Difference between revisions of "Team:Slovenia/Idea/Challenge"
Zigapusnik (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
</a> | </a> | ||
<div class="ui vertical sticky text menu"> | <div class="ui vertical sticky text menu"> | ||
| − | <a class="item" href="# | + | <a class="item" href="//2016.igem.org/Team:Slovenia"> |
| + | <i class="chevron circle left icon"></i> | ||
| + | <b>Home</b> | ||
| + | </a> | ||
| + | <a class="item" href="//2016.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Idea/Challenge" style = "color:#DB2828;"> | ||
| + | <i class="selected radio icon"></i> | ||
| + | <b>Challenges</b> | ||
| + | </a> | ||
| + | <a class="item" href="#chone" style="margin-left: 10%;"> | ||
<i class="selected radio icon"></i> | <i class="selected radio icon"></i> | ||
| − | <b> | + | <b>Challenge 1</b> |
</a> | </a> | ||
| − | <a class="item" href="# | + | <a class="item" href="#chtwo" style="margin-left: 10%"> |
<i class="selected radio icon"></i> | <i class="selected radio icon"></i> | ||
| − | <b> | + | <b>Challenge 2</b> |
</a> | </a> | ||
| − | <a class="item" href="# | + | <a class="item" href="#chthree" style="margin-left: 10%"> |
<i class="selected radio icon"></i> | <i class="selected radio icon"></i> | ||
| − | <b> | + | <b>Challenge 3</b> |
</a> | </a> | ||
| − | <a class="item" href=" | + | <a class="item" href="//2016.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Idea/Solution"> |
<i class="chevron circle right icon"></i> | <i class="chevron circle right icon"></i> | ||
| − | <b> | + | <b>Solutions</b> |
</a> | </a> | ||
| − | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 75: | Line 82: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
<div class="main ui citing justified container"> | <div class="main ui citing justified container"> | ||
| − | <h1 class = "ui centered dividing header"><span class="section">nbsp;</span></h1> | + | <h1 class = "ui centered dividing header"><span class="section"> </span></h1> |
<div class = "ui segment"> | <div class = "ui segment"> | ||
| − | + | <h3><span id="chone" class = "section"> </span>Challenge 1: Noninvasive activation of cells in the tissue</h3> | |
| − | + | ||
<p>Among the signals that can be used to activate engineered cells, light seems to have the best properties – it can be instantly turned on and off, it can be | <p>Among the signals that can be used to activate engineered cells, light seems to have the best properties – it can be instantly turned on and off, it can be | ||
restricted to the selected location and its intensity can be adjusted, which makes it in many ways superior to stimulation by chemicals, temperature or pH and is | restricted to the selected location and its intensity can be adjusted, which makes it in many ways superior to stimulation by chemicals, temperature or pH and is | ||
responsible for the popularity of optogenetics. Its only apparent disadvantage is that most tissues are poorly transparent to light, which can therefore penetrate only | responsible for the popularity of optogenetics. Its only apparent disadvantage is that most tissues are poorly transparent to light, which can therefore penetrate only | ||
| − | short | + | short distances. Therefore, to stimulate cells in deep tissue, such as in the brain, invasive procedures have to be used. We envisioned, as an attractive |
alternative signal, induction of cells with ultrasound, which can readily penetrate deep into tissues, has been proven harmless unless used at very high power, can be | alternative signal, induction of cells with ultrasound, which can readily penetrate deep into tissues, has been proven harmless unless used at very high power, can be | ||
regulated in duration and intensity similar to light, and can also be focused. Ultrasound has been reported to activate mechanoreceptors; therefore the challenge was | regulated in duration and intensity similar to light, and can also be focused. Ultrasound has been reported to activate mechanoreceptors; therefore the challenge was | ||
| Line 88: | Line 94: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | + | <div class = "ui segment"> | |
| − | + | <h3><span id="chtwo" class = "section"> </span>Challenge 2: Engineering fast cellular response</h3> | |
<p>One of the important challenges of synthetic biology is to achieve faster response of cells to different stimuli. While most engineered genetic circuits are based | <p>One of the important challenges of synthetic biology is to achieve faster response of cells to different stimuli. While most engineered genetic circuits are based | ||
| − | on transcriptional regulation, which has a delay due to the transcription/ | + | on transcriptional regulation, which has a delay due to the transcription/translation, cells are also able to respond faster by using signaling pathways based on protein |
| − | interactions or their modifications. | + | interactions or their modifications. A fast response is particularly important, for example, for the release of hormones such as insulin or neurotransmitters, where the |
response is required within minutes. Engineering new orthogonal signaling pathways without interfering with the normal cellular processes may be quite demanding, | response is required within minutes. Engineering new orthogonal signaling pathways without interfering with the normal cellular processes may be quite demanding, | ||
particularly for a complex response combining several inputs. Simple transfer of a signaling pathway from another organism may be feasible; however, engineering the | particularly for a complex response combining several inputs. Simple transfer of a signaling pathway from another organism may be feasible; however, engineering the | ||
| Line 99: | Line 105: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | + | <div class = "ui segment"> | |
| − | + | <h3><span id="chthree" class = "section"> </span>Challenge 3: Fast secretion of target protein from cells</h3> | |
<p>Fast signal processing may not be sufficient to result in a fast benefit to the biological system. In addition to detection by reporters cells need to rapidly | <p>Fast signal processing may not be sufficient to result in a fast benefit to the biological system. In addition to detection by reporters cells need to rapidly | ||
demonstrate a new phenotype or send output signals to the environment. Therefore a fast response should not depend on the new synthesis of molecules but rather on | demonstrate a new phenotype or send output signals to the environment. Therefore a fast response should not depend on the new synthesis of molecules but rather on | ||
| Line 107: | Line 113: | ||
however we wanted the <b>complete system to be genetically encoded.</b> | however we wanted the <b>complete system to be genetically encoded.</b> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
| − | + | </div> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | |||
| Line 119: | Line 122: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | <div> | ||
| + | <a href="//igem.org/Main_Page"> | ||
| + | <img border="0" alt="iGEM" src="//2016.igem.org/wiki/images/8/84/T--Slovenia--logo_250x250.png" width="5%" style = "position: fixed; bottom:0%; right:1%;"> | ||
| + | </a> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:32, 18 October 2016
Challenge 1: Noninvasive activation of cells in the tissue
Among the signals that can be used to activate engineered cells, light seems to have the best properties – it can be instantly turned on and off, it can be restricted to the selected location and its intensity can be adjusted, which makes it in many ways superior to stimulation by chemicals, temperature or pH and is responsible for the popularity of optogenetics. Its only apparent disadvantage is that most tissues are poorly transparent to light, which can therefore penetrate only short distances. Therefore, to stimulate cells in deep tissue, such as in the brain, invasive procedures have to be used. We envisioned, as an attractive alternative signal, induction of cells with ultrasound, which can readily penetrate deep into tissues, has been proven harmless unless used at very high power, can be regulated in duration and intensity similar to light, and can also be focused. Ultrasound has been reported to activate mechanoreceptors; therefore the challenge was to increase the sensitivity of cellular mechanosensing and then detect the activation of mechanosensors and couple it to selected signaling processes. Achieving these milestones would usher in the era of mechanogenetics/sonogenetics.
Challenge 2: Engineering fast cellular response
One of the important challenges of synthetic biology is to achieve faster response of cells to different stimuli. While most engineered genetic circuits are based on transcriptional regulation, which has a delay due to the transcription/translation, cells are also able to respond faster by using signaling pathways based on protein interactions or their modifications. A fast response is particularly important, for example, for the release of hormones such as insulin or neurotransmitters, where the response is required within minutes. Engineering new orthogonal signaling pathways without interfering with the normal cellular processes may be quite demanding, particularly for a complex response combining several inputs. Simple transfer of a signaling pathway from another organism may be feasible; however, engineering the desired response by adapting an existing signaling pathway may be difficult. The challenge was therefore to build a modular protein interaction/modification-based signaling and logic processing pathway that would provide a faster response than transcriptional regulation.
Challenge 3: Fast secretion of target protein from cells
Fast signal processing may not be sufficient to result in a fast benefit to the biological system. In addition to detection by reporters cells need to rapidly demonstrate a new phenotype or send output signals to the environment. Therefore a fast response should not depend on the new synthesis of molecules but rather on release or modification of already synthesized molecules. The challenge was therefore to design a system where the already synthesized proteins would be released from the cells upon introduction of a signal. This has been reported before to function through the addition of chemicals to disassemble protein aggregates, however we wanted the complete system to be genetically encoded.
