IlonaMager (Talk | contribs) |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
− | < | + | <section> |
− | < | + | <h3>Transformation Efficiency of <em>B.subtilis</em> plasmid backbone |
− | + | (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>) created by iGEM LMU Munich 2012 </h3> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | <p>The integration vector from team LMU Munich BacillusBiobrickbox | |
− | + | 2012 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>) can be used to integrate an insert of interest | |
− | + | in <em>B. subtilis</em>. The cloned insert will be integrated within the | |
− | + | amyE locus in <em>B. subtilis</em> after transformation (see figure 1 for | |
− | + | the integration locus). The amyE gene encodes for the alpha-amylase | |
− | + | protein, which degrades starch. After transformation with | |
− | + | <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>, the AmyE locus will be interrupted by the insert. The | |
− | + | successful integration disrupts the ability of the bacteria to | |
− | + | degrade starch. </p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | <p>Two strains of <em>B. subtilis</em> were chosen to test the | |
− | + | transformation efficiency - <em>B. subtilis</em> 168 trp+ and <em>B. subtilis</em> | |
− | + | 168 trp-. Each strain was transformed with three different | |
− | + | concentrations of <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>; 1 µg/ml, 100 ng/ml, 10 ng/ml. This | |
− | + | experiment was done in triplicate. The transformation was | |
− | + | performed as indicated in <a href="/Team:Groningen/Protocols#transform-b-subtilis">Transformation of B. subtilis</a> and colonies | |
− | + | were selected on LB agar plates containing 5 μg/ml chloramphenicol. | |
− | + | Subsequently 9 colonies were screened for correct integration of | |
− | + | K823023 with the starch test <a href="/Team:Groningen/Protocols#Starch-test">Integration check: Starch test</a>. They were grown on | |
− | + | agar plates containing starch. The amylase activity of amyE is | |
− | + | visible as a clear zone (halo) after addition of lugol’s iodine | |
− | + | suggests the amyE gene was still intact and functional, which leads | |
− | + | to the conclusion that the integration was unsuccessful. The | |
− | + | colonies not forming the distinctive halo suggests a successful | |
− | + | integration into amyE, disrupting its amylase activity which | |
− | + | degrades starch.</p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | <h4>Results</h4> | |
− | < | + | |
− | + | <p>From the transformed bacteria suspension 50 µl were plated on LB | |
− | + | agar plates with 5 µl/ml chloramphenicol. All the plates had colony | |
− | + | formation, as seen in figure 1 and 2. </p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | <div class="split"> | |
− | + | <figure class="left flone"> | |
− | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/00/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-1.jpg" /> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | <figcaption>Fig. | + | <figcaption>Fig. 1 Colonies after transformation of <em>B. |
− | + | subtilis</em> 168 trp+ with K823023. Concentration first row is | |
− | + | 1 µg, second row is 100 ng, and third is 10 ng plasmid DNA. | |
− | + | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
+ | <figure class="right flone"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/50/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-2.jpg" /> | ||
− | + | <figcaption>Fig. 2 Colonies after transformation of <em>B. | |
− | + | subtilis</em> 168 trp- with K823023. Concentration first row is | |
− | + | 1 µg, second row is 100 ng, and third is 10 ng plasmid | |
− | + | DNA.</figcaption> | |
− | + | </figure> | |
− | <figure> | + | </div> |
− | + | ||
− | + | <p>After addition of lugol’s iodine, there were no clear zones | |
− | + | around any <em>B. subtilis</em> colonies, see figure 3. This result | |
+ | demonstrated that the amyE locus in <em>B. subtilis</em> had been replaced | ||
+ | successfully. Apart from this transformation efficiency experiment, | ||
+ | our team has been using <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a> as a plasmid backbone for our | ||
+ | message and key for integration in <em>B. subtilis</em>.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <figure> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/34/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-3.png" /> | ||
− | < | + | <figcaption>Fig. 3 Addition of lugol’s iodine to colonies grown |
− | + | on starch plates. There is only growth on the left plate 3,4 | |
+ | and 9. On the right plate there is only growth on 1,7 and 9. | ||
+ | The other colonies might died from a too heat inoculation loop. | ||
+ | </figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
− | + | <p>In addition, the colonies in the plates were counted. Plates | |
− | + | which contain a lot of colonies were divided in 16 areas as seen in | |
+ | figure 4. The area with the estimated average amount of colonies | ||
+ | were counted. </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <figure> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/86/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-4.jpg" | ||
+ | style="heigth: 337px; width: 450px;"/> | ||
− | <p> | + | <figcaption>Fig. 4 counting colonies after transformation. </figcaption> |
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>For the counted colonies the transformation efficiency is | ||
+ | calculated with the following formula: </p> | ||
− | + | <p><code>(# Colonies on plate/ng of DNA plated) X 1000 ng/µg = | |
− | + | CFU/µg of DNA</code></p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | <p>The amount ng of DNA plated, could be calculated with the following: </p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | <p><code>Volume of plasmid used in µL x concentration of DNA in | |
+ | ng/µl x (volume plated / total reaction volume)</code></p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>The first calculation is given as example: </p> | ||
− | + | <p>400 µl of bacteria suspension is transformed with 3,6 µl | |
− | + | plasmid. This plasmid had a concentration of 276 ng/µl. The plated | |
− | + | volume is 50 µl. The mean of the amount of colonies overnight was | |
− | + | 1882,7 cfu. </p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | <p>The result of the calculation is: </p> | |
− | + | <p><code>(3,6 µl * 276) * (50 µl / 403,6 µl) ≈ 123 ng DNA | |
− | + | plated</code></p> | |
− | + | ||
+ | <p><code>(1882,7 colonies / 123 ng plated DNA) * 1000 ng/µg = | ||
+ | 1,5E+04 CFU/µg of DNA. </code></p> | ||
− | + | <p>The results are summarised in the graphs below: </p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | <div class="split"> | |
− | + | <figure class="left flone"> | |
− | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/10/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-5.png" /> | |
− | + | ||
− | </ | + | <figcaption>Fig. 5. Results of the transformation |
− | + | efficiency. The mean amount of colonies has been used to | |
− | <p>We can infer from the graphs that lower amount of DNA resulted | + | calculate the CFU/µg DNA. </figcaption> |
− | + | </figure> | |
− | + | <figure class="right flone"> | |
− | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/67/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-6.png" /> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | <figcaption>Fig. 6 Results of the transformation | |
+ | efficiency. The mean amount of colonies has been used to | ||
+ | calculate the CFU/µg DNA.</figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>We can infer from the graphs that lower amount of DNA resulted | ||
+ | in higher colony forming units. The recommendation is not to use | ||
+ | 1000 ng of DNA for transformation with <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>. Using 100 ng or | ||
+ | 10 ng DNA for transformation would be slightly better. </p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
</html> | </html> |
Latest revision as of 21:05, 19 October 2016
The integration vector from team LMU Munich BacillusBiobrickbox
2012 (BBa_K823023) can be used to integrate an insert of interest
in B. subtilis. The cloned insert will be integrated within the
amyE locus in B. subtilis after transformation (see figure 1 for
the integration locus). The amyE gene encodes for the alpha-amylase
protein, which degrades starch. After transformation with
BBa_K823023, the AmyE locus will be interrupted by the insert. The
successful integration disrupts the ability of the bacteria to
degrade starch. Two strains of B. subtilis were chosen to test the
transformation efficiency - B. subtilis 168 trp+ and B. subtilis
168 trp-. Each strain was transformed with three different
concentrations of BBa_K823023; 1 µg/ml, 100 ng/ml, 10 ng/ml. This
experiment was done in triplicate. The transformation was
performed as indicated in Transformation of B. subtilis and colonies
were selected on LB agar plates containing 5 μg/ml chloramphenicol.
Subsequently 9 colonies were screened for correct integration of
K823023 with the starch test Integration check: Starch test. They were grown on
agar plates containing starch. The amylase activity of amyE is
visible as a clear zone (halo) after addition of lugol’s iodine
suggests the amyE gene was still intact and functional, which leads
to the conclusion that the integration was unsuccessful. The
colonies not forming the distinctive halo suggests a successful
integration into amyE, disrupting its amylase activity which
degrades starch. From the transformed bacteria suspension 50 µl were plated on LB
agar plates with 5 µl/ml chloramphenicol. All the plates had colony
formation, as seen in figure 1 and 2. After addition of lugol’s iodine, there were no clear zones
around any B. subtilis colonies, see figure 3. This result
demonstrated that the amyE locus in B. subtilis had been replaced
successfully. Apart from this transformation efficiency experiment,
our team has been using BBa_K823023 as a plasmid backbone for our
message and key for integration in B. subtilis. In addition, the colonies in the plates were counted. Plates
which contain a lot of colonies were divided in 16 areas as seen in
figure 4. The area with the estimated average amount of colonies
were counted. For the counted colonies the transformation efficiency is
calculated with the following formula: The amount ng of DNA plated, could be calculated with the following: The first calculation is given as example: 400 µl of bacteria suspension is transformed with 3,6 µl
plasmid. This plasmid had a concentration of 276 ng/µl. The plated
volume is 50 µl. The mean of the amount of colonies overnight was
1882,7 cfu. The result of the calculation is: The results are summarised in the graphs below: We can infer from the graphs that lower amount of DNA resulted
in higher colony forming units. The recommendation is not to use
1000 ng of DNA for transformation with BBa_K823023. Using 100 ng or
10 ng DNA for transformation would be slightly better. Transformation Efficiency of B.subtilis plasmid backbone
(BBa_K823023) created by iGEM LMU Munich 2012
Results
(# Colonies on plate/ng of DNA plated) X 1000 ng/µg =
CFU/µg of DNA
Volume of plasmid used in µL x concentration of DNA in
ng/µl x (volume plated / total reaction volume)
(3,6 µl * 276) * (50 µl / 403,6 µl) ≈ 123 ng DNA
plated
(1882,7 colonies / 123 ng plated DNA) * 1000 ng/µg =
1,5E+04 CFU/µg of DNA.