Difference between revisions of "Team:Exeter/Integrated Practices"

 
(67 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 108: Line 108:
 
#soc{
 
#soc{
 
margin-top:-12px;
 
margin-top:-12px;
+
margin-left:-15px;
 
}
 
}
/****Social Media navbar icons****/
+
.soc_1{
/*youtube*/
+
#soc_1{  
+
 
margin-right:3px;
 
margin-right:3px;
height:50px;
 
width:48px;
 
 
}
 
}
/*facebook*/
+
.soc_2{
#soc_2{
+
 
margin-right:3px;
 
margin-right:3px;
height:50px;
 
width:48px;
 
 
}
 
}
/*Twitter*/
+
.soc_3{
#soc_3{
+
 
margin-right:3px;
 
margin-right:3px;
margin-right:18px;
 
height:50px;
 
width:48px;
 
 
}
 
}
  
Line 380: Line 369:
 
color:#47BCC2;
 
color:#47BCC2;
 
text-align:center;
 
text-align:center;
font-size:1.5vw;
+
font-size:2vw;
 
/*Max font size where "section" and "1" don't appear on*/
 
/*Max font size where "section" and "1" don't appear on*/
 
}
 
}
Line 417: Line 406:
 
}
 
}
 
#title{
 
#title{
font-size:150%;
+
font-size:260%;
 +
}
 +
.banner_link{
 +
font-size:22px;
 +
}
 +
.div_banner{
 +
margin-top:20px;
 
}
 
}
 
/*Makes side pictures on banner invisible on small screens*/
 
/*Makes side pictures on banner invisible on small screens*/
Line 441: Line 436:
 
@media (max-width: 767px){
 
@media (max-width: 767px){
 
.div_vl.backgroundimage{
 
.div_vl.backgroundimage{
height:37vh;
+
height:65vh;
 
background-size: auto 200%;
 
background-size: auto 200%;
 +
}
 +
.banner_link.filler{
 +
display:none;
 
}
 
}
 
.div_l{
 
.div_l{
Line 488: Line 486:
 
padding-top:5px;
 
padding-top:5px;
 
}
 
}
 +
}
 +
#links_drop:hover span{
 +
color:#339499;
 
}
 
}
 
</style>
 
</style>
Line 507: Line 508:
 
     <div>
 
     <div>
 
         <div class="collapse navbar-collapse" id="myNavbar">
 
         <div class="collapse navbar-collapse" id="myNavbar">
<ul class="nav navbar-nav">
+
<ul class="nav navbar-nav">
 
<li><div id="links_drop" class="dropdown">
 
<li><div id="links_drop" class="dropdown">
 
   <button class="dropdown-toggle" type="button" id="dropdownMenu1" data-toggle="dropdown" aria-haspopup="true" aria-expanded="true">
 
   <button class="dropdown-toggle" type="button" id="dropdownMenu1" data-toggle="dropdown" aria-haspopup="true" aria-expanded="true">
Line 516: Line 517:
 
<li><a id="links" style="margin:10px 0 30px 2px;padding:0;font-size:1.8vh;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Exeter/Project">Lab Project</a></li>
 
<li><a id="links" style="margin:10px 0 30px 2px;padding:0;font-size:1.8vh;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Exeter/Project">Lab Project</a></li>
 
     <li><a id="links" style="margin:30px 0 10px 2px;padding:0;font-size:1.8vh;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Exeter/Labbook">Lab Book</a></li>
 
     <li><a id="links" style="margin:30px 0 10px 2px;padding:0;font-size:1.8vh;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Exeter/Labbook">Lab Book</a></li>
 +
<li><a id="links" style="margin:30px 0 10px 2px;padding:0;font-size:1.8vh;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Exeter/Safety">Safety</a></li>
  
 
   </ul>
 
   </ul>
Line 544: Line 546:
 
    
 
    
 
<li><a id="links" style="margin:10px 0 30px 2px;padding:0;font-size:1.8vh;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Exeter/Awards">Awards</a></li>
 
<li><a id="links" style="margin:10px 0 30px 2px;padding:0;font-size:1.8vh;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Exeter/Awards">Awards</a></li>
<li><span style="margin:10px 0 30px 2px;padding:0;">Special pages</span></li>
+
<li><span style="margin:10px 0 30px 2px;padding:0;"><u>Special pages</u></span></li>
 
<li><a id="links" style="margin:30px 0 10px 2px;padding:0;font-size:1.8vh;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Exeter/HP/Silver">HP Silver</a></li>
 
<li><a id="links" style="margin:30px 0 10px 2px;padding:0;font-size:1.8vh;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Exeter/HP/Silver">HP Silver</a></li>
 
<li><a id="links" style="margin:30px 0 10px 2px;padding:0;font-size:1.8vh;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Exeter/HP/Gold">HP Gold</a></li>
 
<li><a id="links" style="margin:30px 0 10px 2px;padding:0;font-size:1.8vh;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Exeter/HP/Gold">HP Gold</a></li>
Line 556: Line 558:
  
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
<ul class="nav navbar-nav navbar-right" >
+
<ul class="nav navbar-nav navbar-right">
<li class="media_icon">
+
<li style="height:50px;width:48px;"class="soc_1">
<a id="soc_1" href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC31qfG4hnm8gRHDCkrBtAiQ">
+
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC31qfG4hnm8gRHDCkrBtAiQ">
<img id = "soc" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/23/You.png"/>
+
<img id = "soc" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/23/You.png"/></a>
</a>
+
</li>
</li>
+
<li style="height:50px;width:48px;"class="soc_2">
    <li class="media_icon" >
+
<a href="https://www.facebook.com/ExeteriGEM2016/?ref=aymt_homepage_panel">
<a id="soc_2"href="https://www.facebook.com/ExeteriGEM2016/?ref=aymt_homepage_panel">
+
<img id = "soc" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/51/Fb.png"/></a>
<img id = "soc" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/51/Fb.png"/>
+
</li>
</a>
+
<li style="height:50px;width:48px;"class="soc_3">
</li>
+
<a href="https://twitter.com/exeter_igem">
    <li class="media_icon" >
+
<img id = "soc" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/76/Twit.jpg"/></a>
<a id="soc_3" href="https://twitter.com/exeter_igem">
+
</li>
<img id = "soc" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/76/Twit.jpg"/>
+
</ul>
</a>
+
</li>
+
</ul>
+
 
    </div>
 
    </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 623: Line 622:
 
<div class="div_banner">
 
<div class="div_banner">
 
<!--Right picture (the teal line on right)-->
 
<!--Right picture (the teal line on right)-->
<div class="col-sm-2 subdiv_banner left">
+
<div class="col-sm-2 subdiv_banner 2row left">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/8a/T--Exeter--Template_Banner_left.png">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/8a/T--Exeter--Template_Banner_left.png">
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 634: Line 633:
 
 
 
<!--Give span class "oneline" or "twoline" depending on how llong the section text is-->
 
<!--Give span class "oneline" or "twoline" depending on how llong the section text is-->
<a href="#section_1" class="banner_link col-xs-6 col-sm-3"><span class="oneline">Overview</span></a>
+
<a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Exeter/Integrated_Practices/lab" class="banner_link col-xs-6"><span class="oneline">Integrated: Kill Switch</span></a>
<a href="#section_2" class="banner_link col-xs-6 col-sm-3"><span class="twoline">Equality and <br />Diversity</span></a>
+
<a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Exeter/Integrated_Practices/ED" class="banner_link col-xs-6"><span class="oneline">Integrated: Equality and Diversity</span></a>
<a href="#section_3" class="banner_link col-xs-6 col-sm-3"><span class="oneline">S3</span></a>
+
<a href="#section_4" class="banner_link col-xs-6 col-sm-3"><span class="oneline">S4</span></a>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<!--Left picture (the teal line on left)-->
 
<!--Left picture (the teal line on left)-->
<div class="col-sm-2 subdiv_banner right">
+
<div class="col-sm-2 subdiv_banner 2row right">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/56/T--Exeter--Template_Banner_right.png">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/56/T--Exeter--Template_Banner_right.png">
 
</div>
 
</div>
</div>
 
<div>
 
<a id="Section_link" href="#section_1" style="display:block;margin:34vh auto 0 auto;width:14px;"><span style="color:#47BCC2;font-size: 25px;" class="glyphicon glyphicon-menu-down" aria-hidden="true"></span></a>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
<div class="col-xs-12 div_content">
+
<div id="section_1" class="link_fix"></div>
+
<!-- <div class="col-xs-12 div_content">
 +
<div id="section_2" class="link_fix"></div>
 
<div id="contentTitle">
 
<div id="contentTitle">
Overview
+
Lab intergration
 
</div>
 
</div>
               
+
<h6>Lab Integration:</h6>
                <p id="pp">We approached our Integrated Human Practices from two perspectives: the traditional, integrating the Human Practices into the lab project; and the unconventional, integrating the human practices into itself. We thought we could make the biggest impact in both Human Practices and the lab if we provided cohesive, reassured arguments for our methods. </p>
+
 
+
                <h6>Lab Integration:</h6>
+
 
                  
 
                  
 
                 <p id="pp">By interviewing academic and industry researchers about their understanding of kill switches, we could analyse whether they are effective biosafety mechanisms and if they are appropriate for use in either industry or academic research.</p>
 
                 <p id="pp">By interviewing academic and industry researchers about their understanding of kill switches, we could analyse whether they are effective biosafety mechanisms and if they are appropriate for use in either industry or academic research.</p>
Line 662: Line 655:
 
                 <p id="pp">Dr Tom Ellis influenced the design of our kill switches by corroborating our theory that multiple kill switches in one system would reduce the error rate significantly - creating a fail safe, in the same way that broad spectrum antibiotics significantly reduces the chances of failure. We had planned on making an operon of KillerOrange and KillerRed, to both broaden the spectrum of light at which the reactive oxygen species are produced, but also significantly reduce the error rates of one. Dr Ellis argued that multiple kill switches in one system might have <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">less than one in a billion escape rates</q>.</p>
 
                 <p id="pp">Dr Tom Ellis influenced the design of our kill switches by corroborating our theory that multiple kill switches in one system would reduce the error rate significantly - creating a fail safe, in the same way that broad spectrum antibiotics significantly reduces the chances of failure. We had planned on making an operon of KillerOrange and KillerRed, to both broaden the spectrum of light at which the reactive oxygen species are produced, but also significantly reduce the error rates of one. Dr Ellis argued that multiple kill switches in one system might have <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">less than one in a billion escape rates</q>.</p>
 
                  
 
                  
                 <p id="pp">Due to time restraints with our project we decided to focus on providing significant analysis on the kill switches individually, however advice from Markus Geshater of Synthase Limited indicating that multiple kill switches in one system would be unfeasible and the different systems would need to be truly orthogonal to be effective. He explained that if in an industrial setting your synthetic system is producing a protein, then having one or multiple kill switches that are reliant on protein production would reduce the efficiency of production of your desired protein. Furthermore these kill switches could potentially be circumvented by the overexpression of a useful enzyme that is being commercially produced. Consequently, we felt assured in dropping the idea of a multiple kill switch system, because, as our kill switches rely heavily on protein production, and we want to provide analysis for future teams wanting to use kill switches in the future, if their synthetic systems relied on protein production, then our kill switches would be unfeasible. Instead we looked to design three distinct kill switches to test the efficiency of enzymatic, metabolic and DNA degradating mechanisms</p>
+
                 <p id="pp">Due to time restraints with our project we decided to focus on providing significant analysis on the kill switches individually, however advice from Markus Geshater of Synthase Limited indicating that multiple kill switches in one system would be unfeasible and the different systems would need to be truly orthogonal to be effective. He explained that if in an industrial setting your synthetic system is producing a protein, then having one or multiple kill switches that are reliant on protein production would reduce the efficiency of production of your desired protein. Furthermore these kill switches could potentially be circumvented by the overexpression of a useful enzyme that is being commercially produced. Consequently, we felt assured in dropping the idea for a multiple kill switch system because our kill switches relied heavily on protein production and thus would reduce the efficiency of the product in an industrial setting. Instead of looking at multiple kill switches in the same system we looked to design three distinct kill switches to test and compare the efficiency of enzymatic, metabolic and DNA degrading mechanisms</p>
  
 
<div class="row" style="padding-top:20px">
 
<div class="row" style="padding-top:20px">
Line 671: Line 664:
 
Your browser does not support the video tag.
 
Your browser does not support the video tag.
 
</video>
 
</video>
</div>              
+
</div>
  
 
+
<br />
<h6>Outreach Integration:</h6>
+
               
+
                <p id="pp">We have extensive public engagement and education work in our Human Practices section, focusing early on how to best to influence the public in both lower and higher education on engaging with and understanding synthetic biology. But for the equality and diversity section of the Human Practices, we needed to created a well reasoned and grounded project, which both highlights the work of academics at the university and shapes more grounded opinions of equality and diversity in science. Consequently, we wanted to integrate each individual interview into the next, drawing from ideas from previous interviews, so we could properly discuss the problem of gender inequality and the issues raised by both academics and students. This is the best way to create a discussion between the academics as they are providing analysis and personal insight on the opinion and experiences of the academic before. It also allows us to discuss in depth, issues such as the problems associated with maternity and paternity leave in science or the need for massive social and structural change.</p>
+
               
+
                <p id="pp">We also wanted to go some way to integrate the public engagement and education sections into itself, evolving the project as we go. The board game developed through a series of prototypes to the version we have now; we plan on improving it after this year’s iGEM is concluded. The insight of the teachers and students at both the schools we visited and the science fairs shaped the we designed the gameplay of BioMech, as we used them as focus groups, testing all aspects of the board game. For example, from the first addition that we tested at The Judd School, whilst the students thought the 3D printed counters were a good and fun idea, they and the teachers recognised that they would be easily lost; as the game progressed, the game would become more cluttered with more counters used. Furthermore, the students found the original colour matching rules difficult to understand and so we simplified them. </p>
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
 
+
</div>
+
 
 
 
<div>
 
<div>
<a id="Section_link" href="#section_2" style="display:block;margin:20px auto 0 auto;width:14px;"><span style="color:#47BCC2;font-size: 25px;" class="glyphicon glyphicon-menu-down" aria-hidden="true"></span></a>
+
<a id="Section_link" href="#section_3" style="display:block;margin:20px auto 0 auto;width:14px;"><span style="color:#47BCC2;font-size: 25px;" class="glyphicon glyphicon-menu-down" aria-hidden="true"></span></a>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
+
</div>
 +
 
<div class="col-xs-12 div_content">
 
<div class="col-xs-12 div_content">
<div id="section_2" class="link_fix"></div>
+
<div id="section_3" class="link_fix"></div>
 
<div id="contentTitle">
 
<div id="contentTitle">
Equality and Diversity
+
Student opinions
 
</div>
 
</div>
<h5>Background</h5>
+
 
 +
<h6>Outreach Integration:</h6>
 +
               
 +
                <p id="pp">We have extensive public engagement and education work in our Human Practices section. We focused early on how to best to influence the public in both lower and higher education with regards to engaging and understanding synthetic biology. For the equality and diversity section of the Human Practices, we needed to created a well reasoned and grounded project, which both highlights the work of academics at the university and shapes more educated opinions on equality and diversity in science. Consequently, we aimed to integrate each individual interview into the next, drawing from ideas from previous interviews, so we could properly discuss the problem of gender inequality and the issues raised by both academics and students. We found this to be the best way to create a discussion between the academics as they are providing analysis and personal insight on the opinion based on their experiences and the experiences of the previous academics. This approach also allowed us to discuss in depth issues such as the problems associated with maternity and paternity leave in science and whether there is a need for massive social and structural change.</p>
 +
               
 +
                <p id="pp">We also wanted to integrate the public engagement and education sections into themselves and as a consequence evolve the project as we went. Our board game, BioMech, was developed through a series of prototypes to the version we have now. We plan on further it after this year’s iGEM is concluded. The insight of the teachers and students at both the schools we visited as well as the science fairs shaped the way we designed the gameplay of BioMech. We used the people attending these events as focus groups, testing all aspects of BioMech. For example, from our first test at The Judd School we realised that even though we like using 3D printed shapes as counters, they cluttered the board space too much. The teachers also brought up how the counters would be easily lost or how they were even potential choking hazards. As a result we got rid of them. Furthermore, the students found the original colour matching rules difficult to understand and so we simplified them. </p>
 +
 
 +
<h5>Background</h5>
 
<p id="pp">
 
<p id="pp">
The fundamental reason for targeting equality and diversity within science, is that synthetic biology has the chance to be hierarchically and systematically equal from the beginning. If those working in the field can encourage the importance of diversity to younger generations, then when synthetic biology becomes more well recognised publicly as a field of science, it has the possibility of being known for its progressive nature towards gender, racial and socio-economical equality.  
+
The fundamental reason we have for targeting equality and diversity within science, is that synthetic biology has the chance to be hierarchically and systematically equal from the beginning. If those working in the field can encourage the importance of diversity to younger generations, then when synthetic biology becomes better recognised publicly as a field of science, it has the possibility of being known for its progressive nature towards gender, racial and socio-economical equality.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p id="pp">
 
<p id="pp">
We started our work on Equality and Diversity after we spoke to Dr Robert Smith of Kings College London, at the UK iGEM meetup in Westminster. He spoke to us about our progress with Human Practices and some the successes we have already had, however he emphasised that our idea for a study into diversity and equality in science had not really been performed, to his knowledge, at iGEM before. We therefore thought that we have the possibility of making a significant impact in the field by highlighting and addressing some of the issues surrounding a lack of gender equality and diversity in science overall.  
+
We started our work on Equality and Diversity after we spoke to Dr Robert Smith of Kings College London, at the UK iGEM meetup in Westminster. He spoke to us about our progress with Human Practices and some of the successes we had already had. He emphasised that our idea for a study into diversity and equality in science had not really been performed, to his knowledge, at iGEM before, much like our work on the importance of understanding what a kill switch is. We therefore thought that we have the possibility of making a significant impact in this field by highlighting and addressing some of the issues surrounding a lack of gender equality and diversity in science overall.  
 
<br />
 
<br />
The original plan was to create a short video highlighting the some of the issues surrounding a lack of gender equality in science and demonstrating what synthetic biology could do to address these wider issues. Dr Smith encouraged that we could look more broadly at diversity in science as well, emphasising that the problem doesn’t just stem from gender inequality, but also from a lack of diversity in terms of ethnicity, religion, disability and background.  
+
The original plan was to create a short video highlighting the some of the issues surrounding a lack of gender equality in science and demonstrating what could be done in synthetic biology to address these issues. Dr Smith encouraged us to look more broadly at diversity in science as well, emphasising that the problem doesn’t just stem from gender inequality, but also from a lack of diversity in terms of ethnicity, religion, disability and background.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p id="pp">
 
<p id="pp">
Using statistics gained from the Equality and Diversity office at the University of Exeter, and further statistics on gender inequality within the College of Life and Environmental Sciences (CLES) and the College of Engineering Mathematics and Physical Sciences (CEMPS) provided by Athena Swan, we want to highlight the problem with inequality and diversity to a wider audience.  
+
Using the University of Exeter as a case study for universities in the UK, we want to highlight if there is a problem with diversity and inequality by exposing the issue to a wider audience.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p id="pp">
 
<p id="pp">
Line 750: Line 743:
 
Your browser does not support the video tag.
 
Your browser does not support the video tag.
 
</video>
 
</video>
</div>
 
  
<br />
+
 
<h6>What is being done?</h6>
+
<p id="pp">
+
<div>
 +
<a id="Section_link" href="#section_4" style="display:block;margin:20px auto 0 auto;width:14px;"><span style="color:#47BCC2;font-size: 25px;" class="glyphicon glyphicon-menu-down" aria-hidden="true"></span></a>
 +
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="col-xs-12 div_content">
 +
<div id="section_4" class="link_fix"></div>
 +
<div id="contentTitle">
 +
Academics
 +
</div>
 +
<style>
 +
ul{
 +
list-style-image:none;
 +
}
 +
.container ul{
 +
padding-top:20px;
 +
padding-right:40px;
 +
padding-left:80px;
 +
font-size:150%;
 +
}
 +
.container ul li {
 +
    /* Text color */
 +
    color: #333;
 +
    list-style-type: none;
 +
}
 +
 
 +
.container ul li:before {
 +
    /* Unicode bullet symbol */
 +
    content: '\25AA';
 +
    /* Bullet color */
 +
    color: #47BCC2;
 +
    padding-right: 0.5em;
 +
}
 +
ol{
 +
padding-top:20px;
 +
padding-right:40px;
 +
padding-left:80px;
 +
font-size:150%;
 +
}
 +
ol li {
 +
    /* Text color */
 +
    color: #333;
 +
    list-style-type: none;
 +
}
 +
ol li {
 +
    list-style-type: none;
 +
    counter-increment: list;
 +
    position: relative;
 +
}
 +
 
 +
ol li:before {
 +
    content: counter(list) ".";
 +
    position: absolute;
 +
    left: -2.5em;
 +
    width: 2em;
 +
    text-align: right;
 +
    color: #47BCC2;
 +
}
 +
</style>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
                <ol id="Academiclist">
 +
                    <li><a href="#DrAG" >Dr Andrew Griffiths</a></li>
 +
                    <li><a href="#DrES" >Dr Eduarda Santos</a></li>
 +
                    <li><a href="#DrCL" >Dr Ceri Lewis</a></li>
 +
                    <li><a href="#DrSD" >Dr Sharon Dixon</a></li>
 +
                    <li><a href="#DrRW" >Dr Rob Wilson</a></li>
 +
                    <li><a href="#ProfMR" >Professor Michelle Ryan</a></li>
 +
                </ol>
 +
 
 +
<br id="DrAG">
 +
<p id="pp">
 
<strong>
 
<strong>
 
Interview with Dr Andrew Griffiths - Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity lead for Biosciences at the University of Exeter:
 
Interview with Dr Andrew Griffiths - Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity lead for Biosciences at the University of Exeter:
Line 760: Line 822:
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p id="pp">
 
<p id="pp">
On 24/08/16 we met with Dr Andrew Griffiths to talk about his role as the current Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity lead for Biosciences at the University and what he thinks could be done to improve these areas within the department. By talking to the point of contact to staff about these issues, we can understand what sort of issues are brought up recurringly, and what the university is doing to address these issues.  
+
On 24/08/16 we met with Dr Andrew Griffiths to talk about his role as the current Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity lead for Biosciences at the University and what he thinks could be done to improve these areas within the department. By talking to the point of contact to staff about these issues, we can understand what sort of recurring issues are brought up, and what the university is doing to address these issues.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<h5>
 
<h5>
Line 780: Line 842:
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<h5>
 
<h5>
<q style="margin:auto;display:block;"><i>Perhaps we should trying to promote paternity leave allowing flexibility for men to look after the children so the burden doesn’t fall on women all the time.</i></q>
+
<q style="margin:auto;display:block;"><i>Perhaps we should try to promote paternity leave allowing flexibility for men to look after the children so the burden doesn’t fall on women all the time.</i></q>
 
</h5>
 
</h5>
 
<p id="pp">
 
<p id="pp">
Line 809: Line 871:
 
Your browser does not support the video tag.
 
Your browser does not support the video tag.
 
</video>
 
</video>
</div>
+
                <p id="pp"><a href="#Academiclist" >Back to list</a></p>
<p id="pp">
+
<br id="DrES">
 +
<p id="pp">
 
<strong>
 
<strong>
 
Meeting with Dr Eduarda Santos - former Equality and Diversity lead for Biosicences
 
Meeting with Dr Eduarda Santos - former Equality and Diversity lead for Biosicences
Line 825: Line 888:
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p id="pp">
 
<p id="pp">
Consequently, we are again led to question whether shared parental leave would relieve some of this pressure put on women? In fact, the ‘Swedish model’ of parental leave and balancing career with family commitments shows some very desirable qualities that employers would look for: ability to multitask (especially under pressure), commitment to career, etc. However, Dr Santos warned us about attributing the fact that fewer women are taking up jobs in higher up roles within Bioscience to maternity leave - <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">Maternity is an easy excuse</q>.
+
We were again led to question whether shared parental leave would relieve some of this pressure put on women? In fact, the ‘Swedish model’ of parental leave and balancing career with family commitments shows some very desirable qualities that employers would look for: ability to multitask (especially under pressure), commitment to career, etc. However, Dr Santos warned us about attributing the fact that fewer women are taking up jobs in higher up roles within Bioscience to maternity leave - <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">Maternity is an easy excuse</q>.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p id="pp">
 
<p id="pp">
Line 834: Line 897:
 
</h5>
 
</h5>
 
<p id="pp">
 
<p id="pp">
The need for supervisors to act as role models to young, inspiring post-docs is very apparent, especially as role models are so important for undergraduates and postgraduates, so why should this stop at levels beyond this?
+
The need for supervisors to act as role models to young, aspiring post-docs is very apparent, especially as role models are so important for undergraduates and postgraduates, so why should this stop at levels beyond this?
 
<br />
 
<br />
To conclude this meeting, we asked Dr Santos what she thinks needs to be done to improve gender equality in science and her response was thus:
+
To conclude this meeting, we asked Dr Santos what she thinks needs to be done to improve gender equality in science and her response was as follows:
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<ul id="pp">
 
<ul id="pp">
Line 852: Line 915:
 
</li>
 
</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
+
                 <p id="pp"><a href="#Academiclist" >Back to list</a></p>
                 <p id="pp">
+
<br id="DrCL">
 +
<p id="pp">
 
<strong>
 
<strong>
 
Meeting with Dr Ceri Lewis - Senior lecturer in marine biology and tutor
 
Meeting with Dr Ceri Lewis - Senior lecturer in marine biology and tutor
Line 865: Line 929:
  
 
                 <h5>
 
                 <h5>
<q style="margin:auto;display:block;"><i>She would never make it in science unless she learnt to give a talk without sounding like a silly little school girl</i></q>
+
<q style="margin:auto;display:block;"><i>She would never make it in science unless she learns to give a talk without sounding like a silly little schoolgirl</i></q>
 
</h5>
 
</h5>
  
                 <p id="pp">This is shocking to think that a female role model would feel this is an appropriate comment for a nervous but aspiring young, female scientist. Dr Lewis argued that you could <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">never imagine a man being told he gave a bad talk because of a mannerism</q>never imagine a man being told he gave a bad talk because of a mannerism and this kind of advice and influence has the potential to destroy all confidence in an individual.</p>
+
                 <p id="pp">It is shocking to think that a female role model would feel this is an appropriate comment for a nervous, but aspiring, young scientist. Dr Lewis argued that you could <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">never imagine a man being told he gave a bad talk because of a mannerism</q> and this kind of advice and influence has the potential to destroy all confidence in an individual.</p>
  
 
                 <p id="pp">Confidence is something Dr Lewis stressed needed addressing. In the initial interview with Dr Griffiths, he spoke of the difficulty in addressing womens’ confidence and how it might affect them applying to senior roles, however here, Dr Lewis argued that good role models and mentors are required throughout a student’s life to guide them in the right direction and to give them the confidence in their own abilities from the beginning.   
 
                 <p id="pp">Confidence is something Dr Lewis stressed needed addressing. In the initial interview with Dr Griffiths, he spoke of the difficulty in addressing womens’ confidence and how it might affect them applying to senior roles, however here, Dr Lewis argued that good role models and mentors are required throughout a student’s life to guide them in the right direction and to give them the confidence in their own abilities from the beginning.   
Line 877: Line 941:
 
</h5>
 
</h5>
  
                 <p id="pp">Considering the problems that we have heard from different academics at the university about establishing yourself in science as a woman, it is understandable why this in-built confidence in your own ability is very hard to attain. Interestingly Dr Lewis highlighted that there is an <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">ingrained difference</q> and that many academic situations are <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">built around the male world</q>. For example, presentations. She had observed many male tutees stand up and be naturally confident in their ability to talk in front of a crowd, however, she noted that it is more intimidating for the female tutees. Consequently, we have to consider if universities are doing enough to promote confidence in all students.</p>
+
                 <p id="pp">Considering the problems that we have heard from different academics at the university about establishing yourself in science as a woman, it is understandable why this in-built confidence in your own ability is very hard to attain. Interestingly Dr Lewis highlighted that there is a <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">ingrained difference</q> and that many academic situations are <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">built around the male world</q>. For example, presentations. She had observed many male tutees stand up and be naturally confident in their ability to talk in front of a crowd, however, she noted that it is more intimidating for the female tutees. Consequently, we have to consider if universities are doing enough to promote confidence in all students.</p>
  
 
                 <p id="pp">There was a statistic, highlighted by Dr Lewis, that if men and women were applying for the same job, the male candidates would tend to apply if they met 5 out of the 10 criteria whereas the female candidates would only apply if they had met 9 or all 10 criteria. Considering this, it seems that higher institutions are not doing enough to inspire confidence in all their students and there is this bias towards one gender.</p>
 
                 <p id="pp">There was a statistic, highlighted by Dr Lewis, that if men and women were applying for the same job, the male candidates would tend to apply if they met 5 out of the 10 criteria whereas the female candidates would only apply if they had met 9 or all 10 criteria. Considering this, it seems that higher institutions are not doing enough to inspire confidence in all their students and there is this bias towards one gender.</p>
Line 916: Line 980:
 
                 <p id="pp">It might seem that from these shocking personal accounts of gender inequality and ingrained lack of confidence in female students, nothing is being done by the university to make a difference, however with the work of Athena Swan, more women are getting a voice in science. The university are encouraging leadership and mentoring courses for women so they can compete with all their peers. All three of Dr Griffiths, Dr Santos and Dr Lewis have highlighted the work of the University on improving equality, diversity and inclusivity but it must not be forgotten that there is still inherent gender inequality and as Dr Lewis showed, intelligent female scientists still feel unworthy of applying for top quality jobs in science. This is something that needs to change.</p>
 
                 <p id="pp">It might seem that from these shocking personal accounts of gender inequality and ingrained lack of confidence in female students, nothing is being done by the university to make a difference, however with the work of Athena Swan, more women are getting a voice in science. The university are encouraging leadership and mentoring courses for women so they can compete with all their peers. All three of Dr Griffiths, Dr Santos and Dr Lewis have highlighted the work of the University on improving equality, diversity and inclusivity but it must not be forgotten that there is still inherent gender inequality and as Dr Lewis showed, intelligent female scientists still feel unworthy of applying for top quality jobs in science. This is something that needs to change.</p>
  
                 <p id="pp">
+
 
 +
<div class="row" style="padding-top:20px">
 +
<video style="margin:auto;display:block;width:50%;" controls>
 +
<source src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/8e/T--Exeter--Integrated_CLmp4.mp4" type="video/mp4">
 +
<source src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/f5/T--Exeter--Integrated_CLogg.ogg" type="video/ogg">
 +
 +
Your browser does not support the video tag.
 +
</video>
 +
</div>
 +
                 <p id="pp"><a href="#Academiclist" >Back to list</a></p>
 +
<br id="DrSD">
 +
<p id="pp">
 
<strong>
 
<strong>
 
Meeting with Dr Sharon Dixon - Head of the Inclusivity Group at the University of Exeter
 
Meeting with Dr Sharon Dixon - Head of the Inclusivity Group at the University of Exeter
Line 934: Line 1,009:
 
</h5>
 
</h5>
  
                 <p id="pp">This confirms some of our fears about the fight to change equality and diversity in science. when we began working on equality and diversity, we had the view to look at diversity in science as a whole, however, the more people we spoke to the more we looked into gender inequality and the more we saw how much of a problem it was. Therefore we can understand why the university would be focusing so much on improving gender equality, however if gender has become the only issue then we cannot condone that. Dr Dixon went on to talk about the new Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity group was set up to combat other issues like disability, sexuality and ethnicity.</p>
+
                 <p id="pp">This confirms some of our fears about the fight to change equality and diversity in science. When we began working on equality and diversity, we had the view to look at diversity in science as a whole, however, the more people we spoke to the more we looked into gender inequality and the more we saw how much of a problem it was. Therefore we can understand why the university would be focusing so much on improving gender equality, however if gender has become the only issue then we cannot condone that. Dr Dixon went on to talk about the new Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity group was set up to combat other issues like disability, sexuality and ethnicity.</p>
  
 
                 <h5>
 
                 <h5>
Line 940: Line 1,015:
 
</h5>
 
</h5>
  
                 <p id="pp">Dr Dixon echoed many of the views raised by Dr Lewis, of the importance of role models and mentors to the development of both students and academic staff. Dr Dixon did stress however that mentors and role models do not need to be gender specific, and this may be a way of changing the more unconscious biases in gender. If we encourage people that a mentor can be someone who has experience of certain experiences that you require help with, no matter the gender, then you might be able to reduce the pressure on certain individuals. </p>
+
                 <p id="pp">Dr Dixon echoed many of the views raised by Dr Lewis, of the importance of role models and mentors to the development of both students and academic staff. Dr Dixon did stress however that mentors and role models do not need to be gender specific, and this may be a way of changing the more unconscious biases in gender. If we encourage people that a mentor can be someone who has experience of certain areas that you require help with, no matter the gender, then you might be able to reduce the pressure on certain individuals. </p>
  
 
                 <h5>
 
                 <h5>
Line 946: Line 1,021:
 
</h5>
 
</h5>
  
                 <p id="pp">From the initial interview with Dr Griffiths, to the interview with Dr Lewis, all academics have spoken about giving women more confidence in putting themselves up for promotion, however, Dr Dixon had a different perspective. She recognised that more needs to be done to give support to women and give them confidence to apply for more senior roles, however, she indicated that university culture was actually affecting the health of men, due to the pressure of promotion:</p>
+
                 <p id="pp">From the initial interview with Dr Griffiths, to the interview with Dr Lewis, all academics have spoken about giving women more confidence in putting themselves up for promotion, however Dr Dixon had a different perspective. She recognised that more needs to be done to give support to women and give them confidence to apply for more senior roles, however, she indicated that university culture was actually affecting the health of men, due to the pressure of promotion:</p>
  
 
                 <h5>
 
                 <h5>
Line 975: Line 1,050:
 
</h5>
 
</h5>
  
                 <p id="pp">
+
 +
                 <p id="pp"><a href="#Academiclist" >Back to list</a></p>
 +
<br id="DrRW">
 +
<p id="pp">
 
<strong>
 
<strong>
 
Meeting with Dr Rob Wilson - Chair of Athena Swan Working Group at University of Exeter
 
Meeting with Dr Rob Wilson - Chair of Athena Swan Working Group at University of Exeter
Line 1,029: Line 1,107:
 
</h5>  
 
</h5>  
  
                 <p id="pp">
+
<div class="row" style="padding-top:20px">
 +
<video style="margin:auto;display:block;width:50%;" controls>
 +
<source src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/58/T--Exeter--Integrated_RWmp4.mp4" type="video/mp4">
 +
<source src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/c3/T--Exeter--Integrated_RWogg.ogg" type="video/ogg">
 +
 +
Your browser does not support the video tag.
 +
</video>
 +
 
 +
                 <p id="pp"><a href="#Academiclist" >Back to list</a></p>
 +
<br id="ProfMR">
 +
<p id="pp">
 +
 
 
<strong>
 
<strong>
 
Meeting with Professor Michelle Ryan - Professor of Social and Organisational Psychology, Dean of Postgraduate Research and Director of University of Exeter Doctoral College
 
Meeting with Professor Michelle Ryan - Professor of Social and Organisational Psychology, Dean of Postgraduate Research and Director of University of Exeter Doctoral College
Line 1,110: Line 1,199:
 
                 <p id="pp">Overall, we have examined the work of academics at this university who attempt to improve equality and diversity, at their different levels, in science. They have greatly informed us on the problems with gender inequality as well as how the university is, and plans on tackling the problem. </p>
 
                 <p id="pp">Overall, we have examined the work of academics at this university who attempt to improve equality and diversity, at their different levels, in science. They have greatly informed us on the problems with gender inequality as well as how the university is, and plans on tackling the problem. </p>
  
<h5>What is ‘diversity’?</h5>
+
 
<br />
+
<br />
+
<h5>The Gender Study - A Future Project</h5>
+
<p id="pp">
+
Paris Bettencourt in 2013 provided a detailed study of gender distribution in synthetic biology and iGEM. They found that women were not as represented as men within iGEM and equally there were fewer female supervisors of iGEM teams. They provided data to suggest that there is a significantly higher proportion of women to men in teams that win prizes compared with teams that don’t. They concluded their study with suggestions of how to improve the gender distribution within synthetic biology and iGEM, proposing that bonus points could given to teams with female supervisors, and iGEM should promote larger teams with more female judges, in the hope that this would improve the gender distribution within teams.
+
</p>
+
<p id="pp">
+
Our aim was to conduct a follow up study, looking at the distribution of male to female students and supervisors in iGEM teams in 2016. We wanted to compare the statistics to those gathered in 2013 to determine whether Paris Bettencourt’s Gender Study was successful in improving equality within iGEM. Then, if our study showed that there was a significant balancing of the distribution then it could indicate that small, impactful studies, like Paris Bettencourt’s, could be the key to improving gender distribution and diversity within the field and thus more teams should take up the mantle and work to improve equality and diversity. If, however, there was no significant improvement, then we would have to question whether this is due to a lack of follow on studies compounding the data, or if small scale studies, performed by iGEM teams, can ever be enough to make a significant change in the field.
+
</p>
+
<p id="pp">
+
Due to time restraints, we will be unable to undertake this follow-up gender study, however we challenge future iGEM teams, who struggle with Human Practices, to look at the impact they could make locally and nationally in equality and diversity, and perform a follow up study to Paris Bettencourt’s from 2013. We believe that iGEM teams have a fantastic opportunity to make a significant difference in this areas by highlighting the work of academics and researchers at their university working to achieve greater equality in their field of science, or in science as a whole. We also challenge iGEM to look more at ways of improving and encouraging greater diversity, so that synthetic biology can be recognised as a positive, progressive field of science and one that acts as a representative to the individual core subjects that make up it.
+
</p>
+
+
+
 
<div>
 
<div>
<a id="Section_link" href="#section_3" style="display:block;margin:20px auto 0 auto;width:14px;"><span style="color:#47BCC2;font-size: 25px;" class="glyphicon glyphicon-menu-down" aria-hidden="true"></span></a>
+
<a id="Section_link" href="#section_5" style="display:block;margin:20px auto 0 auto;width:14px;"><span style="color:#47BCC2;font-size: 25px;" class="glyphicon glyphicon-menu-down" aria-hidden="true"></span></a>
 
</div>
 
</div>
</div>
+
 
 
<div class="col-xs-12 div_content">
 
<div class="col-xs-12 div_content">
<div id="section_3" class="link_fix"></div>
+
<div id="section_5" class="link_fix"></div>
 
<div id="contentTitle">
 
<div id="contentTitle">
S3
+
Panel discussion
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
 +
<h5>What is ‘diversity’?</h5>
  
+
                <p id="pp">On 14th October 2016, we held a panel discussion to open up the debate about equality and diversity in science to a wider audience. We collaborated with the campus radio channel, Xpression FM, and the campus TV channel, XTV in order to reach the widest audience possible. To conclude our work on equality and diversity, we needed to bring the work that we had highlighted from the academic interviews to the students that were represented in the first video (that highlighted students understanding to the issue). </p>
+
 
<div>
+
                <p id="pp">One of our team members, Jack, hosted the panel alongside both student and academic representatives who were qualified to give an informative understanding of the issue of gender inequality and a lack of diversity in science. There were two student representatives: Alec James, the current VP Welfare sabbatical officer for the Students Guild at the University of Exeter. His role as VP Welfare includes providing the students with a voice for making the university accessible and inclusive as he could communicate student’s issues with the leading academic boards. And Laura Howard, the University of Exeter academic representative coordinator for undergraduate students, specifically in STEM. Her role involves liaising with the student staff liaison committee (SSLC) in which STEM students who have issues with the quality of their experience get their voices heard. There were also two academic representatives: Dr Alison Hill, a senior lecturer in chemistry at the University of Exeter. Dr Hill has taken programmes like the Aurora leadership programme and is considered a mentor and role model to many, shown by her nomination for the teaching awards in 2012 and consistently high feedback ratings. Dr Rob Wilson, head of the Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity group in Biosciences at the university and senior lecturer in conservation biology. Dr Wilson was one of the academics we interviewed and he gave a really interesting, grounded perspective on the state of affairs at the university and how it should be improved. Through this discussion, we were able to establish a two way communication with the public with questions from the floor for our expert panel. The event was shared both on Facebook, with over 200 people interested in attending, and by the university, and as it was streamed live and broadcasted live on XTV and Xpression FM respectively, we were able to reach people from all across the country.</p>
<a id="Section_link" href="#section_4" style="display:block;margin:20px auto 0 auto;width:14px;"><span style="color:#47BCC2;font-size: 25px;" class="glyphicon glyphicon-menu-down" aria-hidden="true"></span></a>
+
 
 +
                <p id="pp">The audio file can be found here:
 +
</p>
 +
 
 +
                <p id="pp">The video link can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIWHUrHcjoc</p>
 +
 
 +
                <h6>Key Points:</h6>
 +
 
 +
                <p id="pp">We tried to cover the key points that were discussed in the section that highlighted academics work on improving gender equality and diversity in their fields. Consequently we talked about issues related to the massive social and structural change needed for there to be a significant difference as well as specific points like the importance of role models, mentors and the problem of gender distribution at higher levels of science.</p>
 +
 
 +
                <p id="pp">We began the discussion with the relatively simple question of 'what is diversity?’. Many people have a very narrow view of what diversity is, mostly commenting on gender, ethnicity, religion and socio-economic background. Laura viewed the definition of diversity as:</p>
 +
 
 +
              <h5>
 +
<q style="margin:auto;display:block;"><i>Getting representation from people of all different backgrounds, whether that be racially, sexual orientation, gender, socio-economic background. It is just representing people who are different</i></q>
 +
</h5>
 +
 
 +
                <p id="pp">This goes further than organisations like the Royal Society of Biology and the Institute of physics who, whilst declaring they want to make their fields as equality, diverse and inclusive as possible, predominantly represent gender, ethnicity, disability and socio-economic background as diversity. Alec went further saying:</p>
 +
 
 +
                <h5>
 +
<q style="margin:auto;display:block;"><i>It is the whole core of who we are: where we come from, our background, gender, religion, our sexuality, but also hobbies, interests, friends and families</i></q>
 +
</h5>
 +
 
 +
                <p id="pp">This is more in line with the Royal Society of Chemistry’s definition which includes: age, marriage/civil partnership, pregnancy, first language and geography amongst the more inclusive definition of diversity. We wanted to understand whether universities are doing enough to promote this kind of inclusivity and accessibility but individually what both the students and academics were doing to make university accessible.</p>         
 +
 
 +
                <h5>
 +
<q style="margin:auto;display:block;"><i>The universities are responding both to the opinions of the students and the staff in (scientific) bodies, but also the top down drivers...Are they doing enough? They are starting to improve the amount they are doing</i><br / > <span id="afQuote" style="padding-left:0;"> -Dr Rob Wilson</span></q>
 +
</h5>
 +
 
 +
                <p id="pp">This echoes much of what we heard from academics previously, that there is a significant improvement to equality and diversity, but there is still a long way to go. Alec James emphasised these points saying: <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">It’s the responsibility of the university to remove those barriers, so that everyone has the opportunity to come here and the university has Widening Participation high on their agenda</q>. What was interesting is that Dr Hill highlighted how the university is changing the way it takes new students into the university considering the socio-economic status, in an attempt to make the university more diverse, which is a very positive, forward perspective. However, Laura had a stark opposing view:</p>
 +
 
 +
                <h5>
 +
<q style="margin:auto;display:block;"><i>I would disagree in saying the university does enough to drive diversity. I was one of two other black girls on my course, and that is quite sad to see</i></q>
 +
</h5>
 +
 
 +
                <p id="pp">Laura did go on to say that she recognises the university is working hard on Widening Participation activities and there is improvement, but her opinion stands out as shocking, and a reminder that we have to have a significant improvement in inclusivity for the effects to be widely shown and felt. The discussion went on to talk about whether the university was excluding students through events like the recent Snowsports White T-shirt social in which offensive comments were exposed, and conclusively both academics and students completely condemned this behaviour, and encouraged that measures were being put in place to prevent this from happening again.</p>
 +
 
 +
                <p id="pp">Dr Rob Wilson reiterated the importance of the Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity group especially at changing the gender distribution between the stages from undergraduate to professorial roles. Dr Hill highlighted another problem with this distribution, in that part time academics find it very difficult to progress to the professor level. There is a large number of women who are on the education and scholarship route, which makes it very difficult to be promoted to associate professor, because staff need to have a senior management role to be promoted. Therefore Dr Hill argued that:</p>
 +
 
 +
                <h5>
 +
<q style="margin:auto;display:block;"><i>The lack of leadership roles for women that prevent them from being promoted to the senior positions</i></q>
 +
</h5>
 +
 
 +
                <p id="pp">The discussion went on to talk more about the unconscious bias and whether attitudes growing up significantly affected people’s opinions now. Laura highlighted that <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">it is not being taught well enough in schools so people need to do it themselves</q>, meaning that we all should be more conscious and more aware of what might offend someone, because society has not progressed to the point where acceptance and understanding is taught to a sufficient level. Dr Wilson went on to argue that the path we map out for ourselves <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">depends very much on the people we see as our role models</q> and so he emphasised the importance that the University has a large number of <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">diverse role models</q> for students, which echoes what Dr Dixon and Prof. Ryan had said in their interviews.</p>
 +
 
 +
                <h5>
 +
<q style="margin:auto;display:block;"><i>We have to be careful with benevolent sexism, where we think that maybe this person wants to spend more time with their family so let’s give them some roles that don’t give them opportunity</i><span id="afQuote" style="padding-left:0;"> -Dr Rob Wilson</span></q>
 +
</h5>
 +
 
 +
                <p id="pp">This was in response to questions about maternity leave and how attitudes need to change in order for there to be an increase in the number of women at higher roles. We previously heard Dr Santos in our meeting with her talk about how academics use maternity as an <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">easy excuse</q> and Dr Wilson is reiterating that this kind of attitude is present among academics and it needs to change. </p>
 +
 
 +
                <p id="pp">In questions from the floor, a student asked what the university has lined up as a long term solution to prevent offensive activities like the white T-shirt social scandal from happening again, and excluding students from the university. Alec James responded by saying the staff at the Students Guild (the Student Union) are <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">starting a research project looking into the diversity of their leadership and why it is what it is</q>. Laura Howard went on to say:</p>
 +
 
 +
                <h5>
 +
<q style="margin:auto;display:block;"><i>We can do as much as we can to try to educate and inform people</i></q>
 +
</h5>
 +
 
 +
                <p id="pp">Interestingly this brought an alternative reaction from the academics. Dr Wilson said that <q style="padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;">the staff need educating as well. We need to know what is acceptable to say</q>, which could indicate the beginning of the social, structural change needed for there to be a difference. It is interesting that an offensive act like this one, could act as a catalyst for both staff and students to reevaluate why the university is as diverse as it is, but also it acts as a platform for significant change in attitudes, highlighted in Dr Wilson’s comments.
 +
A second question from the audience asked:</p>
 +
 
 +
                <h5>
 +
<q style="margin:auto;display:block;"><i>How do you think that universities, in particular Exeter, can reach out to local communities to make sure that disadvantaged people can reach A-levels and Open Days?</i></q>
 +
</h5>
 +
 
 +
                <p id="pp">Dr Hill responded by emphasising the University of Exeter’s role in the Exeter Maths School saying that since then, around 25% of students are going to Oxford and Cambridge. This action in setting up a maths school, which gives the students the opportunity to attend top class universities, is excellent because it shows how institutions are trying to get more students interested in physics, maths and computer science. </p>
 +
 
 +
                <p id="pp">Conclusively, this panel discussion brought forward some of the opinions and ideas that we discussed with the academics, in highlighting their work on improving gender equality in their fields. Furthermore, we managed to establish a dialogue with students and gave them a platform for further discussion on this issue, which will continue to have lasting effect. The youtube video of the talk has over 90 views, as of the 16th October, and is expected to continue rising. This work, whilst concluded for our iGEM team, is far from over. We have highlighted the issues of gender inequality and lack of diversity at our University, however, the situation may be significantly worse at universities across the country and the globe. We hope that future Exeter iGEM teams take up the mantle, and try to make a significant difference in gender equality at the University. We hope with more discussions like this, and more work that shows the academics and students trying to make a difference, we can kickstart the social and structural change necessary for there to be a significant improvement in attitudes in the UK. The more people that are made aware of the issue, the more potential for action to take place.</p>
 +
 
 +
                <p id="pp">We hope that future iGEM teams will look at the is research and approach more Universities, scientific bodies and even the government, to ask what they are willing to do to make a difference?
 +
</p>
 +
 
 +
 +
</div>
 +
<div>
 +
<a id="Section_link" href="#section_6" style="display:block;margin:20px auto 0 auto;width:14px;"><span style="color:#47BCC2;font-size: 25px;" class="glyphicon glyphicon-menu-down" aria-hidden="true"></span></a>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
<div class="col-xs-12 div_content">
+
<div class="col-xs-12 div_content">
<div id="section_4" class="link_fix"></div>
+
<div id="section_6" class="link_fix"></div>
 
<div id="contentTitle">
 
<div id="contentTitle">
S4
+
Future
 
</div>
 
</div>
+
<h5>The Gender Study - A Future Project</h5>
 
+
<p id="pp">
+
Paris Bettencourt in 2013 provided a detailed study of gender distribution in synthetic biology and iGEM. They found that women were not as represented as men within iGEM and equally there were fewer female supervisors of iGEM teams. They provided data to suggest that there is a significantly higher proportion of women to men in teams that win prizes compared with teams that don’t. They concluded their study with suggestions of how to improve the gender distribution within synthetic biology and iGEM, proposing that bonus points could given to teams with female supervisors, and iGEM should promote larger teams with more female judges, in the hope that this would improve the gender distribution within teams.
 +
</p>
 +
<p id="pp">
 +
Our aim was to conduct a follow up study, looking at the distribution of male to female students and supervisors in iGEM teams in 2016. We wanted to compare the statistics to those gathered in 2013 to determine whether Paris Bettencourt’s Gender Study was successful in improving equality within iGEM. Then, if our study showed that there was a significant balancing of the distribution then it could indicate that small, impactful studies, like Paris Bettencourt’s, could be the key to improving gender distribution and diversity within the field and thus more teams should take up the mantle and work to improve equality and diversity. If, however, there was no significant improvement, then we would have to question whether this is due to a lack of follow on studies compounding the data, or if small scale studies, performed by iGEM teams, can ever be enough to make a significant change in the field.
 +
</p>
 +
<p id="pp">
 +
Due to time restraints, we will be unable to undertake this follow-up gender study, however we challenge future iGEM teams, who struggle with Human Practices, to look at the impact they could make locally and nationally in equality and diversity, and perform a follow up study to Paris Bettencourt’s from 2013. We believe that iGEM teams have a fantastic opportunity to make a significant difference in this area by highlighting the work of academics and researchers at their university working to achieve greater equality, diversity and inclusivity in their field of science, or in science as a whole. We also challenge iGEM to look more at ways of improving and encouraging greater diversity, so that synthetic biology can be recognised as a positive, progressive field of science and one that acts as a representative to the individual core subjects that make up it.
 +
</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
+
</div>
+
 +
-->
 +
</div><!--This should be the container div-->
  
  

Latest revision as of 20:31, 19 October 2016