Difference between revisions of "Team:Paris Bettencourt/Notebook/Enzyme"
| Line 414: | Line 414: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/3b/Paris_Bettencourt-goldengate_goldengategel1.jpg" alt="proteingroupimage3" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/3b/Paris_Bettencourt-goldengate_goldengategel1.jpg" alt="proteingroupimage3" height=”200px” /> |
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/66/Paris_Bettencourt-goldengate_table1.png" alt="proteingroupimage3" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/66/Paris_Bettencourt-goldengate_table1.png" alt="proteingroupimage3" height=”200px” /> <br> |
<p class=”input”> | <p class=”input”> | ||
Revision as of 12:30, 27 September 2016
Week 18th -24th July
This week we designed the strategy for cloning all the proteins that we want to test in the pCOLA vector, and at the same time make everything compatible with the phytobrick format.
The table of proteins that we are working on is the following:
BG1 - beta-glucosidase from Vinis vinifera
bpul - laccase from Bacillus pumilus
catA - catechol-1,2-dioxygenase from Acinetobacter pittii
Cellulose Binding Domain
POO2 - polyphenol oxidase from Camellia sinensis
tanLpI - tannin acyl hydrolase from Lactobacillus plantarum
xylE - catechol-2,3-dioxygenase from Pseudomonas putida
How to clone using the pDUET – Golden Gate adapted plasmids
The first thing that you have to do it to codon optimise your sequence for E. coli. For that we used the IDT’s Codon Optimisation Tool (https://eu.idtdna.com/CodonOpt).
After doing the codon optimisation we checked if our sequence had any recognition site for the BpiI, BsaI and BsmBI. Those enzymes are widely used in the Phytobricks and there can therefore be no recognition size outside of the purposely designed (https://2016.igem.org/Resources/Plant_Synthetic_Biology/PhytoBricks). Correct the recognition sites using a codon usage table.
Attach the following to your optimised sequence:
To the 5’- attach a BsaI recognition site that will allow you to fit the part in the Phytobrick. The sequence must be as follows, to be able to fit in the already defined iGEM parts:
In order to be able to get a singe primer for amplifying all the different CDS after synthesis, we need to add a tail before the BsaI site that will allow us to create a universal primer.
We call this structure with the NNNNN + the BsaI site 5’ the extremity A (this will make sense later on, we promise).
When adding the extremity A to the sequence take into account that the extremity ends with a start codon, therefore eliminate the one from your CDS to get it in frame.
To the 3’- attach the His-tag and a BsaI recognition site. This will allow us to purify the protein and also fit the part in the Phytobrick.
Once again, take into account the fact that the sequence must be as follows to fit in the Phytobrick. If not designed like this the BsaI recognition site will continue to exist in our sequence after cloning and that could be a problem.
Before the BsaI 3’ recognition site, add a His-tag. Do not forget removing the STOP codon from the CDS to allow for fusion with the His-tag. This two together will create what we call the extremity C (once again, will make sense!).
The extremities A and C will permit us to clone the entire CDS + His-tag in our plasmid. Nonetheless, we might not want to clone the His-tag in the iGEM Phytobricks. In order to clone the CDS without the his-tag we will design some specific primers.
The common primers FW and RV will allow us to amplify all our CDS with the His-tag and directly clone them in our desired vector. They will also allow cloning the entire part in the Phytobricks.
The common primer FW and the CDS-specific RV will allow to clone only the CDS without the His-tag into the Phytobricks, and will also allow to attach a CBD to our proteins.
Example of primers (ignore the sequence of BsaI that has been added to the CDS sequence, it is only there because it is easier to design the primers like that in the software, they will not exist in the synthesised DNA, they will be present as TAILS. Take the STOP codons always into account!
Until here, a short resume of what has to have been done:
- Codon optimise
- Check for restriction enzymes and correct (BpiI, BsaI and BsmBI)
- Attach the 5’ extremity (A) and delete ATG
- Attach the 3’ extremity (C) and delete the STOP codon
- Design primers that are specific
Next, we need to design our CDB and attach to it the BsaI sites to clone it in the vector, Phytobricks and attach it to our CDS.
To the 5’- attach a BsaI recognition site that will allow you to fit the part in the Phytobrick with our gene in frame. The sequence must be as follows, to be able to fit in the already defined iGEM parts.
To the 3’- attach the His-tag and a BsaI recognition site as before. This will allow us to purify the protein and also fit the part in the Phytobrick.
Ordering of primers for golden gate and Gibson assembly
We also ordered the following primers for carrying out our strategy:
Name Sequence Scale Purification
FNS_1 GTAGTAGCTGCTATATGGTCTCAA 24 Standard desalting
FNS_2 CGATGGTCTCAAAGCTCAGT 20 Standard desalting
FNS_4 CGATGGTCTCAGGCTGAGGCTGAAGCACGGCGA 33 Standard desalting
FNS_6 CGATGGTCTCAGGCTGAGGGAGAATTCAAGAAGTTCTTAAACCA 44 Standard desalting
FNS_8 CGATGGTCTCAGGCTGACTGAATAATATCCATCGGGCG 38 Standard desalting
FNS_10 CGATGGTCTCAGGCTGAAGAGTCAAATTCAATTTTTACACCACCG 45 Standard desalting
FNS_12 CGATGGTCTCAGGCTGACTGACACAGACCGTCAATCCA 38 Standard desalting
FNS_14 CGATGGTCTCAGGCTGAAGTCAAAACAGTCATAAAACGTTCATTC 45 Standard desalting
FNS_15 GCTGACGACCGAGTCTCCGCA 21 Standard desalting
FNS_16 TACCGAAGATAGCTCATGTTATATCCCGC 29 Standard desalting
FNS_17 TTGCTCAGCGGTGGCAGCAG 20 Standard desalting
FNS_18 ATCGTATTGTACACGGCCGCAT 22 Standard desalting
FNS_19 TCGGAATCGCAGACCGATACCAGGA 25 Standard desalting
FNS_20 ATTTATGCCTCTTCCGACCATCAAGC 26 Standard desalting
FNS_21 ATGTTCGTCAGGGGGGCG 18 Standard desalting
FNS_22 TTGGGGAACTGCTTAACCTGGTAACT 26 Standard desalting
FNS_23 GTGAAAAGAAAAACCACCCTGGCG 24 Standard desalting
FNS_24 GTAATTCAGCTCCGCCATCGCC 22 Standard desalting
FNS_25 GACGCGCCGAGACAGAACTT 20 Standard desalting
FNS_26 CATGTTAGTCATGCCCCGCG 20 Standard desalting
Week 25th -31th July
This week we started the kombucha growing for the Imperial Protocol reproduction. We are redoing the protocol from their 2014 team to test for the binding of the Cellulose Binding Domains that we are using.
We are carrying out a similar protocol to the one we can find at https://2014.igem.org/Team:Imperial/Protocols
Such experiment aims to measure the affinity of the CBD to the cellulose after several washes with different solutions. The affinity is measured by reading the fluorescence of the Green Fluorescent Protein, GFP, fused with the CBD. The difference between the fluorescence before and after the washes can give a reference of the affinity of the Cellulose Binding Domain under different conditions of media.
We are also testing more washing solutions, such toluene and grape extract in addition to those tested by the Imperial College iGEM team, since they are more related with our future experiments.
This experiment aims to improve the available data regarding the part BBa_K1321357, submitted by iGEM imperial College team in 2014, and also to generate data and compare affinity of the GFP-CBD and the future proteins that we will fuse with CBD in our project.
Kombucha growing protocol
We got some old Kombucha from Juan Manuel García Arcos (iGEM team from 2014 and manager of the Open Science School).
We grew the kombucha as it follows:
800mL of ddH2O heated up
Add 100g of brown sugar and let dissolve
Add 3 sachets of green tea and let them infuse until it cools down (under 30ºC!)
Add 100mL of cider vinegar
Add 200mL of starter culture (comercial kombucha in juice)
Add a big piece of kombucha culture
Grow at 30ºC without shacking!
Preparation of the crude lysate for phusion protein assays
The first thing was to grow a 20ml inocule of the strain carrying the GFP-CBD protein, in our case it was the strain FS_S2, which is transformed with the part BBa_K1321357, submitted by the Imperial College team in 2014. Chloramphenicol (Crm) was added, since the plasmid carrying this part has Cm resistance.
Following we used the 20ml of such preculture as inocule of 1L of media, and let them grow overnight.
The cells grown overnight were collected by centrifuging at 4000rpm during 20min. They were then resuspended in 10ml of PBS, and collected again to remove all the residual media.
The remaining cells were resusended in B-PER Bacterial Protein Extraction Reagent, from Thermo Scientific. 4ml per gram of cells.
Icubated for 15mins and centrifuged 5minuetes at 15000rpm.
The supernatant was recovered and the GFP-CBD detected in it by looking at the fluorescence of the sample.
Then the cell lysates were stored at 4C until the day of the assay.
Week 1st-7th August
Preparation of the 96-well plates
In order to do that we mixed 6.4g of pure cellulose (435236-250G, Sigma-Aldrich) in 40ml of distilled water, to fill two 96 wells plates (with black plates for fluorescence measurement). Since the cellulose is almost insoluble in water the mix has to be shaken all the time while 200ul of it are added to each well. Also, due to the high viscosity of the mix we used the pipette of 1000ul to get 200ul.
Once we had all the wells full, the plates must be dried in the incubator at 37C one over night.
200 ul of cell extract was added to each well of the 96 wells plate already treated with cellulose, also the same was done with another plate but with 200ul of cell extract 1/10 diluted.
Rows A-H, columns 1-6 --> the concentration of cell extract is the original
Rows A-H, columns 7-12 --> the concentration of cell extract is 1/10 respect the original
The plate was incubated 24hours at 4C before the assay.
We carried out the assay as follows:
Measuring absorbance with 475 exication 510 emision, when the wells were full and when the liquid is removed in each case (just in the Imperial College iGEM team is described).
3 washes were done with the following solutions: water, PBS1x, ethanol 70%, BSA 5% w/w and grape extract to a concentration of 1mg/mL.
The positioning of each of the washes in the plate is as follows:
Because the results are too different and also because we need to test other subtracts, we will repeat the experiment in the future.
Weeks 8-14th and 15-21th August
On August the 11th our gBlocks finally arrived, so we could really start our work on the enzyme studies.
The first step was to clone the vector in which we will clone all of our enzymes. The vector (pCOLA-FS) is based on the pCOLA plasmid, only it only contains one T7 promoter, no cloning sites incompatible with the PhytoBricks, and also contains the lac operon under the remaining T7 promoter.
The idea of cloning the lac operon is to simplify the screening for the rightly cloned plasmids.
Gibson Assembly of the pCOLA-FS plasmid
The pCOLA-FS plasmid was assembled by Gibson Assembly from the following fragments:
- pCOLA-FS synthetic fragment This fragment is 1925bp long.
- pCOLA PCR product, amplified from primers FNS_15 and FNS_16. This fragment is 2128bp long.
For the Gibson Assembly of the pCOLA-FS itself, we calculated a molar ratio of 1:1 BackBone:insert, due to the size similarity of the two fragments, which did not justify having a 1:2 ratio. We used 100ng of the PCR fragment and 93ng of the synthetic fragment, in a total of 15uL of Gibson Assembly Mix (using New England’s Biolabs’ 2X Hifi DNA Assembly MasterMix. We incubated the mix 1h at 50ºC (protocol says to incubate it for 15min, but in our experience it works better if you incubate it for longer).
2uL of the final Gibson Assembly mix was transformed through chemical transformation to E. coli DH5alfa and plated in the corresponding antibiotics.
Golden Gate of the various pCOLA-FS plasmids
After we obtained the pCOLA-FS plasmid and checked it by sequencing, we began the cloning of the different pCOLA-FS plasmids carrying the different enzymes for testing.
For doing that, the first step was getting the fragments to clone using BsaI cloning.
The PCR reaction was carried out using ThermoFischer Phusion polymerase, because of its proofreading activity, and the PCR was carried out in a volume of 50uL (10uL 5X HF Buffer, 1uL 10mM dNTPs, 2.5uL of each primer, 2uL of the template (for 20bg), 1,5uL DMSO, 0.5uL pol and 30uL water). The PCR cycle was as follows: 98ºC 30’ – (98ºC 10’’ – 60ºC 20’’ – 72ºC 1’30’’)x33 – 72ºC 10’
After purification we run a gel to confirm the amplification:
Wells: 1.CBD – 2.pbuI_Ph – 3. bpuI – 4.tanLpI_ph – 5.tanLpI – 6.BG1_Ph – 7.BG1 – 8.xylE_Ph – 9.xylE – 10.PPO2_Ph – 11.PPO2 – 12.catA_Ph – 13.catA
Weeks 22-28th and 29th August – 4th September
During these two weeks we performed the Golden Gate to get our several plasmids.
It took us longer than we had originally expected because we run into some problems regarding the construction of the plasmids.
Luckily, we were able to figure the mistakes out. There were no mistakes in our designing of the cloning (uffff, we are happy about that, it would have been a disaster). There were nonetheless mistakes in the way we performed the protocol for Golden Gate.
We used the NEB Golden Gate Mix throughout all the attempts.
We started first by amplifying the fragments for the Golden Gate (as said already in the past week). IDT says that PCR should not be performed on their GBlocks in the case of them being bigger than 1000pb, which in all of our cases they are. Nonetheless, we needed to perform the PCR on the fragments because we needed different tails added to them.
The first Golden Gate protocol that we did was the one that is proposed by NEB for Golden Gates with up to 5 fragments (which is our case).
Total volume of reaction is 20uL. We added 2uL of the NEB Golden Gate Buffer, 75ng of plasmid (in our case 1.39uL), we kept a 2:1 molar ratio for each of the inserts, added 1uL of the Golden Gate Assembly Mix and added water up to the final volume.
We performed the proposed protocol of 1h at 37ºC an 5 min at 55ºC, and transformed the results into E. coli DH5alfa.
The following day we had a high number of colonies in our plates, all of them white (correct colour for the blue/white screening that we are performing).
Nonetheless, we performed PCR with our checking primers (ch1 and ch2/ch8) and all our bands were smaller than they were supposed to be. They seemed to be the size of what would be in the plasmid if the lacZ fragment had been correctly excised, and something quite small (up to 300pb) had been inserted.
The PCR was with Dreamtaq polymerase and as follows:
Volume per reaction 10ul:
- Mastermix --> 5ul
- ch1 --> 0.5 ul
- ch8 --> 0.5 ul
- DNA* --> 4ul
* DNA is actually the selected colony diluted in 20ul of destiled water.
PCR's settings:
1st- 10min -- 98C --> Cell lysis
2nd- 3min -- 95C --> Activation
3th- 30sec -- 95C --> Denaturailzation
4th- 30sec -- 55C --> Hybridation
5th- 2min -- 72C --> Elongation
Repeat from 3th to 5th 25 times
7 minutes -- 72C --> Final elongation
After the PCR we run an electrophoresis with the product:
As we can see only the gene xylE seems to be well cloned. Therefore we decided to repeat the electrophoresis.
After branstorming what this could be about, we decided to repeat the Golden Gate and this time use a protocol that we have seen often associated with Golden Gate and use directly the GBlocks for cloning.
GOLDEN GATE ASSEMBLY (10uL reaction)
- 40fmol of vector and insert
- 0.2 promega T4 ligase
- 1.0 promega T4 buffer
- 0.4 BSAI/BbiI
- Water until 20uL
Excel sheet for computing Golden Gate reactions
The settings for the Golden Gate reaction were as follows:
1. 37 C - 5 min
2. 37 C - 2 min
3. 16 C - 5 min
4. 50X back to 2
5. 37 C - 5 min (final digest)
6. 50 C - 10 min
7. 80 C - 10 min
The Golden Gate product was transformed by heat shock into thermo competents E.coli DH5-alpha and they were growth in LB plates with Kanamycin (50ug/ml), X-gal (20ng/ml) and IPTG (0.1mM), and growth overnigth at 37C.
We did so to do Blue/White screenning.
(Following the protocoles in the protocole section). We also transformed a negative control with the intact plasmid without being processed by the GG assembly.
Next day we observed white and blue colonies in the plates, and all blue in the negative control as is was expected. Therefore we selected those colonies of each clone which were white and we did colony PCR on them.
The PCR was performed with Dreamtaq polymerase and as follows:
Primers ch1 and ch8.
Volume per reaction 25ul:
- Mastermix --> 12.5ul
- Water --> 5ul
- ch1 --> 2.5 ul
- ch8 --> 2.5 ul
- DNA* --> 2.5ul
* DNA is actually the selected colony diluted in 20ul of destiled water.
PCR's settings:
1st- 10min -- 98C --> Cell lysis
2nd- 3min -- 95C --> Activation
3th- 30sec -- 95C --> Denaturailzation
4th- 30sec -- 55C --> Hybridation
5th- 2min -- 72C --> Elongation
Repeat from 3th to 5th 25 times
7 minutes -- 72C --> Final elongation
After the PCR we ran an electrophoresis with the product but the gel was empty, it might have been because the polymerase Dream taq we were using was spoilt since the control wasn't amplifyed, therefore we repeated the PCR with another aliquote of Dream taq polymerase under the same conditions of PCR and after we run a new electrophoresis.
The Control plasmids is a PCR where only clean plasmid (after miniprep) was added.
The Control clony corresponds with a common colony PCR with an strain which contains the pFNS0, our backbone plasmid.
Finally we had reason to be happy :D. Since we had some positives. In this case all the clones except BGI.
Therefore we could start doing the phusion proteins, since we had all the clones for the proteins with only the His-tag.
In parallel we run another PCR but changing a detail, we realized that if we did the cell lysis in the thermocycler, as it had been done until now (see above), the resolution of the electrophoresis was not so good, then we decided to repeat the electrophoresis but doing the lysis before in a thermoblock.
The protocol followed is the following:
1º 5min - 100C --> Cell lysis
2º 5sec - vortex --> Homogenization
3º 3min - centrifuge 6000g --> Pelleting the cell debris
4º collect SuperNatant
The PCR was with Dreamtaq polymerase and as follows:
Primers ch1 and ch2.
Volume per reactio 50ul: (50ul to ensure that we have DNA in the 2ul of DNA we use)
- Mastermix --> 25ul
- Water --> 19ul
- ch1 --> 2 ul
- ch2 --> 2 ul
- DNA* --> 2 ul
*It is the SN collected after the cell lysis.
PCR's settings:
1nd- 3min -- 95C --> Activation
2th- 30sec -- 95C --> Denaturailzation
3th- 30sec -- 55C --> Hybridation
4th- 2min -- 72C --> Elongation
Repeat from 2th to 5th 25 times
7 minutes -- 72C --> Final elongation
After this an electrophoresis (agarose 1%) was carried out:
As we can see this gel shows again positives , even one for BGI. We decided to do miniprep of the following clones:
1.3 and 1.4 (bpuI)
2.3 and 2.5 (catA)
3.3 and 3.4 (tanLpI)
4.4 and 4.5 (PPO)
5.3 (BGI)
The results of the miniprep of this clones are:
After the normal proteins were golden gated, we starte the GG for the six fuision proteins. To do that we did PCR first.
This GG mix contains the gblocks amplified two weeks ago with the primers which allow to have cohesive end in 3' with the 5' of the CBD protein, once it has been digested with BsaI, and the CBD gblock we used is the one coming directly from the product IDT supplied us.
The protocol we followed was the same that worked before:
For a final volume of 10 uL
x 40 fmol of vector and insert
1ul Buffer 10x
0.5ul Assembly mix
x dH2O (until 10ul)
-----------------------------
10 uL total
Settings
1. 37 C - 5 min
2. 37 C - 2 min
3. 16 C - 5 min
4. 50X back to 2
5. 37 C - 5 min (final digest)
6. 50 C - 10 min
7. 80 C - 10 min
To compute the quantities to add of DNA we used the excel sheet shown before.
+33 1 44 41 25 22/25
igem2016parisbettencourt@gmail.com 