Difference between revisions of "Template:Groningen/TransformEfficiencyK8"

 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<html>
 
<html>
<article id="transform-efficiency-k8" class="collapse-h2 collapse-conditional">
+
<section>
<section>
+
<h3>Transformation Efficiency of <em>B.subtilis</em> plasmid backbone  
<h2>Transformation Efficiency of B.subtilis plasmid backbone  
+
(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>) created by iGEM LMU Munich 2012 </h3>
(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:Bba_K823023">Bba_K823023</a>) created by iGEM LMU Munich 2012 </h2>
+
+
<p>The integration vector from team LMU Munich BacillusBiobrickbox  
<p>The integration vector from team LMU Munich BacillusBiobrickbox  
+
2012 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>) can be used to integrate an insert of interest  
2012 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>) can be used to integrate an insert of interest  
+
in <em>B. subtilis</em>. The cloned insert will be integrated within the  
in B. subtilis. The cloned insert will be integrated within the  
+
amyE locus in <em>B. subtilis</em> after transformation (see figure 1 for  
amyE locus in B. subtilis after transformation (see figure 1 for  
+
the integration locus). The amyE gene encodes for the alpha-amylase  
the integration locus). The amyE gene encodes for the alpha-amylase  
+
protein, which degrades starch. After transformation with  
protein, which degrades starch. After transformation with  
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>, the AmyE locus will be interrupted by the insert. The  
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>, the AmyE locus will be interrupted by the insert. The  
+
successful integration disrupts the  ability of the bacteria to  
successful integration disrupts the  ability of the bacteria to  
+
degrade starch. </p>
degrade starch. </p>
+
+
<p>Two strains of <em>B. subtilis</em> were chosen to test the  
<p>Two strains of B. subtilis were chosen to test the  
+
transformation efficiency - <em>B. subtilis</em> 168 trp+ and <em>B. subtilis</em>
transformation efficiency - B. subtilis 168 trp+ and B. subtilis  
+
168 trp-. Each strain was transformed with three different  
168 trp-. Each strain was transformed with three different  
+
concentrations of <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>; 1 µg/ml, 100 ng/ml, 10 ng/ml. This  
concentrations of <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>; 1 µg/ml, 100 ng/ml, 10 ng/ml. This  
+
experiment was  done in triplicate. The transformation was  
experiment was  done in triplicate. The transformation was  
+
performed as indicated in <a href="/Team:Groningen/Protocols#transform-b-subtilis">Transformation of B. subtilis</a> and colonies  
performed as indicated in <a href="/Team:Groningen/Protocols#transform-b-subtilis">Transformation of B. subtilis</a> and colonies  
+
were selected on LB agar plates containing 5 μg/ml chloramphenicol.  
were selected on LB agar plates containing 5 μg/ml chloramphenicol.  
+
Subsequently 9 colonies were screened for correct integration of  
Subsequently 9 colonies were screened for correct integration of  
+
K823023 with the starch test <a href="/Team:Groningen/Protocols#Starch-test">Integration check: Starch test</a>. They were grown on  
K823023 with the starch test . They were grown on  
+
agar plates containing starch. The amylase activity of amyE is  
agar plates containing starch. The amylase activity of amyE is  
+
visible as a clear zone (halo) after addition of lugol’s iodine  
visible as a clear zone (halo) after addition of lugol’s iodine  
+
suggests the amyE gene was still intact and functional, which leads  
suggests the amyE gene was still intact and functional, which leads  
+
to the conclusion that the integration was unsuccessful. The  
to the conclusion that the integration was unsuccessful. The  
+
colonies not forming the distinctive halo suggests a successful  
colonies not forming the distinctive halo suggests a successful  
+
integration into amyE, disrupting its amylase activity which  
integration into amyE, disrupting its amylase activity which  
+
degrades starch.</p>
degrades starch.</p>
+
</section>
+
<h4>Results</h4>
<section>
+
<h3>Results</h3>
+
<p>From the transformed bacteria suspension 50 µl were plated on LB  
+
agar plates with 5 µl/ml chloramphenicol. All the plates had colony  
<p>From the transformed bacteria suspension 50 µl were plated on LB  
+
formation, as seen in figure 1 and 2.  </p>
agar plates with 5 µl/ml chloramphenicol. All the plates had colony  
+
formation, as seen in figure 1 and 2.  </p>
+
<div class="split">
+
<figure class="left flone">
<div class="split">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/00/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-1.jpg" />
<figure class="left flone">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/00/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-1.jpg" />
+
+
<figcaption>Fig. 1 Colonies after transformation of B.
+
subtilis 168 trp+ with K823023. Concentration first row is
+
1 µg, second row is 100 ng, and third is 10 ng plasmid DNA.
+
</figcaption>
+
</figure>
+
<figure class="right flone">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/50/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-2.jpg" />
+
 
+
<figcaption>Fig. 2 Colonies after transformation of B.
+
subtilis 168 trp- with K823023. Concentration first row is
+
1 µg, second row is 100 ng, and third is 10 ng plasmid
+
DNA.</figcaption>
+
</figure>
+
</div>
+
 
+
<p>After addition of lugol’s iodine, there were no clear zones
+
around any B. subtilis colonies, see figure 3. This result
+
demonstrated that the amyE locus in B. subtilis had been replaced
+
successfully. Apart from this transformation efficiency experiment,
+
our team has been using <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a> as a plasmid backbone for our
+
message and key for integration in B. subtilis.</p>
+
+
<figure>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/34/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-3.png" />
+
 
 
<figcaption>Fig. 3 Addition of lugol’s iodine to colonies grown
+
<figcaption>Fig. 1 Colonies after transformation of <em>B.
on starch plates. There is only growth on the left plate 3,4
+
subtilis</em> 168 trp+ with K823023. Concentration first row is  
and 9. On the right plate there is only growth on 1,7 and 9.
+
1 µg, second row is 100 ng, and third is 10 ng plasmid DNA.  
The other colonies might died from a too heat inoculation loop.  
+
 
</figcaption>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
 +
<figure class="right flone">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/50/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-2.jpg" />
  
<p>In addition, the colonies in the plates were counted. Plates
+
<figcaption>Fig. 2 Colonies after transformation of <em>B.
which contain a lot of colonies were divided in 16 areas as seen in
+
subtilis</em> 168 trp- with K823023. Concentration first row is
figure 4. The area with the estimated average amount of colonies
+
1 µg, second row is 100 ng, and third is 10 ng plasmid
were counted. </p>
+
DNA.</figcaption>
+
</figure>
<figure>
+
</div>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/86/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-4.jpg" />
+
  
<figcaption>Fig. 4 counting colonies after transformation. </figcaption>
+
<p>After addition of lugol’s iodine, there were no clear zones
</figure>
+
around any <em>B. subtilis</em> colonies, see figure 3. This result
 +
demonstrated that the amyE locus in <em>B. subtilis</em> had been replaced
 +
successfully. Apart from this transformation efficiency experiment,
 +
our team has been using <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a> as a plasmid backbone for our
 +
message and key for integration in <em>B. subtilis</em>.</p>
 +
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/34/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-3.png" />
 
 
<p>For the counted colonies the transformation efficiency is  
+
<figcaption>Fig. 3 Addition of lugol’s iodine to colonies grown
calculated with the following formula: </p>
+
on starch plates. There is only growth on the left plate 3,4
 +
and 9. On the right plate there is only growth on 1,7 and 9.
 +
The other colonies might died from a too heat inoculation loop.
 +
</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
  
<p><code>(# Colonies on plate/ng of DNA plated) X 1000 ng/µg =
+
<p>In addition, the colonies in the plates were counted. Plates
CFU/µg of DNA</code></p>
+
which contain a lot of colonies were divided in 16 areas as seen in
 +
figure 4. The area with the estimated average amount of colonies
 +
were counted. </p>
 +
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/86/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-4.jpg"
 +
style="heigth: 337px; width: 450px;"/>
  
<p>The amount ng of DNA plated, could be calculated with the following: </p>
+
<figcaption>Fig. 4 counting colonies after transformation. </figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
 +
<p>For the counted colonies the transformation efficiency is
 +
calculated with the following formula: </p>
  
<p><code>Volume of plasmid used in µL x concentration of DNA in
+
<p><code>(# Colonies on plate/ng of DNA plated) X 1000 ng/µg =
ng/µl x (volume plated / total reaction volume)</code></p>
+
CFU/µg of DNA</code></p>
+
<p>The first calculation is given as example: </p>
+
  
<p>400 µl of bacteria suspension is transformed with 3,6 µl
+
<p>The amount ng of DNA plated, could be calculated with the following: </p>
plasmid. This plasmid had a concentration of 276 ng/µl. The plated
+
volume is 50 µl. The mean of the amount of colonies overnight was
+
1882,7 cfu.  </p>
+
  
<p>The result of the calculation is: </p>
+
<p><code>Volume of plasmid used in µL x concentration of DNA in
 +
ng/µl x (volume plated / total reaction volume)</code></p>
 +
 +
<p>The first calculation is given as example: </p>
  
<p><code>(3,6 µl * 276) * (50 µl / 403,6 µl) ≈ 123 ng DNA
+
<p>400 µl of bacteria suspension is transformed with 3,6 µl  
plated</code></p>
+
plasmid. This plasmid had a concentration of 276 ng/µl. The plated  
+
volume is 50 µl. The mean of the amount of colonies overnight was
<p><code>(1882,7 colonies / 123 ng plated DNA) * 1000 ng/µg =
+
1882,7 cfu. </p>
1,5E+04 CFU/µg of DNA. </code></p>
+
  
<p>The results are summarised in the graphs below: </p>
+
<p>The result of the calculation is: </p>
  
<div class="split">
+
<p><code>(3,6 µl * 276) * (50 µl / 403,6 µl) ≈ 123 ng DNA
<figure class="left flone">
+
plated</code></p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/10/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-5.png" />
+
 +
<p><code>(1882,7 colonies / 123 ng plated DNA) * 1000 ng/µg =
 +
1,5E+04 CFU/µg of DNA. </code></p>
  
<figcaption>Fig. 5. Results of the transformation
+
<p>The results are summarised in the graphs below: </p>
efficiency. The mean amount of colonies has been used to
+
calculate the CFU/µg DNA. </figcaption>
+
</figure>
+
<figure class="right flone">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/67/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-6.png" />
+
  
<figcaption>Fig. 6 Results of the transformation  
+
<div class="split">
efficiency. The mean amount of colonies has been used to  
+
<figure class="left flone">
calculate the CFU/µg DNA.</figcaption>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/10/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-5.png" />
</figure>
+
 
</div>
+
<figcaption>Fig. 5. Results of the transformation  
+
efficiency. The mean amount of colonies has been used to  
<p>We can infer from the graphs that lower amount of DNA resulted  
+
calculate the CFU/µg DNA. </figcaption>
in higher colony forming units. The recommendation is not to use  
+
</figure>
1000 ng of DNA for transformation with <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>. Using 100 ng or  
+
<figure class="right flone">
10 ng DNA for transformation would be slightly better. </p>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/67/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-6.png" />
</section>
+
 
</article>
+
<figcaption>Fig. 6 Results of the transformation
 +
efficiency. The mean amount of colonies has been used to
 +
calculate the CFU/µg DNA.</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
<p>We can infer from the graphs that lower amount of DNA resulted  
 +
in higher colony forming units. The recommendation is not to use  
 +
1000 ng of DNA for transformation with <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>. Using 100 ng or  
 +
10 ng DNA for transformation would be slightly better. </p>
 +
</section>
 
</html>
 
</html>

Latest revision as of 21:05, 19 October 2016

Transformation Efficiency of B.subtilis plasmid backbone (BBa_K823023) created by iGEM LMU Munich 2012

The integration vector from team LMU Munich BacillusBiobrickbox 2012 (BBa_K823023) can be used to integrate an insert of interest in B. subtilis. The cloned insert will be integrated within the amyE locus in B. subtilis after transformation (see figure 1 for the integration locus). The amyE gene encodes for the alpha-amylase protein, which degrades starch. After transformation with BBa_K823023, the AmyE locus will be interrupted by the insert. The successful integration disrupts the ability of the bacteria to degrade starch.

Two strains of B. subtilis were chosen to test the transformation efficiency - B. subtilis 168 trp+ and B. subtilis 168 trp-. Each strain was transformed with three different concentrations of BBa_K823023; 1 µg/ml, 100 ng/ml, 10 ng/ml. This experiment was done in triplicate. The transformation was performed as indicated in Transformation of B. subtilis and colonies were selected on LB agar plates containing 5 μg/ml chloramphenicol. Subsequently 9 colonies were screened for correct integration of K823023 with the starch test Integration check: Starch test. They were grown on agar plates containing starch. The amylase activity of amyE is visible as a clear zone (halo) after addition of lugol’s iodine suggests the amyE gene was still intact and functional, which leads to the conclusion that the integration was unsuccessful. The colonies not forming the distinctive halo suggests a successful integration into amyE, disrupting its amylase activity which degrades starch.

Results

From the transformed bacteria suspension 50 µl were plated on LB agar plates with 5 µl/ml chloramphenicol. All the plates had colony formation, as seen in figure 1 and 2.

Fig. 1 Colonies after transformation of B. subtilis 168 trp+ with K823023. Concentration first row is 1 µg, second row is 100 ng, and third is 10 ng plasmid DNA.
Fig. 2 Colonies after transformation of B. subtilis 168 trp- with K823023. Concentration first row is 1 µg, second row is 100 ng, and third is 10 ng plasmid DNA.

After addition of lugol’s iodine, there were no clear zones around any B. subtilis colonies, see figure 3. This result demonstrated that the amyE locus in B. subtilis had been replaced successfully. Apart from this transformation efficiency experiment, our team has been using BBa_K823023 as a plasmid backbone for our message and key for integration in B. subtilis.

Fig. 3 Addition of lugol’s iodine to colonies grown on starch plates. There is only growth on the left plate 3,4 and 9. On the right plate there is only growth on 1,7 and 9. The other colonies might died from a too heat inoculation loop.

In addition, the colonies in the plates were counted. Plates which contain a lot of colonies were divided in 16 areas as seen in figure 4. The area with the estimated average amount of colonies were counted.

Fig. 4 counting colonies after transformation.

For the counted colonies the transformation efficiency is calculated with the following formula:

(# Colonies on plate/ng of DNA plated) X 1000 ng/µg = CFU/µg of DNA

The amount ng of DNA plated, could be calculated with the following:

Volume of plasmid used in µL x concentration of DNA in ng/µl x (volume plated / total reaction volume)

The first calculation is given as example:

400 µl of bacteria suspension is transformed with 3,6 µl plasmid. This plasmid had a concentration of 276 ng/µl. The plated volume is 50 µl. The mean of the amount of colonies overnight was 1882,7 cfu.

The result of the calculation is:

(3,6 µl * 276) * (50 µl / 403,6 µl) ≈ 123 ng DNA plated

(1882,7 colonies / 123 ng plated DNA) * 1000 ng/µg = 1,5E+04 CFU/µg of DNA.

The results are summarised in the graphs below:

Fig. 5. Results of the transformation efficiency. The mean amount of colonies has been used to calculate the CFU/µg DNA.
Fig. 6 Results of the transformation efficiency. The mean amount of colonies has been used to calculate the CFU/µg DNA.

We can infer from the graphs that lower amount of DNA resulted in higher colony forming units. The recommendation is not to use 1000 ng of DNA for transformation with BBa_K823023. Using 100 ng or 10 ng DNA for transformation would be slightly better.