Difference between revisions of "Team:Slovenia/Protease signaling/Overview"

 
(28 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 46: Line 46:
 
border: 2px solid #000000;
 
border: 2px solid #000000;
 
padding: 15px;
 
padding: 15px;
margin-left:15px;
+
margin-left:1px;
margin-bottom:15px;
+
margin-bottom:1px;
 
}
 
}
 
 
Line 59: Line 59:
 
</a>
 
</a>
 
<div class="ui vertical sticky text menu">
 
<div class="ui vertical sticky text menu">
<a class="item" href="#intro" style="margin-left: 10%">
+
<a class="item" href="//2016.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Mechanosensing/CaDependent_mediator">
 +
<i class="chevron circle left icon"></i>
 +
<b>Ca-dependent</b>
 +
<br />
 +
<b style = "margin-left: 12%">mediator</b>
 +
</a>
 +
<a class="item" href="//2016.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Protease_signaling/Overview" style="color:#DB2828;">
 
<i class="selected radio icon"></i>
 
<i class="selected radio icon"></i>
<b>Project</b>
+
<b>Protease signaling</b>
</a>
+
</a>
<a class="item" href="#achievements" style="margin-left: 10%">
+
<a class="item" href="#over" style="margin-left: 10%">
 
<i class="selected radio icon"></i>
 
<i class="selected radio icon"></i>
<b>Achievements</b>
+
<b>Overview</b>
 
</a>
 
</a>
<a class="item" href="#requirements" style="margin-left: 10%">
+
<a class="item" href="#mot" style="margin-left: 10%">
 
<i class="selected radio icon"></i>
 
<i class="selected radio icon"></i>
<b>Medal requirements</b>
+
<b>Motivation</b>
</a>
+
</a>
<a class="item" href="idea">
+
<a class="item" href="//2016.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Protease_signaling/Reporters">
 
<i class="chevron circle right icon"></i>
 
<i class="chevron circle right icon"></i>
<b>Idea</b>
+
<b>Reporters</b>
</a>
+
</a>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
 
Line 82: Line 87:
 
<!-- menu goes here -->
 
<!-- menu goes here -->
 
<!-- content goes here -->
 
<!-- content goes here -->
 +
<div>
 
<div class="main ui citing justified container">
 
<div class="main ui citing justified container">
<div class = "ui segment">
+
<h1 class = "ui centered dividing header"><span class="section">nbsp;</span></h1>
<div>
+
<h3> Achievements</h3>
+
<div class = "ui segment" style = "background-color: #ebc7c7; ">
<div class = "corners" >
+
<h3 class = "ui left dividing header"><span id = "over" class="section">&nbsp;</span>Summary of the main results on protease based signaling</h3>
<p >We successfully designed and tested four new active split site-specific proteases in addition to the previously published TEVp and therefore extended the set of functional split proteases from one to five, including TEVpE, PPVp, SuMMVp and SbMVp. Upon overexpression none of the tested proteases is toxic to mammalian cells, demonstrating that they do not interfere with essential cellular processes. </p>
+
<p><b><ul>
<p >We proved that PPVp, SuMMVp, SbMVp and TEVp are fully orthogonal to each other. This provides the building blocks for the design of complex logic operations based on post-translational protein modifications instead of the widely used transcriptional regulation. </p>
+
<li>Three TEVp homologues (PPVp, SbMVp and SuMMVp) were tested and proved to be fully orthogonal.
<p >We demonstrated higher cleavage activity of the novel split proteases against their respective substrates in comparison to already existing split TEVp. </p>
+
<li>Upon overexpression none of the tested proteases was toxic to mammalian cells, demonstrating that they do not interfere with essential cellular processes.
<p >We demonstrated that activity of new split proteases can be regulated by different external stimuli, such as chemical ligands and light. </p>
+
</div>
+
<li>Four new active split site-specific proteases were designed in addition to the previously published TEVp.  
<h3>Motivation</h3>
+
<li>We demonstrated higher cleavage activity of the novel split proteases against their respective substrates in comparison to the already existing split TEVp.
<p>Due to a delay inherent to the genetically encoded circuits based on transcription/translation, we decided to engineer a system where all components of the signaling cascade would already be synthetized and present in the cell in their inactive state. Having protein components ready to be activated by post-translational modifications would make the response of our system to activation by external stimuli faster. </p>
+
<li>The activity of the new split proteases was regulated by different external stimuli, such as chemical ligands and light.
<p>Fast signal processing in cells is mainly performed by the phosphorylation cascades. These depend on complex interaction between substrates and protein kinases or phosphatases, resulting in rapid and reversible phosphorylation. However, specificity for kinases may be difficult to engineer in order to maintain the orthogonality of complex signaling pathways. On the other hand the principles of protease target recognition are well understood. There are in fact several protease-initiated signaling pathways, such as the caspase-induced apoptosis, Notch signaling or the coagulation cascade that all respond fast. Protease-based signaling may therefore represent a versatile system for modular construction of complex logic functions. </p>
+
<li>This extends the set of functional split proteases from one to five, including TEVpE, PPVp, SuMMVp and SbMVp and provides the building blocks for the design
<p>To control designed signaling circuits based on proteolysis we needed to have available several specific orthogonal proteases which don’t interfere with native mammalian signaling cascades or with basic cellular processes. Furthermore, to prevent interference between different steps in the signaling pathways the designed proteases should be orthogonal to each other. To allow for external control, these proteases should be expressed in the cell in an inactive state and should switch to the proteolytically active state after the induction with a selected input signal. </p>
+
of complex logic operations based on post-translational protein modifications instead of the widely used transcriptional regulation.
<p>Therefore, in order to design protease-based signaling pathways we had to design and test a set of orthogonal split proteases, inducible by a wide range of different input signals.  </p>
+
 
+
</ul></b></p>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
 +
 +
<div class = "ui segment">
 +
<h3><span id = "mot" class="section">&nbsp;</span></h3>
 +
<p>Due to a delay inherent to the genetically encoded circuits based on transcription/translation, we decided to engineer a system where all components of the signaling cascade would already be synthetized and present in the cell in their inactive state. Having protein components ready to be activated by post-translational modifications would make the response of our system to activation by external stimuli faster. </p>
 +
<p>Fast signal processing in cells is mainly performed by the phosphorylation cascades. These depend on complex interaction between substrates and protein kinases or phosphatases, resulting in rapid and reversible phosphorylation. However, specificity for kinases may be difficult to engineer in order to maintain the orthogonality of complex signaling pathways. On the other hand, the principles of protease target recognition are well understood. There are in fact several protease-initiated signaling pathways, such as the caspase-induced apoptosis, Notch signaling or the coagulation cascade that all respond fast. Protease-based signaling may therefore represent a versatile system for modular construction of complex logic functions. </p>
 +
<p>To control designed signaling circuits based on proteolysis we needed to have available several specific orthogonal proteases which don’t interfere with native mammalian signaling cascades or with basic cellular processes. Furthermore, to prevent interference between different steps in the signaling pathways the designed proteases should be orthogonal to each other. To allow for external control, these proteases should be expressed in the cell in an inactive state and should switch to the proteolytically active state after the induction with a selected input signal. </p>
 +
<p>Therefore, in order to design protease-based signaling pathways we had to design and test a set of orthogonal split proteases, inducible by a wide range of different input signals.  </p>
 +
</div>
  
 
 
Line 106: Line 123:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
<div>
 +
<a href="//igem.org/Main_Page">
 +
<img border="0" alt="iGEM" src="//2016.igem.org/wiki/images/8/84/T--Slovenia--logo_250x250.png" width="5%" style = "position: fixed; bottom:0%; right:1%;">
 +
</a>
 +
</div>
 
</body>
 
</body>
 
</html>
 
</html>

Latest revision as of 10:34, 19 October 2016

Overview

nbsp;

 Summary of the main results on protease based signaling

  • Three TEVp homologues (PPVp, SbMVp and SuMMVp) were tested and proved to be fully orthogonal.
  • Upon overexpression none of the tested proteases was toxic to mammalian cells, demonstrating that they do not interfere with essential cellular processes.
  • Four new active split site-specific proteases were designed in addition to the previously published TEVp.
  • We demonstrated higher cleavage activity of the novel split proteases against their respective substrates in comparison to the already existing split TEVp.
  • The activity of the new split proteases was regulated by different external stimuli, such as chemical ligands and light.
  • This extends the set of functional split proteases from one to five, including TEVpE, PPVp, SuMMVp and SbMVp and provides the building blocks for the design of complex logic operations based on post-translational protein modifications instead of the widely used transcriptional regulation.

 

Due to a delay inherent to the genetically encoded circuits based on transcription/translation, we decided to engineer a system where all components of the signaling cascade would already be synthetized and present in the cell in their inactive state. Having protein components ready to be activated by post-translational modifications would make the response of our system to activation by external stimuli faster.

Fast signal processing in cells is mainly performed by the phosphorylation cascades. These depend on complex interaction between substrates and protein kinases or phosphatases, resulting in rapid and reversible phosphorylation. However, specificity for kinases may be difficult to engineer in order to maintain the orthogonality of complex signaling pathways. On the other hand, the principles of protease target recognition are well understood. There are in fact several protease-initiated signaling pathways, such as the caspase-induced apoptosis, Notch signaling or the coagulation cascade that all respond fast. Protease-based signaling may therefore represent a versatile system for modular construction of complex logic functions.

To control designed signaling circuits based on proteolysis we needed to have available several specific orthogonal proteases which don’t interfere with native mammalian signaling cascades or with basic cellular processes. Furthermore, to prevent interference between different steps in the signaling pathways the designed proteases should be orthogonal to each other. To allow for external control, these proteases should be expressed in the cell in an inactive state and should switch to the proteolytically active state after the induction with a selected input signal.

Therefore, in order to design protease-based signaling pathways we had to design and test a set of orthogonal split proteases, inducible by a wide range of different input signals.