Difference between revisions of "Team:ASIJ Tokyo/Safety"

Line 33: Line 33:
 
         <li><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:ASIJ_Tokyo/Safety">Safety</a></li>
 
         <li><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:ASIJ_Tokyo/Safety">Safety</a></li>
 
         <li><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:ASIJ_Tokyo/Attributions">Attributions</a></li>
 
         <li><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:ASIJ_Tokyo/Attributions">Attributions</a></li>
−
          <li class="dropdown">
+
        <li><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:ASIJ_Tokyo/Parts">Parts</a></li>    
−
          <a class="dropdown-toggle" data-toggle="dropdown" href="">Parts<span class="caret"></span></a>
+
 
−
          <ul class="dropdown-menu">
+
−
            <li><a href="https://2016.igem.org/ASIJProjectDescription">Anderson Promoters</a></li>
+
−
            <li><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:ASIJ_Tokyo/Experiments">Tags</a></li>
+
−
            <li><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:ASIJ_Tokyo/Results">Others</a></li>
+
−
          </ul>       
+
  
 
       </ul>
 
       </ul>

Revision as of 01:22, 18 October 2016

The BIG TEMPLATE : RESPONSIVE and FREE

Anderson Promoters

Types

Anderson Promoters
Strength: Weak (0.33) BBa_J23110
  • Wanted a weak promoter to measure its PET plastic degradation up against the other promoters
    • Strength: moderate (0.58) BBa_J23111
  • Wanted a moderate promoter to measure its PET plastic degradation up against the other promoters
    • Strength: strong (1) BBa_J23100
  • Wanted a strong promoter to measure its PET plastic degradation up against the other promoters