Difference between revisions of "Team:Tuebingen/DeathStar"
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/3f/T--Tuebingen--DeathStar1.jpg" style="cursor: zoom-in;"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/3f/T--Tuebingen--DeathStar1.jpg" style="cursor: zoom-in;"> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
| − | + | Front view of Pipet Robot | |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/ce/T--Tuebingen--DeathStar2.jpg" style="cursor: zoom-in;"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/ce/T--Tuebingen--DeathStar2.jpg" style="cursor: zoom-in;"> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
| − | + | Close up on pipet head | |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/dc/T--Tuebingen--DeathStar3.jpg" style="cursor: zoom-in;"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/dc/T--Tuebingen--DeathStar3.jpg" style="cursor: zoom-in;"> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
| − | + | View from top | |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/9b/T--Tuebingen--DeathStar4.jpg" style="cursor: zoom-in;"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/9b/T--Tuebingen--DeathStar4.jpg" style="cursor: zoom-in;"> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
| − | + | Construction to move pipet head | |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
Latest revision as of 20:10, 19 October 2016
Death Star
Idea and plan
iGEM has a lot of wet lab work concerning cloning of plasmids into bacteria. Therefore, our team decided to design a cloning robot, which gives significant reduction in time and manpower.
The robot is designed to perform a cloning cycle. Design thoughts included different possibilities in the movement of the pipetting head and an easy mobility of the whole device. The modular design of our robot secures the mobility of the device. A solution for the realisation of the pipetting heads was found in the new forms of 3D-printer heads.
We could make a concept model for our pipet robot, as you can see above. Unfortunately, due to difficulties in finding an appropriate working place we were not able to go on with our project and we could not realize our pipet robot.
