Difference between revisions of "Team:UGent Belgium/Proof"
(Added microscopic slide part) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
| + | <div class="container"> | ||
| + | <h2 id="experiment-2-comparison-biological-treatments-on-microscope-slides">Experiment 2: comparison biological treatments on microscope slides</h2> | ||
| + | <h3 id="setup-1">Setup</h3> | ||
| + | <p>For this smaller experiment, we dipped four microscope slides in the PLA-biotin solution and subsequently applied all biological treatments to each of the slides. Afterwards, all slides were rinsed thoroughly with physiological solution.</p> | ||
| + | <p>The slides were placed straight up in a falcon tube, allowing moist air to reach the treated surface. All four slides in a falcon were weighted on the analytical scale.</p> | ||
| + | <div class="figure" align="middle"> | ||
| + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/6c/T--UGent_Belgium--slideshum.jpeg" width="500"> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | + | <p>The falcons were placed randomly in the humidified chamber for six hours. Their places were changed periodically to decrease the chance of confounding errors. Afterwards, the accumulation of water was determined for each experimental unit.</p> | |
| − | + | <h2 id="results-1">Results</h2> | |
| − | + | <p>The amount of water collected of the four slides, by treatment, is shown in the bar chart below.</p> | |
| + | <div class="figure" align="middle"> | ||
| + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/de/T--UGent_Belgium--micro.jpeg" width="500"> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | <p>Again, the difference between the treatments is relatively small and the treatments with INP do not seem to collect more water. As for the previous experiment, this experiment could not prove that PLA bonded with INP could efficiently extract moisture from the air.</p> | ||
| + | <p> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
{{Team:UGent_Belgium/footer}} | {{Team:UGent_Belgium/footer}} | ||
Revision as of 09:55, 18 October 2016
Experiment 2: comparison biological treatments on microscope slides
Setup
For this smaller experiment, we dipped four microscope slides in the PLA-biotin solution and subsequently applied all biological treatments to each of the slides. Afterwards, all slides were rinsed thoroughly with physiological solution.
The slides were placed straight up in a falcon tube, allowing moist air to reach the treated surface. All four slides in a falcon were weighted on the analytical scale.
The falcons were placed randomly in the humidified chamber for six hours. Their places were changed periodically to decrease the chance of confounding errors. Afterwards, the accumulation of water was determined for each experimental unit.
Results
The amount of water collected of the four slides, by treatment, is shown in the bar chart below.
Again, the difference between the treatments is relatively small and the treatments with INP do not seem to collect more water. As for the previous experiment, this experiment could not prove that PLA bonded with INP could efficiently extract moisture from the air.
