Difference between revisions of "Team:UGent Belgium/Demonstrate"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<div class="container"> | <div class="container"> | ||
| − | < | + | <h2 id="measurements">Functional assay</h2> |
<p>The goal of or project is to provide a working product that can collect a substantial amount of water. To this end, we performed some experiments to measure the exact quantity of water collected by our shape, coated with polylactic acid (PLA) with biotin and treated with the Ice Nucleating Protein (INP)-streptavidin complex.</p> | <p>The goal of or project is to provide a working product that can collect a substantial amount of water. To this end, we performed some experiments to measure the exact quantity of water collected by our shape, coated with polylactic acid (PLA) with biotin and treated with the Ice Nucleating Protein (INP)-streptavidin complex.</p> | ||
<p>We used a mixture of PLA and biotin dissolved in dichloremethane. These were used to either coat water collectors or to dip microscope slides. The coated objects are left to dry overnight in a laminar flow cabinet, allowing the solvent to evaporate.</p> | <p>We used a mixture of PLA and biotin dissolved in dichloremethane. These were used to either coat water collectors or to dip microscope slides. The coated objects are left to dry overnight in a laminar flow cabinet, allowing the solvent to evaporate.</p> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
<p>In each experiment, the measurements were performed in a <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:UGent_Belgium/Hardware">controlled humidified chamber</a>. Both the temperature and the humidity were constantly monitored and the latter was actively controlled using on-off control.</p> | <p>In each experiment, the measurements were performed in a <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:UGent_Belgium/Hardware">controlled humidified chamber</a>. Both the temperature and the humidity were constantly monitored and the latter was actively controlled using on-off control.</p> | ||
| − | < | + | <h3 id="experiment-1-effect-biological-treatments-on-the-water-collectors">Experiment 1: effect biological treatments on the water collectors</h3> |
| − | < | + | <h4 id="setup">Setup</h4> |
<p>In a first experiment we probed to the effect of the four biological treatments described above.</p> | <p>In a first experiment we probed to the effect of the four biological treatments described above.</p> | ||
<p>The dome of four water collector were coated using the PLA-biotin solution. Subsequently each collector was sawn in half in order to have a treatment and associated control for each experimental unit.</p> | <p>The dome of four water collector were coated using the PLA-biotin solution. Subsequently each collector was sawn in half in order to have a treatment and associated control for each experimental unit.</p> | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
<p class="caption" align="center">The collectors in the humidified chamber.</p> | <p class="caption" align="center">The collectors in the humidified chamber.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | < | + | <h4 id="results">Results</h4> |
<p>The following bar chart shows the difference of in water accumulation in gram of each treatment compared to the half that was used as a control.</p> | <p>The following bar chart shows the difference of in water accumulation in gram of each treatment compared to the half that was used as a control.</p> | ||
<div class="figure" align="middle"> | <div class="figure" align="middle"> | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<p>The average amount of water collected by all the experimental units is <span class="math inline">3.07 ± 0.38</span> gram. The difference of the effect of the different treatments (between -0.92 and 0.6 gram difference in water collection of treatment versus control). Unfortunately, it appears that the INP treatments result in a decrease in water collection. As the effect is quite small and we could not perform any replications, it is perhaps safest to conclude that these results do not support any conclusions either way.</p> | <p>The average amount of water collected by all the experimental units is <span class="math inline">3.07 ± 0.38</span> gram. The difference of the effect of the different treatments (between -0.92 and 0.6 gram difference in water collection of treatment versus control). Unfortunately, it appears that the INP treatments result in a decrease in water collection. As the effect is quite small and we could not perform any replications, it is perhaps safest to conclude that these results do not support any conclusions either way.</p> | ||
| − | < | + | <h3 id="experiment-2-comparison-biological-treatments-on-microscope-slides">Experiment 2: comparison biological treatments on microscope slides</h3> |
| − | < | + | <h4 id="setup-1">Setup</h4> |
<p>For this smaller experiment, we dipped four microscope slides in the PLA-biotin solution and subsequently applied all biological treatments to each of the slides. Afterwards, all slides were rinsed thoroughly with physiological solution.</p> | <p>For this smaller experiment, we dipped four microscope slides in the PLA-biotin solution and subsequently applied all biological treatments to each of the slides. Afterwards, all slides were rinsed thoroughly with physiological solution.</p> | ||
<p>The slides were placed straight up in a falcon tube, allowing moist air to reach the treated surface. All four slides in a falcon were weighted on the analytical scale.</p> | <p>The slides were placed straight up in a falcon tube, allowing moist air to reach the treated surface. All four slides in a falcon were weighted on the analytical scale.</p> | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<p>The falcons were placed randomly in the humidified chamber for six hours. Their places were changed periodically to decrease the chance of confounding errors. Afterwards, the accumulation of water was determined for each experimental unit.</p> | <p>The falcons were placed randomly in the humidified chamber for six hours. Their places were changed periodically to decrease the chance of confounding errors. Afterwards, the accumulation of water was determined for each experimental unit.</p> | ||
| − | < | + | <h3 id="results-1">Results</h3> |
<p>The amount of water collected of the four slides, by treatment, is shown in the bar chart below.</p> | <p>The amount of water collected of the four slides, by treatment, is shown in the bar chart below.</p> | ||
<div class="figure" align="middle"> | <div class="figure" align="middle"> | ||
Revision as of 21:10, 16 October 2016
Functional assay
The goal of or project is to provide a working product that can collect a substantial amount of water. To this end, we performed some experiments to measure the exact quantity of water collected by our shape, coated with polylactic acid (PLA) with biotin and treated with the Ice Nucleating Protein (INP)-streptavidin complex.
We used a mixture of PLA and biotin dissolved in dichloremethane. These were used to either coat water collectors or to dip microscope slides. The coated objects are left to dry overnight in a laminar flow cabinet, allowing the solvent to evaporate.
We considered four biological treatments:
- mGFPuv-mSA2
- RFP + INP-NC-mSA2
- inaZ + INP-NC-mSA2
- INP-mSA
In each experiment, the measurements were performed in a controlled humidified chamber. Both the temperature and the humidity were constantly monitored and the latter was actively controlled using on-off control.
Experiment 1: effect biological treatments on the water collectors
Setup
In a first experiment we probed to the effect of the four biological treatments described above.
The dome of four water collector were coated using the PLA-biotin solution. Subsequently each collector was sawn in half in order to have a treatment and associated control for each experimental unit.
Water collector half.
One half of each collector was treated with a different biological function (i.e. mGFPuv-mSA2, RFP + INP-NC-mSA2, inaZ + INP-NC-mSA2 and INP-mSA). After waiting five minutes, to allow biotin-streptavidin bonds to form, all half-collectors were rinsed thoroughly with a physiological solution. Each halve was placed on a petri dish.
All halves were dried and weighted on an analytical scale. Finally, all petri dishes with collector halfs were randomly placed in the humidistat. They were left under a flow of humid air for one night. Afterwards, all halves were weighted again, as such that the accumulation of water could be determined.
The collectors in the humidified chamber.
Results
The following bar chart shows the difference of in water accumulation in gram of each treatment compared to the half that was used as a control.
Results first experiment. Difference in water collection between
The average amount of water collected by all the experimental units is 3.07 ± 0.38 gram. The difference of the effect of the different treatments (between -0.92 and 0.6 gram difference in water collection of treatment versus control). Unfortunately, it appears that the INP treatments result in a decrease in water collection. As the effect is quite small and we could not perform any replications, it is perhaps safest to conclude that these results do not support any conclusions either way.
Experiment 2: comparison biological treatments on microscope slides
Setup
For this smaller experiment, we dipped four microscope slides in the PLA-biotin solution and subsequently applied all biological treatments to each of the slides. Afterwards, all slides were rinsed thoroughly with physiological solution.
The slides were placed straight up in a falcon tube, allowing moist air to reach the treated surface. All four slides in a falcon were weighted on the analytical scale.
The falcons were placed randomly in the humidified chamber for six hours. Their places were changed periodically to decrease the chance of confounding errors. Afterwards, the accumulation of water was determined for each experimental unit.
Results
The amount of water collected of the four slides, by treatment, is shown in the bar chart below.
Again, the difference between the treatments is relatively small and the treatments with INP do not seem to collect more water. As for the previous experiment, this experiment could not prove that PLA bonded with INP could efficiently extract moisture from the air.
