Difference between revisions of "Team:Saint Rose School A/Results"

 
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 38: Line 38:
 
     font-size: 30px;
 
     font-size: 30px;
 
     margin-bottom: 60px;
 
     margin-bottom: 60px;
−
     font-weight: 400;  
+
    margin-top: 60px;
−
"><strong>July 8rd:<strong> our samples failed to be clear.
+
     font-weight: 200;  
 +
"><strong>July 8th:</strong> our samples failed to be clear.
 
</h2>
 
</h2>
  
Line 45: Line 46:
 
<p style="text-align:center">
 
<p style="text-align:center">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/5a/Result1igem.jpg">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/5a/Result1igem.jpg">
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<h2 style="
 +
    color: black;
 +
    text-align: center;
 +
    padding: 2%;
 +
    font-size: 30px;
 +
    margin-bottom: 60px;
 +
    margin-top: 60px;
 +
    font-weight: 200;
 +
"><strong> July 22nd:</strong> Too heated, without result.
 +
</h2>
 +
 +
<p style="text-align:center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/9b/Result2igem.jpg">
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<h2 style="
 +
    color: black;
 +
    text-align: center;
 +
    padding: 2%;
 +
    font-size: 30px;
 +
    margin-bottom: 60px;
 +
    margin-top: 60px;
 +
    font-weight: 200;
 +
"><strong> July 22nd:</strong> the sample was too heated again, and we did not abtained any result.
 +
</h2>
 +
 +
<p style="text-align:center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/e/e9/Result3igem.jpg">
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<h2 style="
 +
    color: black;
 +
    text-align: center;
 +
    padding: 2%;
 +
    font-size: 30px;
 +
    margin-bottom: 60px;
 +
    margin-top: 60px;
 +
    font-weight: 200;
 +
"><strong> July 23rd:</strong> performed in a small chamber gel 1.5, with Plux promoter, we weren´t able to see the two bands as espected..
 +
</h2>
 +
 +
<p style="text-align:center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/1d/Result4igem.jpg">
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<h2 style="
 +
    color: black;
 +
    text-align: center;
 +
    padding: 2%;
 +
    font-size: 30px;
 +
    margin-bottom: 60px;
 +
    margin-top: 60px;
 +
    font-weight: 200;
 +
"><strong> July 30th:</strong> No result was obtained from all samples, it will be repeated.
 +
</h2>
 +
 +
<p style="text-align:center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/1e/Result5igem.jpg">
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<h2 style="
 +
    color: black;
 +
    text-align: center;
 +
    padding: 2%;
 +
    font-size: 30px;
 +
    margin-bottom: 60px;
 +
    margin-top: 60px;
 +
    font-weight: 200;
 +
"><strong> August 5th:</strong> the expected samples could be clearly seen, the third tends to have two bands.
 +
</h2>
 +
 +
<p style="text-align:center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d6/Result6igem.jpg">
 +
</p>
 +
 +
 +
<h2 style="
 +
    color: black;
 +
    text-align: center;
 +
    padding: 2%;
 +
    font-size: 30px;
 +
    margin-bottom: 60px;
 +
    margin-top: 60px;
 +
    font-weight: 200;
 +
"><strong> August 10th:</strong> plasmids concentrates, all the samples were completely able to be seen, getting the expected result.
 +
</h2>
 +
 +
<p style="text-align:center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/1e/Result7igem.jpg">
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<h2 style="
 +
    color: black;
 +
    text-align: center;
 +
    padding: 2%;
 +
    font-size: 30px;
 +
    margin-bottom: 60px;
 +
    margin-top: 60px;
 +
    font-weight: 200;
 +
"><strong> August 12th: </strong>we turned to repeat samples to make sure everything is correct, then the plasmids were sent to cryogenics.
 +
</h2>
 +
 +
<p style="text-align:center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/cf/Result8igem.jpg">
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
Line 50: Line 157:
  
  
 +
<br><br>
  
  
Line 118: Line 226:
 
section#grupo {
 
section#grupo {
  
−
background-image: url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/03/Grupob.jpg");
+
background-image: url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/cd/Bannerallll.jpg");
−
height: 17em;
+
height: 20em;
 
background-size: 100%;
 
background-size: 100%;
 
background-repeat: no-repeat;
 
background-repeat: no-repeat;
Line 125: Line 233:
 
}
 
}
  
 +
.content_wrapper p {
 +
    padding: 0px 0px;
 +
    font-size: 0px;
 +
    margin: 0 0 0px;
 +
}
  
  

Latest revision as of 01:14, 20 October 2016


Results

After carrying out laboratory work, the way we used to check if our work was successful was through electrophoresis using agarose gel 0.8; 1.2 and 1.5 depending on its need. 
Our laboratory work began in June this year and since then, we have been working. Now, we will see our performance in Lux:

July 8th: our samples failed to be clear.

July 22nd: Too heated, without result.

July 22nd: the sample was too heated again, and we did not abtained any result.

July 23rd: performed in a small chamber gel 1.5, with Plux promoter, we weren´t able to see the two bands as espected..

July 30th: No result was obtained from all samples, it will be repeated.

August 5th: the expected samples could be clearly seen, the third tends to have two bands.

August 10th: plasmids concentrates, all the samples were completely able to be seen, getting the expected result.

August 12th: we turned to repeat samples to make sure everything is correct, then the plasmids were sent to cryogenics.