Our process
Our Process is applicable on many ways
Our process concentrate metals, especially platinum and transform it into a highly valuable form, nanoparticles.
To obtain this valuable product, our process begin with raw, worthless, and plentiful materials that can be found almost anywhere since the accumulation due to the catalyst converter occurs everywhere there is a car traffic (urban and road areas). The substrates can be harvest directly in the environment, as some of them presents impressive concentrations like the road dust or the air borne dust.
However,it would be much more relevant to integrate our process at the end of an already existing process of treatment, to plug it to the actual network of process. Moreover, solutions of phytoremediation provide a lot of substrates and by-products our project could start from. As most of our process occurs in a controlled environment almost any substrate could be convenient to enter in our process. We could start our process just after the incineration of phytoremedial plants or on the digestat produced by a methanisation
If the raw materials change (substrate), only the first step of our project would change if the basic matter change.
Indeed our process could start from ashes
in this part w*'lldetail an industrialized process of what we plan to test in lab condition. We'll focus on SLUDGES
The Source (step1)
Sewage Sludge
(Incineration)
Ashes
Bioleaching
The Bioleaching process allow a far better recovery of platinum. Indeed, the drop of pH is required for the metals solubilization. This step could be realized with chemicals as chlorhydric acid in the actual industry. But in order to achieve a greener process as possible, we decided to lower the pH with biological ways, as the leaching accomplished by Thiobacillus. This method is widely use in mines, e.g. for copper mines in South America, so this will be a reliable step already tested in industrial conditions.
This method rely on the ability of the bacteria Thiobacilus to acidify its medium until a pH of 1. The bacterium solution is applied on the ashes and liquid part dropping from it constitute the leachate i.e. a very acidified solutions containing solubilized metals particles mostly in ionic form. With this process we hope reach the same leach yield as obtained if realized with Chlorhydric acid i.e. 30% of leached platinum[1].
This step wouldn't be obligatory in our process, but it could improve our recovery yield while still using a environmentally friendly approach. Moreover, after leaching, the remained ashes will present a decreased concentration in metals. If this concentrations are lowered enough, the ashes are now ready to be spreaded on fields. Of courses before it, steps of alcanization and destruction of potentially Thiobacillus cells should be performed. If concentrations are still too high for spreading, this step may be repeated.
This step consist in spreading a Thiobacillus solution on the ashes then recollecting the produced leachate. This step could be also realised not with Thiobacillus but with chemicals solutions.
Siderophore mediated leaching
Even if almost 30 % of platinum has been leached by the drop of pH we need to improve the proportion of leached platinum. As we worked with synthetic biology, we decided to use what it is commonly employed by cells to catch metals, i.e. siderophore. Siderophores are well known to catch iron most of all but some of them have an affinity with others metals as platinum. So in our process, we planned to work with such a siderophore, called Desferrioxamine B. This one is already employed to leach platinum in mines, and have shown high capacity to leach platinum from ores [2].
Leaching yields with DFHOB can reach 78% of the total platinum if both of these conditions are fully respected: a lowering pH level leaching step should be performed, as well as a alcanization of medium (until a pH range between 8 and 9) just before addition of siderophore. The last step devoted to rise up the pH level will be realized using a standard buffer, e.g. a Tris buffer.
So where is the innovation in this step? Firstly, in our case, DFHOB won't be applied on the same materials where is commonly used, in our cases not ores but a leachate of ashes. Basically the main difference will be the metal concentration.
Secondly, DFHOB is usually synthesized chemically, we'll rather produce it in high amounts with bacteria. Indeed, operon of the Desferrioxamine B biosynthesis from Streptomyces coelicolor will be cloned into a E. coli bacteria strains in order to produce it, hence lowering the costs of required basic matter as production by bacteria needs especially an appropriate medium and good growth conditions.
DFHOB is a derivative of diamines moelcule and therefore its Biosynthesis start with an amino acid, lysine. Lysine is quite expansive, and as we are aware about the cost of our process we decided to use a cheap source of lysine the corn steep liquor. Such a lysine source is already in use in industry since it's cheap, amino acid provided, produced in industrial amounts and well known as a excellent source of nitrogen in growth media. So in this step we hope we could produce DFHOB in high quantities with a affordable cost. Moreover, successful DFHOB production has been reported using corn steep as a source of nitrogen and amino acids[3].
Following previous uses of DFHOB, 78% of platinum can be leached with 3mM DFHOB solution on 100g at 5ppm platinum concentrated ore. That allow us to estimate that in order to reach a 78% yield (max yield obtained) we 'll need to add approximately 3mg of DFHOB per µg of platinum (see Raw calculations). Of course this number a based on leaching on ore sample, so maybe we can expect higher yields for the ashes are probably easier to leach than the ore.
CALCULS POUR 1G COMBIEN PRODUIT UNE ECOLI DE DFHOB,,???
For a situation of 1g of intial platinum, 4.68 moles of DFHOB will be needed to leach it (see Raw calculations).
To sum up, this step consist in adding an appropriated quantity of Siderophore producer E. coli to the leachate.
Siderophore producer lysis
Our engineered E. coli, i.e. our siderophore producer will produce a lot of DFHOB molecules in its cytoplasm after induction. But theory tell us that all produced molecules may not go out of the cell hence the membranous export system of E. coli is not adapted to the DFHOB. To resolve this we decided to realize the lyse of bacteria in order to release the totality of siderophore molecules in the media.
Several reliable industrial lysis techniques are available to perform this step, essentially centrifugation or filtration.
This step consist in lyse the bacterial cells.
Siderophore recoverer addition
Until this step, except for the incineration in the first step, actions realized in our process were primarily focused on solubilize the platinum by leaching (acid mediated and siderophore mediated). But f leaching is clearly recommended to improves solubilization of metals, it does not improves the concentrations.
To do so we'll use the ability of Streptomyces coelicolor to import specifically the DFHOB.
Given that the siderophore have been released on the media, the majority of platinum (most of all in a ionic form) is now strongly bounded with it. It has to be noted that DFHOB specificity is not perfect, so many others metals should from complex with it, especially iron.
In this step we aim to take back the complex siderophore-platinum from the media. As Streptomyces coelicolor is a DFHOB producer organism, it possess the appropriate system to import it. That why a certain amount of S. coelicolor will be added in the growth media during an optimized time of incubation.
We can estimate the amount of bacteria we have to add and also the time of incubation knowing the input capacity of bacteria.
Indeed previous study on uptake of DFHOB was realized and allow us to estimate time of incubation and amounts of bacteria we have to add in order to recover the maximum of platinum. However the measures of uptake in this study concern DFHOB bound to iron and not by Streptomyces coelicolor but by a very close specie, Streptomyces pilosus[4].
Following this study, DFHOB uptake is approximately of 2.65 nmol/(mg cell(dry weight).h).
It has to be noted that the more cells will be in contact with DFHOB the lower will be the cell amount to add (see Raw calculations). The time is the main factor of the total quantity imported: as the metal-siderophore complex is disrupted, the equilibrium of the reaction of importation never will be reached, so bacteria will continue to import siderophore until there is not more left.
For a situation with 1 g initial platinum, and with 10 hours of incubation, the wet weight of cells to had will be 3532 kg (see Raw calculations).
In this step, a certain quantity of S. coelicolor will be added to the media during determined duration.
At this step, S. coelicolor cells have imported the vast majority of Siderophore-platinum complexes. The aim of this step is to remove the bacteria from the solution and hence remove platinum with it. Several industrial techniques are relevant to do that as centrifugation or ultrafiltration. At the end of both of these techniques, the cells will be separated from the ashes.
This step allow two important things :
-The sludge ashes contained in the leachate will be rid of the metals especially since the siderophore would have caught a lot of others metals.
This allow the spreading in the fields of the sludge ashes, thus answering the great issue of the sewage sludge problematic.
If the metals concentration are not lowered enough to permit spreading, a additional removing metal process should be performed (step 4 to 7).
-It move platinum from the whole solution space to the cells cytoplasm space, thus increasing its concentration by reduction of the volume.
The concentration of platinum can be deducted from the weight of cells where it has been imported. So very clearly we can draw a trend: the more step 6 is longer, the less cells will be needed to import all siderophore, the more platinum will be concentrated. see
In the situation with 1g of initial platinum the concentration will be of 220.84µg/kg (see Raw calculations).
This step consist in removing the cells either by centrifugation or by filtration. At this step, all remained sludge ashes get out of the process.
Siderophore recoverer destruction
Once the siderophore has fulfilled its function we need to get rid of it. Indeed the bound between platinum and it is very strong and it would be irrelevant to try to destroy it. That's why we decided to destroy the siderophore itself by a thermal degradation that is to say a incineration. This step will destroy the main componenent of the cells, will remove the water and will destroy most of molecules, including our siderphore. As in the first step the burning will reduce the volume of the our materials (from cells to ashes) therefore enhancing its platinum and others metals concentration by a X20 factor.
In the situation with 1 g of initial platinum, the concentration will of 4.41 mg/kg( see
This step present another advantage: in the next step, the most wanted form of platinum is a ionic one and high heat is well known to produce rather ionic particles. Thus the next step will be performed in best conditions.
In this step cells filtrates or pellets are incinerated, the rest of the process will be performed with the produced ashes.
Biosorption
The aim of its step is the conversion of platinum into its final processed form: nanoparticles.
Biosorption can be performed along biological structures since biologic components are known to be excellent sorbents. We planned to perform biosorption along a flagella. Indeed, metallic ions can be sorbed along flagella [5] thus enhancing concentrations. Moreover this step will form nanoparticles because of the reducing power of biological molecules, especially amines contained in proteins is supposed enough to convert ions into reduced (solid) particles.
Experiments should allow to determine which one of the flagella from either Escherichia coli or from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans is the best candidate for biosorption.
In order to optimized the formation of nanoparticles and most of all its specificity on platinum, this step should be realized with engineered flagella, containing small platinum catching peptids [6].
Given their specificity, it should be enough to ensure the majority of produced nanoparticles will be made up of platinum ones.
In practice, ashes of the previous step will be poured in a engineered purified flagella containing solution and incubate with an optimized temperature an duration.
Once the process is performed, nanoparticles will be display all along flagella, and the levels of ionic platinum particles remained free in the solution should be really low.
Sadly it is pretty hard to estimate the concentration factor involved in this step as well as the diameter of obtained nanoparticles. DIAMETRE ARTCILES
estimation avec volume d'un flagelle?
example avecle process
This step consist mainly in pouring the ashes in a solution containing engineered purified flagella and incubating with an optimized temperature and duration.
Final recovery
Now,most of the platinum contained in the solution is now bound to the flagella and in a form of nanoparticles.
The overall complex (nanoparticles+flagella) has a much more higher density than the rest of solution (water and ions), so its isolation will be performed with centrifugation. As the volume of the fraction of interest should be reduced dramtically (pellet) the concentration in platinum in the isolated fraction should increase in a significant way.
Here again it's pretty hard to make an estimation of the platinum content enhancement, but if we can suppose that the purified protein volume will not exceed a tenth of the total volume once centrifugated, we can reckon on a concentration increase by a factor X10.
example with our process.....difjqghak
This final step rely on a simple centrifugation with the recollection of the pellet. This pellet is highly enriched in platinum nanoparticles and is actually the processed product.
Further purification steps
This step is not supposed to be tested in lab conditions by our team. Besides we can imagine that further purification step couldbe wished on the final product in order to a increase the quality of the product:
-proteolyse
-thermal degradation
-exchanges on an affinity columns....
Prix de sigma pour des nano particules?
Glossary
Bioleaching : in simple words, leaching is a metal extraction technique which rely on solubilization of metals ores (ore must be soluble and impurities must be insoluble) in a aqueous solution, by using strong acid solutions. The leachate is the solution containing the solubilized metals of interest. Bioleaching in the same process but involves uses of living organism.
DFHOB: Desferioxamine B, is a molecule produced by (among others) Streptomyces pilosus [7] able to catch metals (as platinum) with a very high affinity.
Corn steep liquor: a by-product of an industrial process (wet-milling) applied on corn kernels. As the kernels are steeped in water solution, the process produce an amino acid, vitamins and minerals enriched solution in high volumes.
Biosorption: it is a process which occurs on biomass. It concentrate and bind components onto biological structures by the phenomenon of sorption. The structure is called a sorbent. In industry it can be used to concentrate or to remove an components from a solution.
Raw calculations
Quantities of DHOB per µg of platinum
Our basic data come from an study realized on the efficency of leaching by DFHOB [8].
An experiment of leaching at pH 8.2 during 120h using DFHOB was carried out on 100g of platinum whose concentration was approximately 5ppm. The maximum efficiency of leaching by siderophore has reached a value of 50% with a DHOB concentration of 3mM (higher concentration lead to a lower efficiency). If we combined the value of leaching occurred with the drop of pH (in the study by Hcl treatment, in our case with Thiobacillus) and the value occurred with leaching, we reach a value of 78% of the total platinum leached.
==> 100g at 5ppm => 5µg/g, so 500µg of pure platinum. 3mM of DFHOB= 1.68 g given the DFHOB molar mass= 560,684g.mol. So we have roughly (1.68/500) = 3.36mg of DFHOB/µg of platinum We can also have the molar value of 6 µmol of DFHOB/µg of platinum.
For a situation of 1g of initial platinum, 78% of the total mean 0.78g. So (6*0.78) = 4.68 moles of DFHOB.
Weight of cells needed for importation
The total mass of cells needed to import all the DFHOB is dependent of the time of incubation. GRAPHIQUE
In a situation with 1 g of initial platinum, during 10h of incubation:
-the uptake is equal to (2.65*10^(-6)*10)= 2.65*10^(-2) µmol/g of cells (dry wt)
-the total of DFHOB to import is 4.68 moles so ((4.68/2.65*10^(-2))/1000)= 176.6 kg of dry cells
- as the dry weight is en tenth of the wet one and thtat a pellet is composed half by water, the mass of the cell pellet to add will be (176.6*10*2)= 3532 kg
Concentration in the pellet
We consider that all the siderophore bound to the platinum has been imported in the volume of the cells at the end of the incubation?
graphique??
For a situation with 1g of initial platinum,with an incubation of 10 hours, the concentration is (0.78/3532)= 220.84µg/kg
Concentration in the pellet ashes
Basically, after a combustion a wet cells volume is divided by a factor > 20
In the situation with 1 g initial platinum, the concentration will be (2.20*10^(-4)*20)= 4.41 mg/kg
- ↑ Bau and al., 2015 http://dx.doi.org.gate1.inist.fr/10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.01.002
- ↑ Bau and al., 2015 http://dx.doi.org.gate1.inist.fr/10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.01.002
- ↑ Mehrabi et al., 2010 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21313893
- ↑ Muller and raymond., 1984 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC214717/
- ↑ Deplanche and al., 2008 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.gate1.inist.fr/doi/10.1002/bit.21966/epdf
- ↑ Seker and Demir., 2011 http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.gate1.inist.fr/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&sid=77d9b085-94fc-4bd0-8105-229d3ddc0e9c%40sessionmgr4010&hid=4202
- ↑ Müller, Matzanke and Raymond., 1984 https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0021137021&origin=inward&txGid=0
- ↑ Bau and al., 2015 http://dx.doi.org.gate1.inist.fr/10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.01.002
