Difference between revisions of "Judging"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Mobile}} | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| Line 21: | Line 15: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
<div class="clear"></div> | <div class="clear"></div> | ||
Revision as of 18:40, 23 March 2016
Welcome to judging in iGEM 2016! If you’re new to iGEM, you’re probably trying to make sense of our requirements, medal criteria, part submission guidelines and other facets of iGEM so that you can present a great project at the Giant Jamboree.
We made many changes to judging in 2015, so for the 2016 season we are focusing on consolidation. We don't intend to make too many changes to how the judging functions, only to take the best of judging and make it even better!
Information for Judges
Want to be a Judge for iGEM 2016?
Enter your email to be notified when the Judging Application is open:
Judging Handbook
Learn more how teams are evaluated in the 2015 judging handbook
2015 Judging Handbook
Judging during iGEM focuses on evaluating team projects and presentations, while providing constructive and positive feedback to the teams. It is an integral part of iGEM's success and we hope you consider joining our voluntary judging team!
