(47 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 171: | Line 171: | ||
<a href="#Peshawar" aria-controls="Peshawar" role="tab" data-toggle="tab"> | <a href="#Peshawar" aria-controls="Peshawar" role="tab" data-toggle="tab"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/db/T--Technion_Israel--icon_intro.png" class="img-responsive img-center cir_tabs" width="75" height="75"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/db/T--Technion_Israel--icon_intro.png" class="img-responsive img-center cir_tabs" width="75" height="75"> | ||
− | <br><h4 class="text-center" | + | <br><h4 class="text-center">Introduction</h4> |
</a> | </a> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
<a href="#Aachen" aria-controls="Aachen" role="tab" data-toggle="tab"> | <a href="#Aachen" aria-controls="Aachen" role="tab" data-toggle="tab"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/49/T--Technion_Israel--icon_lab.png" class="img-responsive img-center cir_tabs" width="75" height="75"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/49/T--Technion_Israel--icon_lab.png" class="img-responsive img-center cir_tabs" width="75" height="75"> | ||
− | <br><h4 class="text-center" | + | <br><h4 class="text-center">Design</h4> |
</a> | </a> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
<a href="#Results" aria-controls="Results" role="tab" data-toggle="tab"> | <a href="#Results" aria-controls="Results" role="tab" data-toggle="tab"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/45/T--Technion_Israel--icon_results.png" class="img-responsive img-center cir_tabs" width="75" height="75"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/45/T--Technion_Israel--icon_results.png" class="img-responsive img-center cir_tabs" width="75" height="75"> | ||
− | <br><h4 class="text-center" | + | <br><h4 class="text-center">Results</h4> |
</a> | </a> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
Line 192: | Line 192: | ||
<a href="#outlook" aria-controls="outlook" role="tab" data-toggle="tab"> | <a href="#outlook" aria-controls="outlook" role="tab" data-toggle="tab"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/47/T--Technion_Israel--icon_outlook.png" class="img-responsive img-center cir_tabs" width="75" height="75"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/47/T--Technion_Israel--icon_outlook.png" class="img-responsive img-center cir_tabs" width="75" height="75"> | ||
− | <br><h4 class="text-center"> | + | <br><h4 class="text-center">Conclusion</h4> |
</a> | </a> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
Line 219: | Line 219: | ||
<h2 class="">Introduction</h2> | <h2 class="">Introduction</h2> | ||
<p class="text-justify"> | <p class="text-justify"> | ||
− | FlashLab | + | FlashLab is a novel detection tool based on the <a data-toggle="popover" data-trigger="click" data-original-title="Info:" data-html="true" data-content="biological system that controls the bacterial motion and induces movement away from a chemo-repellent or towards a chemo-attractant">chemotaxis system<i class="entypo-check"></i></button></a> of <I>E. coli</I> bacteria. It utilizes chemotaxis to concentrate bacteria expressing a chromo-protein, this in turn, creates a visible gradient in color – detection of a target material. |
− | + | FlashLab is an application of the S.Tar project. S.Tar is a platform for programmable chemotaxis that allows the user to select the material that will induce a bacterial chemotactic response. For more information please visit <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Technion_Israel/S.Tar_intro">S.Tar page</a>. | |
− | . It utilizes chemotaxis to concentrate bacteria expressing a chromo-protein, this in turn, creates a visible gradient in color – detection of a target material. | + | |
− | FlashLab is an application of the S.Tar project. S.Tar is a platform for programmable chemotaxis | + | |
Using S.Tar technology, FlashLab can detect a variety of materials: hormones, amino acids, organic compounds etc. | Using S.Tar technology, FlashLab can detect a variety of materials: hormones, amino acids, organic compounds etc. | ||
Line 231: | Line 229: | ||
<div class="col-md-12"> | <div class="col-md-12"> | ||
<a class="pop"> | <a class="pop"> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/thumb/9/95/T--Technion_Israel--FlashLab.png/800px-T--Technion_Israel--FlashLab.png" class="img-responsive img-center img-cont" style="cursor: pointer;"><br> |
</a> | </a> | ||
− | <p class="text-center"><b>Fig. 1:</b> A | + | <p class="text-center"><b>Fig. 1:</b> A scheme of the FlashLab concept, add bacteria expressing the chemoreceptor of your choice and a chromo protein, to a fluidic chip. Add the sample in question to the chip. If the sample contains the substance that is recognized by the chemoreceptor, a displacement of the bacteria will become visible. If not, then no displacement will be seen.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 268: | Line 266: | ||
<h3>FlashLab parts</h3> | <h3>FlashLab parts</h3> | ||
<p class="text-justify"> | <p class="text-justify"> | ||
− | The device is composed of a <a href="http://ibidi.com/xtproducts/en/ibidi-Labware/sticky-Slides/sticky-Slide-I-Luer">commercial fluidic chip</a>: | + | The device is composed of a <a href="http://ibidi.com/xtproducts/en/ibidi-Labware/sticky-Slides/sticky-Slide-I-Luer"target="_blank">commercial fluidic chip</a>: |
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 281: | Line 279: | ||
<div class="col-sm-12"> | <div class="col-sm-12"> | ||
<p class="text-justify"> | <p class="text-justify"> | ||
− | The chip is open on the | + | The chip is open on the bottom part and closed with a standard microscope cover glass (0.3 [mm] thick). |
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 291: | Line 289: | ||
<h3>FlashLab setup</h3> | <h3>FlashLab setup</h3> | ||
<p class="text-justify"> | <p class="text-justify"> | ||
− | The setup of the device is composed of two parts, as shown below (Figure | + | The setup of the device is composed of two parts, as shown below (Figure 2):<br> |
− | <b>a. </b>The channel is filled with colored E. coli bacteria suspended in motility buffer. | + | |
− | <b>b. </b>The sample is loaded into one of the entry slots. | + | <b>a. </b>The channel is filled with colored <i>E. coli</i> bacteria suspended in motility buffer.<br> |
+ | <b>b. </b>The sample is loaded into one of the entry slots. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 306: | Line 305: | ||
<div class="col-sm-12"> | <div class="col-sm-12"> | ||
− | <h3>FlashLab | + | <h3>FlashLab assay</h3> |
<p class="text-justify"> | <p class="text-justify"> | ||
Once the sample is loaded, it diffuses into the channel. If the sample contains a repellent, the bacteria | Once the sample is loaded, it diffuses into the channel. If the sample contains a repellent, the bacteria | ||
− | will react and | + | will react and flee from it as shown below: |
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 322: | Line 321: | ||
<div class="col-sm-12"> | <div class="col-sm-12"> | ||
<p class="text-justify"> | <p class="text-justify"> | ||
− | The chemotactic response will result in visible changes in the bacterial concentration throughout the chip: Very low concentration in the immediate area of the slot in which the sample was loaded, adjacent to a higher concentration of bacteria created due to the fleeing bacterial population | + | The chemotactic response will result in visible changes in the bacterial concentration throughout the chip: Very low concentration in the immediate area of the slot in which the sample was loaded, adjacent to a higher concentration of bacteria created due to the fleeing bacterial population. These changes will be visible to the naked eye, as the higher concentration of colored bacteria results in darker color (blue gradient, figures 2 and 3). |
If the sample does not contain the target material, the bacteria will not react and no gradient will be formed. | If the sample does not contain the target material, the bacteria will not react and no gradient will be formed. | ||
− | <br> | + | <br><br> |
For more information see <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Technion_Israel/Model">mathematical model</a>. | For more information see <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Technion_Israel/Model">mathematical model</a>. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 360: | Line 359: | ||
<h3>FlashLab parts</h3> | <h3>FlashLab parts</h3> | ||
<p class="text-justify"> | <p class="text-justify"> | ||
− | The setup | + | The setup of the device is as shown in the "Design" Tab. The bacteria, UU1250 <I>E.coli</I> strain with a cloned Tar-PctA receptor , was picked from a petri dish and suspended in motility buffer. The Chemo-repellent used was TCE (trichloroethylene) in concentration of 0.02 [M] while the control was motility buffer. The images were taken in a different times. |
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <!-- 12 img div --> | ||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | <div class="col-sm-8 col-sm-offset-2"><!-- 8/12 --> | ||
+ | <div class="col-md-6 col-sm-12"> | ||
+ | <p class="text-justify">a.</p> | ||
+ | <a class="pop"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/c/ca/T--Technion_Israel--Model2.png" class="img-responsive img-center img-cont" width="290" style="cursor: pointer;"><br> | ||
+ | </a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="col-md-6 col-sm-12"> | ||
+ | <p class="text-justify">b.</p> | ||
+ | <a class="pop"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/76/T--Technion_Israel--ModelControl.png" class="img-responsive img-center img-cont" width="220" style="cursor: pointer;"><br> | ||
+ | </a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="col-md-12 col-sm-12"> | ||
+ | <p class="text-center"><b>Fig. 1:</b> | ||
+ | <b>a.</b> Chemotaxis of <i>E. coli</i> with a S.Tar PctA receptor due to exposure to TCE (enhanced picture). | ||
+ | <b>b.</b> <i>E. coli</i> with a S.Tar PctA receptor exposed to motility buffer (control). | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="col-sm-12"> | <div class="col-sm-12"> | ||
<p class="text-justify"> | <p class="text-justify"> | ||
− | After | + | After 15[min] , a noticeable color gradient is formed in the channel. In 120 [min] a relatively light shade can be seen near the entry point. Adjacent to it, an area with a darker tone and from there up to the end of the channel, the color did not change at all. This fits the theory perfectly, as the lighter shade is caused by colored bacteria moving away from the repellent. The darker shade is the clustering of bacteria in the chemo-repellent diffusion limit. All other bacteria in the channel, were not exposed to the repellent and did not react accordingly. |
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | + | For more information see chip <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/11/T--Technion_Israel--Protocol_-_Chemotaxis_on_chip_test.pdf"target="_blank">experiment protocol</a>. | |
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | + | </div> | |
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 404: | Line 422: | ||
<div class="col-sm-12"> | <div class="col-sm-12"> | ||
− | <h2 class=""> | + | <h2 class="">Conclusion</h2> |
<p class="text-justify"> | <p class="text-justify"> | ||
− | We developed FlashLab, the hardware of the S. Tar platform. S. Tar | + | We developed FlashLab, the hardware of the S.Tar platform. S.Tar has the potential to offer a wide library of “expert” strains for the detection of materials that do not naturally induce chemotactic movement in the native <i>E. coli</i>. This was obtained using synthetic biology tools, including computational design which allowed us to create new mutations in the Tar chemoreceptor. |
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | FlashLab is a tool which combines both biological and mechanical aspects. As we mentioned before, computational tools were required as well in order to develop the S. Tar platform. This multidisciplinary innovation was achieved thanks to the different backgrounds of our team members. Our team is comprised of students from the | + | FlashLab is a tool which combines both biological and mechanical aspects. As we mentioned before, computational tools were required as well in order to develop the S.Tar platform. This multidisciplinary innovation was achieved thanks to the different backgrounds of our team members. Our team is comprised of students from the faculty of Biotechnology that oversaw the Tar chemoreceptor modification in the wet lab, students from the faculties of Mechanical engineering and Chemical engineering that developed the mathematical model for the flow and chemotaxis profiles inside the microchannel and students from the faculties of Electrical engineering and Computer Science that were in charge of the computational design aspects of the project. The unique composition of our team was crucial to the construction of a complex but elegant system. |
<br> | <br> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
</p> | </p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="col-sm-12"> | ||
+ | <h2 class="">Advantages</h2> | ||
+ | <p class="text-justify"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | There are several methods for detection of small molecules. The following table summarizes the most common methods in the field: | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<table class="table table-list-search"> | <table class="table table-list-search"> | ||
Line 429: | Line 464: | ||
<tbody> | <tbody> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Reporter genes <b>(2)</b></td> | ||
+ | <td>Fusion of a reporter gene to a biological biobrick which is regulated by a material of interest. </td> | ||
+ | <td>Requires gene expression and translation.<br>The material of interest must penetrate the bacterial membrane. </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | <td>Chromogenic assay <b>( | + | <td>Chromogenic assay <b>(3)</b></td> |
− | <td>A chemical reaction which results in the change of absorbance of a certain molecule | + | <td>A chemical reaction which results in the change of absorbance of a certain molecule when it interacts with the analyte.</td> |
− | <td>Specific for | + | <td>Specific for very limited range of molecules.<br>Expensive.</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | <td>ELISA- Immunofluorescence assay <b>( | + | <td>ELISA- Immunofluorescence assay <b>(4)</b></td> |
<td>A specific interaction between an antibody and its antigen is coupled to an enzymatic fluorescent reaction.</td> | <td>A specific interaction between an antibody and its antigen is coupled to an enzymatic fluorescent reaction.</td> | ||
− | <td>Specific antibodies are required | + | <td>Specific antibodies are required.<br>Expensive.<br>Requires dedicated equipment.</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | <td>HPLC <b>( | + | <td>HPLC <b>(5)</b></td> |
<td>Chromatographic separation based on polarity.</td> | <td>Chromatographic separation based on polarity.</td> | ||
− | <td>Requires | + | <td>Requires dedicated equipment and expertise.<br>Expensive</td> |
</tbody> | </tbody> | ||
Line 455: | Line 496: | ||
<p class="text-justify"> | <p class="text-justify"> | ||
FlashLab advantages as a detection tool: | FlashLab advantages as a detection tool: | ||
− | <br>- <b>Cost effective</b> The only major cost is the fluidic chip which costs about 15$ and can be reused multiple times. | + | <br>- <b>Cost effective</b>: The only major cost is the fluidic chip which costs about 15$ and can be reused multiple times. |
− | <br>- <b>Fast</b> as shown in the experiments, the detection takes about 30 minutes. This is faster than most other bacterial detection | + | <br>- <b>Fast</b>: as shown in the experiments, the detection takes about 30 minutes. This is faster than most other bacterial based detection that depends on transcription and translation. |
− | <br>- <b>Versatile</b> The S.Tar system enables this device to detect a variety of materials: hormones, amino acids, organic compounds etc | + | <br>- <b>Versatile</b>: The S.Tar system enables this device to detect a variety of materials: hormones, amino acids, organic compounds etc. |
− | + | <br>- <b>User friendly</b>: The setup of the system is an easy two part process.<br> | |
− | <br>- <b>User friendly</b> The setup of the system is an easy two part process. | + | FlashLab, offers a fast, cheap, easy to use and versatile detection.<br> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 498: | Line 537: | ||
<p class="references"> | <p class="references"> | ||
References:<br> | References:<br> | ||
− | 1. | + | 1. MAZZAG, B. C.; ZHULIN, I. B.; MOGILNER, Alexander. Model of bacterial band formation in aerotaxis. Biophysical journal, 2003, 85.6: 3558-3574.<br><br> |
+ | 2. Naylor, Louise H. "Reporter gene technology: the future looks bright."Biochemical pharmacology 58.5 (1999): 749-757.<br> | ||
+ | 3. Santos-Figueroa, Luis E., et al. "Chromogenic and fluorogenic chemosensors and reagents for anions. A comprehensive review of the years 2010–2011." Chemical Society Reviews 42.8 (2013): 3489-3613.<br><br> | ||
+ | 4. Blake, Christopher, and Barry J. Gould. "Use of enzymes in immunoassay techniques. A review." Analyst 109.5 (1984): 533-547.<br><br> | ||
+ | 5. Kucharska, Marta, and Jan Grabka. "A review of chromatographic methods for determination of synthetic food dyes." Talanta 80.3 (2010): 1045-1051.<br><br> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:24, 19 October 2016
Introduction
FlashLab is a novel detection tool based on the chemotaxis system of E. coli bacteria. It utilizes chemotaxis to concentrate bacteria expressing a chromo-protein, this in turn, creates a visible gradient in color – detection of a target material.
FlashLab is an application of the S.Tar project. S.Tar is a platform for programmable chemotaxis that allows the user to select the material that will induce a bacterial chemotactic response. For more information please visit S.Tar page.
Using S.Tar technology, FlashLab can detect a variety of materials: hormones, amino acids, organic compounds etc.
Fig. 1: A scheme of the FlashLab concept, add bacteria expressing the chemoreceptor of your choice and a chromo protein, to a fluidic chip. Add the sample in question to the chip. If the sample contains the substance that is recognized by the chemoreceptor, a displacement of the bacteria will become visible. If not, then no displacement will be seen.
The chip is open on the bottom part and closed with a standard microscope cover glass (0.3 [mm] thick).
FlashLab setup
The setup of the device is composed of two parts, as shown below (Figure 2):
a. The channel is filled with colored E. coli bacteria suspended in motility buffer.
b. The sample is loaded into one of the entry slots.
FlashLab assay
Once the sample is loaded, it diffuses into the channel. If the sample contains a repellent, the bacteria will react and flee from it as shown below:
The chemotactic response will result in visible changes in the bacterial concentration throughout the chip: Very low concentration in the immediate area of the slot in which the sample was loaded, adjacent to a higher concentration of bacteria created due to the fleeing bacterial population. These changes will be visible to the naked eye, as the higher concentration of colored bacteria results in darker color (blue gradient, figures 2 and 3).
If the sample does not contain the target material, the bacteria will not react and no gradient will be formed.
For more information see mathematical model.
Results
FlashLab parts
The setup of the device is as shown in the "Design" Tab. The bacteria, UU1250 E.coli strain with a cloned Tar-PctA receptor , was picked from a petri dish and suspended in motility buffer. The Chemo-repellent used was TCE (trichloroethylene) in concentration of 0.02 [M] while the control was motility buffer. The images were taken in a different times.
After 15[min] , a noticeable color gradient is formed in the channel. In 120 [min] a relatively light shade can be seen near the entry point. Adjacent to it, an area with a darker tone and from there up to the end of the channel, the color did not change at all. This fits the theory perfectly, as the lighter shade is caused by colored bacteria moving away from the repellent. The darker shade is the clustering of bacteria in the chemo-repellent diffusion limit. All other bacteria in the channel, were not exposed to the repellent and did not react accordingly.
For more information see chip experiment protocol.
Conclusion
We developed FlashLab, the hardware of the S.Tar platform. S.Tar has the potential to offer a wide library of “expert” strains for the detection of materials that do not naturally induce chemotactic movement in the native E. coli. This was obtained using synthetic biology tools, including computational design which allowed us to create new mutations in the Tar chemoreceptor.
FlashLab is a tool which combines both biological and mechanical aspects. As we mentioned before, computational tools were required as well in order to develop the S.Tar platform. This multidisciplinary innovation was achieved thanks to the different backgrounds of our team members. Our team is comprised of students from the faculty of Biotechnology that oversaw the Tar chemoreceptor modification in the wet lab, students from the faculties of Mechanical engineering and Chemical engineering that developed the mathematical model for the flow and chemotaxis profiles inside the microchannel and students from the faculties of Electrical engineering and Computer Science that were in charge of the computational design aspects of the project. The unique composition of our team was crucial to the construction of a complex but elegant system.
Advantages
There are several methods for detection of small molecules. The following table summarizes the most common methods in the field:
Method | Description | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Reporter genes (2) | Fusion of a reporter gene to a biological biobrick which is regulated by a material of interest. | Requires gene expression and translation. The material of interest must penetrate the bacterial membrane. |
Chromogenic assay (3) | A chemical reaction which results in the change of absorbance of a certain molecule when it interacts with the analyte. | Specific for very limited range of molecules. Expensive. |
ELISA- Immunofluorescence assay (4) | A specific interaction between an antibody and its antigen is coupled to an enzymatic fluorescent reaction. | Specific antibodies are required. Expensive. Requires dedicated equipment. |
HPLC (5) | Chromatographic separation based on polarity. | Requires dedicated equipment and expertise. Expensive |
FlashLab advantages as a detection tool:
- Cost effective: The only major cost is the fluidic chip which costs about 15$ and can be reused multiple times.
- Fast: as shown in the experiments, the detection takes about 30 minutes. This is faster than most other bacterial based detection that depends on transcription and translation.
- Versatile: The S.Tar system enables this device to detect a variety of materials: hormones, amino acids, organic compounds etc.
- User friendly: The setup of the system is an easy two part process.
FlashLab, offers a fast, cheap, easy to use and versatile detection.
References:
1. MAZZAG, B. C.; ZHULIN, I. B.; MOGILNER, Alexander. Model of bacterial band formation in aerotaxis. Biophysical journal, 2003, 85.6: 3558-3574.
2. Naylor, Louise H. "Reporter gene technology: the future looks bright."Biochemical pharmacology 58.5 (1999): 749-757.
3. Santos-Figueroa, Luis E., et al. "Chromogenic and fluorogenic chemosensors and reagents for anions. A comprehensive review of the years 2010–2011." Chemical Society Reviews 42.8 (2013): 3489-3613.
4. Blake, Christopher, and Barry J. Gould. "Use of enzymes in immunoassay techniques. A review." Analyst 109.5 (1984): 533-547.
5. Kucharska, Marta, and Jan Grabka. "A review of chromatographic methods for determination of synthetic food dyes." Talanta 80.3 (2010): 1045-1051.