Difference between revisions of "Judging"
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| − | + | <!-- | |
<div class="twoColumns "> | <div class="twoColumns "> | ||
<div class="full_border"> | <div class="full_border"> | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | + | --> | |
<div class="fourColumns"> | <div class="fourColumns"> | ||
| − | <h3> Judging Handbook </h3> | + | <h3> 2016 Judging Handbook </h3> |
| − | <p> | + | <p>The 2016 iGEM Judging Handbook is now available! The interactive pdf will help judges (and teams) through the evaluation process at the iGEM 2016 competition. <br><br> |
| − | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/ | + | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/46/Judging_handbook_2016.compressed_%281%29.pdf">Click to download!</a><p> |
| + | </div> | ||
| + | <div class="fourColumns"> | ||
| + | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/46/Judging_handbook_2016.compressed_%281%29.pdf"> | ||
| + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/73/2016_judging_handbook_image.png"> | ||
| + | </a> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | <div class=" | + | <div class="fourColumns"> |
| + | <h3> Judging at iGEM </h3> | ||
<p> Judging during iGEM focuses on evaluating team projects and presentations, while providing constructive and positive feedback to the teams. It is an integral part of iGEM's success and we hope you consider joining our voluntary judging team! </p> | <p> Judging during iGEM focuses on evaluating team projects and presentations, while providing constructive and positive feedback to the teams. It is an integral part of iGEM's success and we hope you consider joining our voluntary judging team! </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | + | <div class="fourColumns "> | |
| + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/ae/HQactive_listening.jpg" > | ||
| + | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 20:19, 4 August 2016
Welcome to judging in iGEM 2016! If you’re new to iGEM, you’re probably trying to make sense of our requirements, medal criteria, part submission guidelines and other facets of iGEM so that you can present a great project at the Giant Jamboree.
We made many changes to judging in 2015, so for the 2016 season we are focusing on consolidation. We don't intend to make too many changes to how the judging functions, only to take the best of judging and make it even better!
Information for Judges
2016 Judging Handbook
The 2016 iGEM Judging Handbook is now available! The interactive pdf will help judges (and teams) through the evaluation process at the iGEM 2016 competition.
Click to download!
Judging at iGEM
Judging during iGEM focuses on evaluating team projects and presentations, while providing constructive and positive feedback to the teams. It is an integral part of iGEM's success and we hope you consider joining our voluntary judging team!
