamycin 50µg/ml resulted in practically no growth of BL21 wild type but in appropriate growth rates of cells transformed with two plasmids.

  • Concentrations used in M9 solid medium with BL21 DE3 gold:
    1. Gentamycin 10 µg/ml
    2. Kanamycin 50 µg/ml
  • Concentrations used in M9 liquid medium with BL21 DE3 gold:
    1. Gentamycin 5 µg/ml and
    2. Kanamycin 10 µg/ml

  • Determining cultivation temperature
    All single and double transformed E.coli cells in LB liquid and solid show an appropriate growth rate at 37°C. Whereas evaluation of growth rates with M9 minimal medium gives better results in 30°C.

    Preparation of chemical competent cells
    A transformation of the reporter plasmid pRXG into BL21 DE3 gold onto LB solid with Gentamycin 30µg/ml is made. Subsequently some colonies are picked for overnight culture. Thereof cryo cultures are prepared as well as the isolated plasmids are sent for sequencing. One cryo culture is used to inoculate several overnight cultures from which competent cells are prepared via TFB-method.

    Results from testing transformation efficiency
    To get a maximum of colonies with transformation of the mutation library, the transformation method is tested as follows: Double transformation with two plasmids, i.e. pFRY and Y-RS, is generally lower in efficiency than single transformation. By a factor of ca. 1000 lower in efficiency to double transformation is double transformation with one plasmid and one PCR product. To have both plasmids in one cell, the best solution is transformation of a PCR product in competent cells which already contain the reporter plasmid pFRY. Colonies appear smaller in comparison to BL21, because they have two additional plasmids resulting in metabolic burden and hence a lower growth rate. Compared to double transformation, the number of cells is higher by a factor of 10. Own competent cells already containing the reporter plasmid have only minimal lower transformation efficiency than BL21 DE3 gold, when transformed with a single plasmid.

    Results from testing various cultivation steps
    As transformation on LB solid with subsequent picking in M9 liquid resulted in almost no growth, proper cell growth is achieved by the following method:

    1. Pick into M9 liquid: Masterplate, growth: 2 days at 30°C, 900rpm,
    2. Replicate into M9 liquid Screening plate, growth 2 days at 30°C, 900 rpm
      1. For positive screening:
        1. Induction with 100 µM IPTG
        2. 2mM DMNBS
      2. For negative screening:
        1. Induction with 100 µM IPTG

    Cryo cultures are made from all intermediate steps.

    DMNBS
    DMNBS is soluble in 50% DMSO at basic pH. A stock of 50mM is prepared and used with a final concentration in M9 at 2mM resulting in a pH value within the medium solution of 7.55.

    Determining growth with DMNBS
    When replicating from a microtiter plate with M9 minimal medium into another with M9 and addition of both antibiotics, 100mM IPTG and 2mM DMNBS it is shown that growth of cells is affected slightly resulting in an elongated growth phase. Cultures reach their maximum cell density after 42-48h of growth.

    Modelling of binding pocket of DMNBS-synthetase


    Extensive research on previously observed mutation spots of different kinds of evaluated synthetases for ncAA as well as on highly conserved amino acids is made. Upon comparison of the crystal structures of EcLeu-tRNA/RS with various mutated tRNA/synthetase pairs eventually the decision is made for mutating wild type Methanoococcus janaschii tyrosyl tRNA/synthetase pair to a DMNBS specificity. Clashes of the synthetase backbone with DMNBS do not occur. Furthermore this pair had been reported to be orthogonal in E.coli. The mutation sites are determined with respect to chemical properties, space for photoprotection group and codon usage. The well working DMNBS-tRNA/synthetase pair derived from Leucyl Ec-tRNA/syntehtase pair is evaluated in order to align mutation spots.

    SDM Site Directed Mutagenesis


    Tyrosine 32 is mutated to glycine in a site directed mutagenesis with a full gradient two step PCR due to it is known H-bonds with former ligand of the tRNA/synthetase tyrosine. Elongation time is set to 50sec/kbp.
    Gel electrophoresis shows a successful amplification at the expected length. Tubes are pooled, cleaned and transformed into E.coli BL21 DE3 gold. Sequencing results show in 4 out of 4 colonies the replacement through glycin.
    (picture Gel SDM)

    Initially it was tried to saturate the remaining 5 mutation sites via a two step Omnichange protocol. It was shown, that, due to the given DNA sequence and the protocol recommendations, the design of one of the primers made the execution of the protocol nearly impossible. As a conseuqence we opted for repeated Single Site Saturation Mutagenesis to reach the goal.

    SSM1 Site Saturation Mutagenesis 1


    As the template for the first Site Saturation Mutagenesis the isolated plasmid from transformation of SDM is used. A partially randomized codon optimized for the codon usage of E.coli within the primer is selected to establish a diversity of amino acids at the mutation site. A full gradient two step PCR with an elongation time of 50sec/kbp is performed on site L65 due to its location within the 2Å radius of DMNBS. The subsequent gel electrophoresis showed the PCR product at expected length.
    (picture Gel SSM1)

    Tubes are pooled and cleaned and the product is transformed into E.coli BL21 DE3 gold. Sequencing of 4 colonies shows in all 4 samples the successful mutation at the SDM1 site to various amino acids as well as the selected glycin codon at position 32.

    SSM2 Site Saturation Mutagenesis 2


    With the purpose of performing Site Saturation muatagenesis the colonies of SSM1 are washed off the transformation plates. The isolated plasmid is used as template for SSM2 at mutation site D158 and I159. The first site is to be mutated due to known H-bonds of the tRNA/synthetase complex with the former ligand tyrosine. Second site has a sidechain which is located within the 2Å radius of DMNBS. Primer contain two partially randomized codons with one base which is left to be unchanged in the middle. A full gradient, two step PCR is performed with an elongation time of 50sec/kbp. Subsequent gel electrophoresis shows a PCR product at the expected length. Tubes are pooled and product is isolated and subsequently transformed into E.coli BL21 DE3 gold. 4 out of 4 colonies are sequencend, where all previous mutation sites showed a glycine codon in SDM position as well as different mutations in various combinations at the three SSM sites.
    (Picture Gel SSM2)

    SSM 3: Site Saturated Mutagenesis 3


    Prior to washing the colonies off the transformation plates it is calculated if the transformation yielded as many colonies as theoretical variants up to SSM2. As counted colonies are twice as much as theoretical variants, colonies are washed off the transformation plates from SSM2. Plasmids are isolated and used as template for Site Saturation Mutagenesis 3. A full gradient two step PCR is performed with 50sec/kbp elongation time. Gel electrophoresis is showing the PCR product to be at the expected length.
    (Picture Gel SSM3)

    Mutation Library


    For purposes of sequencing 12 transformations of the mutation library into BL21 DE3 gold are made and all sample results show different codons in various combinations at all mutation sites, respectively a glycine at position 32.
    As the mutation steps are now finished the pooled and cleaned up PCR product is transformed into the competent cells containing already the reporter plasmid, and is streaked on M9 solid with the assessed concentration of antibiotics for selection. After two days of incubation appropriate colonies are picked into microtiter plates containing M9 liquid and respective antibiotics. Thus over 8000 clones are collected. Following the previous assessment, an intermediate inoculation step was made and subsequently a final inoculation into black microtiter plates with transparent bottom. Induction with 100µM IPTG as well as supplementation of 2mM DMNBS was carried out at the beginning of the cultivation (see results).

    (Picture of diversity of library, screenshot Geneious) .

    Determine measurement conditions and parameter


    Screening


    Analysis