Tiffany.dang (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 492: | Line 492: | ||
<h1>Guanajuato Mexico (GTO_Mexico)</h1> | <h1>Guanajuato Mexico (GTO_Mexico)</h1> | ||
− | <p>This year we collaborated with the Guanajuato Mexico team in developing a curriculum as an introduction to synthetic biology for first year university students. This curriculum covered the basics of biology, synthetic biology and applications. Specifically, we designed a lesson plan on the ethics of synthetic biology followed by a debate on the justification of using synthetic biology in a real case study. This helped to expose the students to different viewpoints on the applications of synthetic biology and what we should be aware of as scientists in designing these biological systems. We were able to present this curriculum including our lesson plan to a group of first year students in Guanajuato. </p> </br> | + | <p>This year, we collaborated with the Guanajuato Mexico team in developing a curriculum as an introduction to synthetic biology for first year university students. This curriculum covered the basics of biology, synthetic biology and applications. Specifically, we designed a lesson plan on the ethics of synthetic biology followed by a debate on the justification of using synthetic biology in a real case study. This helped to expose the students to different viewpoints on the applications of synthetic biology and what we should be aware of as scientists in designing these biological systems. We were able to present this curriculum including our lesson plan to a group of first year students in Guanajuato. </p> </br> |
<p>Not everyone in the class shared the same perspective on synthetic biology and genetically modified organisms. From this collaboration we gained a better understanding of the perception the general public held on the usage of synthetic biology. We learned that a large fear is due to safety and contamination to existing infrastructure. This helped our project by reevaluating some of the project requirements we initially established. It also helped us find a way to better communicate our research to the general public.</p></br> | <p>Not everyone in the class shared the same perspective on synthetic biology and genetically modified organisms. From this collaboration we gained a better understanding of the perception the general public held on the usage of synthetic biology. We learned that a large fear is due to safety and contamination to existing infrastructure. This helped our project by reevaluating some of the project requirements we initially established. It also helped us find a way to better communicate our research to the general public.</p></br> | ||
<p><strong>Link:</strong> <a href=”https://2016.igem.org/Team:Guanajuato_Mx”>Guanajuato Mexico’s Wiki on our collaboration</p> | <p><strong>Link:</strong> <a href=”https://2016.igem.org/Team:Guanajuato_Mx”>Guanajuato Mexico’s Wiki on our collaboration</p> |
Revision as of 06:42, 15 October 2016
Collaboration
Guanajuato Mexico (GTO_Mexico)
This year, we collaborated with the Guanajuato Mexico team in developing a curriculum as an introduction to synthetic biology for first year university students. This curriculum covered the basics of biology, synthetic biology and applications. Specifically, we designed a lesson plan on the ethics of synthetic biology followed by a debate on the justification of using synthetic biology in a real case study. This helped to expose the students to different viewpoints on the applications of synthetic biology and what we should be aware of as scientists in designing these biological systems. We were able to present this curriculum including our lesson plan to a group of first year students in Guanajuato.
Not everyone in the class shared the same perspective on synthetic biology and genetically modified organisms. From this collaboration we gained a better understanding of the perception the general public held on the usage of synthetic biology. We learned that a large fear is due to safety and contamination to existing infrastructure. This helped our project by reevaluating some of the project requirements we initially established. It also helped us find a way to better communicate our research to the general public.