Line 226: | Line 226: | ||
section#grupo { | section#grupo { | ||
− | background-image: url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/ | + | background-image:url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/8e/Home_rosea.jpg"); |
− | height: | + | height: 20em; |
background-size: 100%; | background-size: 100%; | ||
background-repeat: no-repeat; | background-repeat: no-repeat; |
Revision as of 15:17, 14 October 2016
After carrying out laboratory work, the way we used to check if our work was successful was through electrophoresis using agarose gel 0.8; 1.2 and 1.5 depending on its need.
Our laboratory work began in June this year and since then, we have been working.
Now, we will see our performance in Lux:
Results
July 8rd: our samples failed to be clear.
July 22nd: Too heated, without result.
July 22rd: the sample was too heated again, and we did not obtained result.
July 23rd: performed in a small chamber gel 1.5, with Plux promoter, not able to see the two expected bands.
July 30th: No result was obtained from all samples, it will be repeated.
August 5th: the expected samples could be clearly seen, the third well tends to have two bands.
August 10th: plasmids concentrates, all the samples were completely able to be seen, getting the expected result.
August 12th: we turned to repeat samples to make sure everything is correct, then the plasmids were sent to cryogenics.