Difference between revisions of "Team:Saint Rose School A/Results"
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
margin-top: 60px; | margin-top: 60px; | ||
font-weight: 200; | font-weight: 200; | ||
| − | "><strong>July | + | "><strong>July 8th:</strong> our samples failed to be clear. |
</h2> | </h2> | ||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
margin-top: 60px; | margin-top: 60px; | ||
font-weight: 200; | font-weight: 200; | ||
| − | "><strong> July | + | "><strong> July 22nd:</strong> the sample was too heated again, and we did not abtained any result. |
</h2> | </h2> | ||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
margin-top: 60px; | margin-top: 60px; | ||
font-weight: 200; | font-weight: 200; | ||
| − | "><strong> July 23rd:</strong> performed in a small chamber gel 1.5, with Plux promoter, | + | "><strong> July 23rd:</strong> performed in a small chamber gel 1.5, with Plux promoter, we weren´t able to see the two bands as espected.. |
</h2> | </h2> | ||
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
margin-top: 60px; | margin-top: 60px; | ||
font-weight: 200; | font-weight: 200; | ||
| − | "><strong> August 5th:</strong> the expected samples could be clearly seen, the third | + | "><strong> August 5th:</strong> the expected samples could be clearly seen, the third tends to have two bands. |
</h2> | </h2> | ||
| Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
| − | + | <br><br> | |
| Line 226: | Line 226: | ||
section#grupo { | section#grupo { | ||
| − | background-image: url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/ | + | background-image: url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/cd/Bannerallll.jpg"); |
| − | height: | + | height: 20em; |
background-size: 100%; | background-size: 100%; | ||
background-repeat: no-repeat; | background-repeat: no-repeat; | ||
| Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
} | } | ||
| + | .content_wrapper p { | ||
| + | padding: 0px 0px; | ||
| + | font-size: 0px; | ||
| + | margin: 0 0 0px; | ||
| + | } | ||
Latest revision as of 01:14, 20 October 2016
After carrying out laboratory work, the way we used to check if our work was successful was through electrophoresis using agarose gel 0.8; 1.2 and 1.5 depending on its need.
Our laboratory work began in June this year and since then, we have been working.
Now, we will see our performance in Lux:
Results
July 8th: our samples failed to be clear.
July 22nd: Too heated, without result.
July 22nd: the sample was too heated again, and we did not abtained any result.
July 23rd: performed in a small chamber gel 1.5, with Plux promoter, we weren´t able to see the two bands as espected..
July 30th: No result was obtained from all samples, it will be repeated.
August 5th: the expected samples could be clearly seen, the third tends to have two bands.
August 10th: plasmids concentrates, all the samples were completely able to be seen, getting the expected result.
August 12th: we turned to repeat samples to make sure everything is correct, then the plasmids were sent to cryogenics.
