Difference between revisions of "Team:Aachen/InterLab"

Line 32: Line 32:
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
<table align="center" style="width:90%; border-style:solid; border-width: 15px;" >
+
<table align="center" style="width:100%; border-style:solid; border-width: 15px; margin-left: auto;
 +
margin-right: auto;" >
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td>Peak</td>
 
<td>Peak</td>

Revision as of 21:52, 6 October 2016

Welcome to iGEM Aachen 2016

InterLab Study 2016

The 3rd International InterLab Study of the iGEM competition sought to compare the results of certain measurements conducted by on different devices by different scientists in different labs all over the world. In order to have a distinctive set of measurable parameters, the expression of GFP (I13504) under the control of three promotors with different strengths was subject to measurement. The promotors are part of a constitutive promotor family and where constructed by John Anderson in 2006 and added to the iGEM Registry. In this year’s InterLab study the following members of this promotor family where investigated:J23101 (Device 1, strong), J23106 (Device 2, medium) and J23117 (Device 3, weak). As a negative control the TetR repressible promotor (R0040) was used. However, with the positive control we had some issues. Originally the positive control should have been GFP under the control of the J23151 promotor (I20270) but apparently this construct was neither in the InterLab measurement kit (tube was empty) nor in the respective backup well in the distribution (Kit Plate 3, well 8P). We didn´t have the time left to build the positive control from scratch or identify which construct it actually was, but after communication with iGEM HQ we used it anyway.

Results


For the first time we used flow cytometry in order to measure the respective constructs. However, we made some changes to the flow cytometer protocol in order to utilize the know-how for measurements like this already present in our lab. The main changes were that we didn´t use pre- and main cultures and directly used cultures inoculated with the colonies from the construct transformations. Following the incubation, the OD was measured of each culture and an amount of culture was pelleted which would result in an OD of 2 when resuspended in 1 ml PBS. Prior, the measurement the cells where diluted again 1:3 with PBS, filtered through a 100 µm filter (to avoid clocking of the flow cytometer) and then measured with the 530/40(488) channel of the flow cytometer.

Calibration


In order to calibrate the BD Influx Cell Sorter flow cytometer to units of MEFL (molecules of equivalent fluorescence) a sample of SpheroTech RCP-30-5A Rainbow Calibration Particles were used. They are a mixture of different particles with certain numbers of MEFL on them. The measurement of 50000 particles allowed us to connect different MEFL values with their corresponding fluorescence intensity. Table 1 shows fluorescence values for the 8 different MEFL values as well as the conversion value to calculate MEFL from fluorescence after the actual construct measurement:


Peak 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Fluorescence
[530/40(488)]
8 38 122 338 925 2363 5422 9999
MEFL - 692 2192 6028 17493 35674 126907 290983
Conversion - 18,21 17,97 17,83 18,91 15,1 23,41 29,1