(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
<!-- content goes here --> | <!-- content goes here --> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
− | <div class="main ui citing justified container"><h1 class = "ui | + | <div class="main ui citing justified container"><h1 class = "ui left dividing header"><span class="section"> </span>Touch painting</h1> |
<div class = "ui segment" style = "background-color: #ebc7c7; "> | <div class = "ui segment" style = "background-color: #ebc7c7; "> | ||
− | <p><b><ul><li> | + | <p><b><ul> |
+ | <li>Human cells with increased ultrasound sensitivity were shown to respond to other types of mechanical stimulation, such as shear stress and touch. | ||
+ | <li>Touch responsive cells were used as a canvas in our sci-art touch painting implementation. | ||
</ul></b></p> | </ul></b></p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 108: | Line 110: | ||
<img class="ui medium image" src=" " > | <img class="ui medium image" src=" " > | ||
<figcaption><b>Mechanical stimulation of cells by manual agitation</b><br/> | <figcaption><b>Mechanical stimulation of cells by manual agitation</b><br/> | ||
− | + | <p style="text-align:justify"> Firefly luciferase activity before (A) and immediately after (B) manual agitation is show. 24 hours after the transfection, luciferin and calcium were added to the cell medium. The cells were shaken a few times and the response was measured via bioluminescence imaging.</figcaption> | |
+ | </p> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <p>Results show that the light was emitted only in cells with the constitutive luciferase if the plate has not been moved(<ref>1 | + | <p>Results show that the light was emitted only in cells with the constitutive luciferase if the plate has not been moved (<ref>1</ref>). On the other hand shaking |
triggered activation of the luciferase, with significantly higher level in cells that harboured gas vesicles in addition to the reporter, demonstrating that activation | triggered activation of the luciferase, with significantly higher level in cells that harboured gas vesicles in addition to the reporter, demonstrating that activation | ||
does not require high pressure on cells. | does not require high pressure on cells. | ||
Line 122: | Line 125: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<p>The immediate results were visible from drawing of symbols of our project on cells that were immediately (within 5 min) visualized by imager.</p> | <p>The immediate results were visible from drawing of symbols of our project on cells that were immediately (within 5 min) visualized by imager.</p> | ||
− | <div | + | <div style="float:left; width:100%"> |
<figure data-ref="2" > | <figure data-ref="2" > | ||
− | <img | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/37/T--Slovenia--3.7.1.png"> |
<figcaption><b>Synthetic mechano-responsive calcium sensing system enables visualization of calcium influx after mechanical stimulation.</b><br/> | <figcaption><b>Synthetic mechano-responsive calcium sensing system enables visualization of calcium influx after mechanical stimulation.</b><br/> | ||
− | (A) Schematic of a cell with increased sensitivity to mechanical stimulation due to expression of mechanosensitive ion channels MscS and gas vesicle-forming proteins. Split calcium sensing system based on split firefly luciferase linked to M13 and calmodulin is shown.(B) Images of petri dishes seeded with HEK293 cells transfected with mechanosensing enhancers and luciferase reporters after stimulation of cells with glass rod. HEK293 cells were transfected with split calcium sensors. 24h after transfection cells were stimulated by touching with a glass rod. Afterwards, camera images were taken in darkness with exposure time 30 s.</figcaption> | + | <p style="text-align:justify"> (A) Schematic of a cell with increased sensitivity to mechanical stimulation due to expression of mechanosensitive ion channels MscS and gas vesicle-forming proteins. Split calcium sensing system based on split firefly luciferase linked to M13 and calmodulin is shown.(B) Images of petri dishes seeded with HEK293 cells transfected with mechanosensing enhancers and luciferase reporters after stimulation of cells with glass rod. HEK293 cells were transfected with split calcium sensors. 24h after transfection cells were stimulated by touching with a glass rod. Afterwards, camera images were taken in darkness with exposure time 30 s.</figcaption> |
+ | </p> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <p>Light emitted from cells was recorded by an imager by capturing light for with 30 sec. We observed that the lines that were drawn first were more fain that the those | ||
+ | drawn later, which suggested that the response is quite fast. This was tested by sequentially drawing separate letters and recording the image after draing each | ||
+ | letter. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <!--ŽIGA insert video in gif (Folder Pictures, Laura paints on cells.mp4) | ||
+ | <div align = "left"> | ||
+ | <figure data-ref="3" > | ||
+ | <img class="ui medium image" src="INSERT VIDEO" > | ||
+ | <figcaption><b>Video of the procedure of Laura drawing on cells and imaging of each letter on the imager.</b></figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div align = "left"> | ||
+ | <figure data-ref="4" > | ||
+ | <img class="ui medium image" src="INSERT GIF FROM HOME PAGE" > | ||
+ | <figcaption><b>Sequential drawing on cells by touch and recoding of the emitted light.</b><br/> The iGEM symbol was drawn with a glass rod letter by | ||
+ | letter on engineered human cells and imaged by a camera. Cells were transfected with constructs coding for the bacterial ion channel MscS, gas vesicles | ||
+ | (GvpA and GvpC) and a Ca-dependent cyclic split luciferase reporter. </figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | HAVE A NICE DAY | ||
+ | |||
+ | TAKE A COOKIE | ||
+ | |||
+ | GIVE A SMILE TO SOMEONE NEXT TO YOU :D | ||
+ | --> | ||
− | + | <p>Laura prepared several stamps and we experimented with different methods of cell immobilization on the plate, however due to the time constraints of the | |
− | + | iGEM project we have yet to explore the intricacies of Touchpaint techniques. Response of the system is quite fast as the sequential drawing of letters of the | |
− | + | iGEM acronym already started to fade by drawing the text letter few minutes after the first one, therefore real time monitoring of cell drawing is a very realistic | |
+ | proposition. While Touchpaint is just one artistic implementation of the technology, there are many other scientific and applied uses of this technology, | ||
+ | which are discussed in the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Implementation/Impact">Impact section</a>. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:07, 17 October 2016
Touch painting
While ultrasound was used to stimulate mechanosensors in our project, since it is most appropriate for the stimulation of deep tissue, other mechanical stimuli
could also trigger activation of mechanosensors. Mechanical stimulation appears to be a critical modulator for many aspects of biology, both of living tissue and
cells
Results
Therefore our system might be also activated by other mechanical stimuli. One of them was stimulation by direct contact that underlies the sense of touch. Our designed mechano-responsive system is composed of two modules. First we included modules to provide and increase the sensitivity to mechanical stress by mechanoresponsive ion channels and gas vesicles and secondly, the influx of calcium is visualized by the dimerization of calmodulin (attached to the C terminus of split luciferase) and M13 (attached to the N terminus of split luciferase) which results in bioluminescence after the reconstitution of split luciferase. This means that this system is able to convert the mechanical stimulus into light signal, or to put it differently, with our system we are able to see when cells are touched.
Shear flow also exerts mechanical force on cells, which also has relevance for the endothelial cells within blood vessels, therefore also the flow of the liquid medium around cells might be sensed by cells. The experiment to test this ability was performed by agitating the petri dish with attached cells. In order to identify if the engineered cells are able to respond to the sheaf flow we included control cells that either constitutively express the luciferase and cells that harbour only the calcium-dependent reporter without constructs to increase the mechanosensing along with cells expressing the gas vesicles and reporters.
Results show that the light was emitted only in cells with the constitutive luciferase if the plate has not been moved (1). On the other hand shaking triggered activation of the luciferase, with significantly higher level in cells that harboured gas vesicles in addition to the reporter, demonstrating that activation does not require high pressure on cells.
Next we wondered if cells could respond to a gentle touch. We were excited to see that already in the first experiment we could clearly see where cells have been touched by a glass rod. The best paintbush to stimulate cells without removing them from the plate has yet to be identified but we found that glass rod functions quite well. We realized that we could use touch to illuminate cells, effectively painting or drawing on cells by recording the trace with emitted light, which we called Touchpaint. At that time an Argentinian visual artist Laura Olalde, PhD, interested in arts and science symbiosis, and interested in connections between art and science visited our lab. She was immediately eager to test the new artistic medium.
The immediate results were visible from drawing of symbols of our project on cells that were immediately (within 5 min) visualized by imager.
Light emitted from cells was recorded by an imager by capturing light for with 30 sec. We observed that the lines that were drawn first were more fain that the those drawn later, which suggested that the response is quite fast. This was tested by sequentially drawing separate letters and recording the image after draing each letter.
Laura prepared several stamps and we experimented with different methods of cell immobilization on the plate, however due to the time constraints of the iGEM project we have yet to explore the intricacies of Touchpaint techniques. Response of the system is quite fast as the sequential drawing of letters of the iGEM acronym already started to fade by drawing the text letter few minutes after the first one, therefore real time monitoring of cell drawing is a very realistic proposition. While Touchpaint is just one artistic implementation of the technology, there are many other scientific and applied uses of this technology, which are discussed in the Impact section.