Difference between revisions of "Team:UCL/Results"
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
<h4> We then wanted to see the exact concentration in which the growth is affected so repeated the experiment at smaller increments </h4> | <h4> We then wanted to see the exact concentration in which the growth is affected so repeated the experiment at smaller increments </h4> | ||
| − | + | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/11/UCL_LubeWTsmallerincrements.png" </p> | |
| − | + | ||
<p> Text describing graph like a figure. Error bars were not included as these were negligible at 0.0005 (0.4%). </p> | <p> Text describing graph like a figure. Error bars were not included as these were negligible at 0.0005 (0.4%). </p> | ||
| Line 54: | Line 53: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/c2/UCL_dataLUBE_IrrE.png" </p> | ||
| + | |||
<p> Text describing the graph </p> | <p> Text describing the graph </p> | ||
Revision as of 22:14, 14 October 2016
<!DOCTYPE html>
RESULTS
see our end discussion
IrrE to aid E.coli growth in lube
First we performed a control experiment in which we grew wild-type E.coli in Lube of varying concentrations to see the natural tolerance E.coli has to lube
Text describing graph like a figure
We then wanted to see the exact concentration in which the growth is affected so repeated the experiment at smaller increments
Text describing graph like a figure. Error bars were not included as these were negligible at 0.0005 (0.4%).
Once the IrrE part arrived we were able to repeat the above experiment with the transformed E.coli. This enabled us to compare WT E. coli with that of E.coli transformed with IrrE, a gene previously submitted to the registry which is shown to improve tolerance of E.coli to salt.
Text describing the graph
First we performed a control experiment in which we grew wild-type E.coli in Lube of varying concentrations to see the natural tolerance E.coli has to lube
Text describing graph like a figure
We then wanted to see the exact concentration in which the growth is affected so repeated the experiment at smaller increments
Text describing graph like a figure. Error bars were not included as these were negligible at 0.0005 (0.4%).
Once the IrrE part arrived we were able to repeat the above experiment with the transformed E.coli. This enabled us to compare WT E. coli with that of E.coli transformed with IrrE, a gene previously submitted to the registry which is shown to improve tolerance of E.coli to salt.
Text describing the graph
