Difference between revisions of "Team:Slovenia/Integrated Practices"
Zigapusnik (Talk | contribs) |
Zigapusnik (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
} | } | ||
else { | else { | ||
| − | myId.innerHTML = '<p>Mostly communicating with MDs, researchers in natural science, and among ourselves, we realized we could quickly fall in the trap of having a limited view of synthetic biology and our project, living in a sort of confirmation microbubble composed of approving scientist, but excluding the general public and their opinion. In order to tackle this, we wanted to talk to people who can understand the greater impact of science on society and how that is perceived by the general public. Taking into account the societal impacts of synthetic biology allows for more dynamic, varied solutions in the project. \ | + | /*myId.innerHTML = '<p>Mostly communicating with MDs, researchers in natural science, and among ourselves, we realized we could quickly fall in the trap of having a limited view of synthetic biology and our project, living in a sort of confirmation microbubble composed of approving scientist, but excluding the general public and their opinion. In order to tackle this, we wanted to talk to people who can understand the greater impact of science on society and how that is perceived by the general public. Taking into account the societal impacts of synthetic biology allows for more dynamic, varied solutions in the project. \ |
We consulted prof. dr. Franc Mali and doc. dr. Toni Pustovrh, two culturologists from the University of Ljubljana, whose field of expertise is the sociology of science. We presented our project to them and they shared with us some excellent insights. Consultations with them indeed opened our horizons –having only best intentions we did not think of the potential misuse of our system, such as bypassing the doping regulations in professional sport by enhancing one’s own cells. The conversation later shifted to the wider filed of synthetic biology and its role in ensuring social justice, which impassioned us and educated our Social Engagement and Education segment <ref>6</ref>. </p>\ | We consulted prof. dr. Franc Mali and doc. dr. Toni Pustovrh, two culturologists from the University of Ljubljana, whose field of expertise is the sociology of science. We presented our project to them and they shared with us some excellent insights. Consultations with them indeed opened our horizons –having only best intentions we did not think of the potential misuse of our system, such as bypassing the doping regulations in professional sport by enhancing one’s own cells. The conversation later shifted to the wider filed of synthetic biology and its role in ensuring social justice, which impassioned us and educated our Social Engagement and Education segment <ref>6</ref>. </p>\ | ||
<div align = "left"> \ | <div align = "left"> \ | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
</figure> \ | </figure> \ | ||
</div>'; | </div>'; | ||
| − | myId.data-inner = "scientists"; | + | myId.data-inner = "scientists"; */ |
} | } | ||
} | } | ||
Revision as of 15:20, 18 October 2016
Integrated Practices
Various extraordinary synthetic biology projects can be depicted as boats and ships, seeking the safety of a harbor in the wide ocean, their main purpose finding the final destination.
No matter how different or fascinating the boat is, its main purpose is to safely arrive to the harbor. Before there were modern GPS systems, sailors had to rely on using natural events and signs. One of the main was the lodestar, the most shining star, which is always a good orientation point.
Similarly, many research projects can struggle no matter how fascinating they are. They might lose the feeling of reality and just travel for the sake of travel.
In order to give the right coordinates, which showed to be of high importance in our case, we developed a new symbol for future iGEM teams who might apply their projects to the medical field – community oriented lodestar. No matter if the team is competing in the foundational advance or medical application section, maximization of benefit to society should be the number one priority.
/interactive picture comes here/
Consequently, if ever lost, teams should just find the shining star and orient in respect to it. By thorough discussions and careful implementation of ideas
provided by all the participants involved in dialogue, iGEM team should be able to present at the Giant Jamboree the most of the project –completely analyzed project
in real life. It’s not only the idea that influences the minds and thinking of individuals involved, but the relationship is reciprocal. The people involved have a great
deal of influence over the idea itself as well. The concept will be explained on our example. While we are competing in the foundational advance track we have considered
many possible medical applications of our project, particularly diabetes, Parkinson’s disease and hemorrhagic diseases, since medicine is the field of study of several
students and other students and mentors have a soft spot for this direction. .
