Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
<div class = "ui segment" style = "background-color: #ebc7c7; "> | <div class = "ui segment" style = "background-color: #ebc7c7; "> | ||
<p><b><ul> | <p><b><ul> | ||
− | <li>Two TEVp variants (TEVpE and TEVpH) were tested and proved to be orthogonal | + | <li>Two TEVp variants (TEVpE and TEVpH) were tested and proved to be mutually orthogonal. |
<li>Upon overexpression none of the tested proteases were toxic to mammalian cells, demonstrating that they do not interfere with essential cellular processes. | <li>Upon overexpression none of the tested proteases were toxic to mammalian cells, demonstrating that they do not interfere with essential cellular processes. | ||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="content"> | <div class="content"> | ||
− | <p>TEV protease is a highly specific 242 amino acids long, 27 kDa cysteine protease, that originates from the tobacco etch virus (TEV) of the Potyvirus genus. | + | <p>TEV protease is a highly specific, 242 amino acids long, 27 kDa cysteine protease, that originates from the tobacco etch virus (TEV) of the Potyvirus genus. |
− | It has a target recognition sequence of seven amino acids, ENLYFQ-S/G, where cleavage occurs after the glutamine residue | + | It has a target recognition sequence of seven amino acids, ENLYFQ-S/G, where cleavage occurs after the glutamine residue (denoted by the – symbol), |
− | and the final residue of the recognition sequence can be either S or G | + | and the final residue of the recognition sequence can be either S or G (denoted by the / symbol). This substrate sequence is scarcely represented in the |
proteome. TEV protease is therefore relatively non-toxic<x-ref>Parks1994</x-ref> and can be safely expressed in host cells. Due to this non-toxicity and | proteome. TEV protease is therefore relatively non-toxic<x-ref>Parks1994</x-ref> and can be safely expressed in host cells. Due to this non-toxicity and | ||
its high cleavage specificity, TEVp is an attractive protease for use in several biotechnological applications, such as the removal of the affinity tags | its high cleavage specificity, TEVp is an attractive protease for use in several biotechnological applications, such as the removal of the affinity tags | ||
from recombinant proteins. | from recombinant proteins. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | <p>Despite its widespread use in | + | <p>Despite its widespread use in biotechnology, TEVp also displays some shortcomings, the most prominent of them being self-cleavage. Substitution |
of Ser-219 with Val or Pro <x-ref>Cesaratto2015</x-ref> or a replacement of the C-terminal sequence MSELVYSQ with the sequence MNEGGGLE | of Ser-219 with Val or Pro <x-ref>Cesaratto2015</x-ref> or a replacement of the C-terminal sequence MSELVYSQ with the sequence MNEGGGLE | ||
<x-ref>Cesaratto2015</x-ref> decreased the self-cleavage of TEVp and thereby increased its activity. | <x-ref>Cesaratto2015</x-ref> decreased the self-cleavage of TEVp and thereby increased its activity. | ||
Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div><br/> | </div><br/> | ||
− | <p>To overcome | + | <p>To overcome the lack of inducible orthogonal proteases, we looked for the characterized TEVp mutants and naturally occurring proteases, closely related to |
TEVp that might also be used to function as split proteases.</p> | TEVp that might also be used to function as split proteases.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
<h3><span id = "var" class="section"> </span>TEVp variants</h3> | <h3><span id = "var" class="section"> </span>TEVp variants</h3> | ||
− | <p>Based on the sequence alterations described by Yi et al. <x-ref>Yi2013</x-ref> our team decided to test | + | <p>Based on the sequence alterations described by Yi et al. <x-ref>Yi2013</x-ref>, our team decided to test two mutated variants of TEVp - TEVpE and TEVpH.</p> |
<div class="ui styled fluid accordion"> | <div class="ui styled fluid accordion"> | ||
Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
<div class="content"> | <div class="content"> | ||
<p>Yi et al. <x-ref>Yi2013</x-ref> tackled the problem of acquiring novel orthogonal proteases by screening a library of TEVp mutants for orthogonal | <p>Yi et al. <x-ref>Yi2013</x-ref> tackled the problem of acquiring novel orthogonal proteases by screening a library of TEVp mutants for orthogonal | ||
− | specificity. They designed a novel yeast ER sequestration screening assay that allowed them to identify | + | specificity. They designed a novel yeast ER sequestration screening assay that allowed them to identify variants of TEVp that recognize |
− | alternative substrates | + | alternative substrates. The two most prominent mutants were TEVpE, which cleaves the substrate ENLYFE-S (TEV(E)s) and TEVpH, cleaving the substrate ENLYFH-S (TEV(H)s). Although the two variants were also able to cleave the wild type TEVp substrate |
− | ENLYFQ-S, they displayed a high preference for their own variation of the substrate and were mutually orthogonal. | + | ENLYFQ-S (TEVs), they displayed a high preference for their own variation of the substrate and were mutually orthogonal. |
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
<p>To test these two proteases we used a <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Protease_signaling/Reporters">cleavable firefly luciferase | <p>To test these two proteases we used a <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Protease_signaling/Reporters">cleavable firefly luciferase | ||
− | (fLuc) reporter</a> with an appropriate cleavage sequence inserted in a permissible site. We observed a significant decrease in | + | (fLuc) reporter</a> with an appropriate cleavage sequence inserted in a permissible site. We observed a significant decrease in luciferase activity upon |
− | + | co-expression of the reporters and their corresponding proteases, whereas co-expression of an orthogonal protease did not decrease the luciferase activity (<ref>1</ref>). These results were additionally confirmed by results from western blotting, where cleavage of the luciferase reporter was | |
− | + | detected only in the presence of the corresponding protease, but not in the presence of orthogonal proteases (<ref>2</ref>). | |
− | detected only in | + | |
</p> | </p> | ||
<div style = "float:left; width:100%"> | <div style = "float:left; width:100%"> | ||
Line 163: | Line 162: | ||
<figcaption><b>Activity and orthogonality of TEVp variants.</b><br/> | <figcaption><b>Activity and orthogonality of TEVp variants.</b><br/> | ||
<p style="text-align:justify">HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated fLuc:TEVs and TEVp variant constructs. Luciferase activity was | <p style="text-align:justify">HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated fLuc:TEVs and TEVp variant constructs. Luciferase activity was | ||
− | + | determined 24h after transfection. | |
</p> | </p> | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> |
Revision as of 14:00, 18 October 2016
Protease orthogonality - in progress TL
The first challenge in construction of a new protease-based signaling cascade was the selection of appropriate proteases. The candidate proteases should: i) recognize defined target cleavage sequences, preferably as long as possible; ii) be active in mammalian cells, but not toxic to them and iii) be inducible, ideally through the reconstitution of split protein fragments. Most importantly, a large number of proteases with similar properties but different substrates should be available to allow for modular construction of signaling pathways and logic functions. These proteases should be orthogonal to each other, meaning that their specific cleavage sites should not be recognized by other proteases in the system.
We found that the tobacco etch virus protease (TEVp) was the only protease described in the literature to match our criteria.
TEV protease is a highly specific, 242 amino acids long, 27 kDa cysteine protease, that originates from the tobacco etch virus (TEV) of the Potyvirus genus.
It has a target recognition sequence of seven amino acids, ENLYFQ-S/G, where cleavage occurs after the glutamine residue (denoted by the – symbol),
and the final residue of the recognition sequence can be either S or G (denoted by the / symbol). This substrate sequence is scarcely represented in the
proteome. TEV protease is therefore relatively non-toxic
Despite its widespread use in biotechnology, TEVp also displays some shortcomings, the most prominent of them being self-cleavage. Substitution
of Ser-219 with Val or Pro
To overcome the lack of inducible orthogonal proteases, we looked for the characterized TEVp mutants and naturally occurring proteases, closely related to TEVp that might also be used to function as split proteases.
Results
TEVp variants
Based on the sequence alterations described by Yi et al.
Yi et al.
To test these two proteases we used a cleavable firefly luciferase (fLuc) reporter with an appropriate cleavage sequence inserted in a permissible site. We observed a significant decrease in luciferase activity upon co-expression of the reporters and their corresponding proteases, whereas co-expression of an orthogonal protease did not decrease the luciferase activity (1). These results were additionally confirmed by results from western blotting, where cleavage of the luciferase reporter was detected only in the presence of the corresponding protease, but not in the presence of orthogonal proteases (2).
No data has previously been reported on TEVpE and TEVpH toxicity. Therefore we performed a viability test for expression of all three TEVp variants in HEK293T cells. Even after transfection with a high amount of the plasmid for each respective protease, the cells showed high viability, with practically no difference when compared to control transfections (3).
TEVp homologs
Introduction of two new TEVp variants expanded our repertoire of tools, demonstrating that we can use the results of the mutational screening of protease variants, but a larger number of strictly orthogonal proteases would be required for modular design of logic gates. We therefore decided to investigate activity of de novo created split proteases from the potyviridae family.
The NIa proteases from the potyviridae group of plant viruses in general recognize a seven amino acid sequence motif as their substrate and
are classified as cysteine proteases with an active site closely related to eukaryotic serine proteases. The NIa proteases adopt a characteristic
two-domain antiparallel β-barrel fold. The active site of the protease comprises a catalytic triad: His-46, Asp-81, Cys-151 (amino acids numbered
according to the TEVp sequence) with a Gly-x-Cys-Gly motif around the active cysteine residue
We searched for sequences of different potyviruses available on UniProt, paying particular attention to any evidence of orthogonality among their target substrates. We decided to test the plum pox virus protease (PPVp), the soybean mosaic virus protease (SbMVp), and the sunflower mild mosaic virus protease (SuMMVp).
PPVp is one of the most studied potyviral proteases after the TEVp. Its substrate (PPVs) has an amino acid sequence NVVVHQ-A.
In contrast to TEVp, it has been reported that PPVp is resistant to self-cleavage at the C-terminus
SbMVp has been
recently studied by Seo et al. as a tool for protein-protein interaction studies in the soybean. The substrate (SBMVs) has been determined to be the
sequence ESVSLQ-S
Similarly, SuMMVp has been used by Fernandez-Rodriguez et al.
All selected potyviral proteases were designed as synthetic genes and tested in mammalian cells for the activity using the cyclic luciferase reporters, which results in the luciferase activity only upon cleavage. We detected an increase of luciferase activity only in the corresponding protease-reporter pairs, confirming exquisite orthogonality of the selected proteases and their activity in the human cell chassis (5).