Difference between revisions of "Team:ASIJ Tokyo/Results"

Line 8,025: Line 8,025:
 
<img><img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/7c/Screen_Shot_2016-10-18_at_9.32.34_AM.png"><p style-"float:center; clear:right"></img>
 
<img><img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/7c/Screen_Shot_2016-10-18_at_9.32.34_AM.png"><p style-"float:center; clear:right"></img>
  
−
 
−
<p class="sansserif" "color:#434343><font size="4">
 
−
Goal #1: To construct a PETase biobrick to add to the iGEM registry. We wanted to achieve this goal so as to make the PETase enzyme more accessible for further study in the future.
 
−
</p>
 
−
In order to test for successful synthesis of a PETase biobrick, our team decided to integrate the gene into a plasmid backbone that would only express Chloro resistance following modification of the initial backbone. Terminator sequences prevented transcription of the plasmid unless a gene was
 
−
</p>
 
−
<img><img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/9b/Screen_Shot_2016-10-18_at_11.35.49_PM.png"><p style-"float:center; clear:right">></img>
 
−
 
−
<break>
 
−
However, our experiment was ineffectual in demonstrating a substantial degradation of PET plastic. The differences in mass measurements of PET after allowing the <i>E. coli</i> bacterium to secrete PETase into the system were insignificant. We believe human errors, such as the failure to replace the LB broth suspension at appropriate time intervals to maintain the <i> E. Coli </i>  in log phase, were a significant cause of experimental inaccuracies. In addition, time constraints prevented further data collection.
 
−
 
−
We are unsure regarding whether our PETase construct was successfully secreted into the system. One way we could test this would be to tag PETase with c-myc, and perform a Western Blot test.
 
−
<br>
 
  
 
<h4>Table 1: Change in Average Mass of PET Film (g) per Promoter</h4>
 
<h4>Table 1: Change in Average Mass of PET Film (g) per Promoter</h4>

Revision as of 17:36, 18 October 2016

The BIG TEMPLATE : RESPONSIVE and FREE

Table 1: Change in Average Mass of PET Film (g) per Promoter

Day 0 Day 7 Day 13
Strong 0.05175 0.05175 0.05175
Moderately-Strong 0.071 0.071 0.07125
Weak 0.06675 0.06825 0.06725

Graph 1: Average PET Mass Sample over Time

graphs



Future Works

Although we were successful in creating a PETase biobrick, we have yet to collect enough data to find an ideal promoter for the construct. As such, the future proceedings of this project would be in gathering a greater amount of data at more frequent intervals in order to identify an ideal promoter.
In addition, we hope to insert an ampicillin resistance gene in our construct, and test for E. coli growth on an ampicillin plate. Testing for another selection factor would act as a secondary confirmation test for the successful construction of a PETase biobrick.
Determining the Andersen promoter with the highest potential to degrade PET plastic would be the first step regarding real-life applications of our lab. The later steps of the PET degradation process, such as the breakdown of Terephthalic Acid and Ethylene Glycol, may be topics of further investigation.

RESULTS