Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
[[File:T--Austin UTexas--KOM4withgfpandcirclesfixed.png|thumb|left|600px|Using a fluorescent microscope, this was a picture taken of the potential transconjugant, KOM 4, with the plasmid GFP. '''16s sequencing was still needed to confirm successful conjugation.''']] | [[File:T--Austin UTexas--KOM4withgfpandcirclesfixed.png|thumb|left|600px|Using a fluorescent microscope, this was a picture taken of the potential transconjugant, KOM 4, with the plasmid GFP. '''16s sequencing was still needed to confirm successful conjugation.''']] | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
+ | <br><br><br><br> | ||
+ | <br><br><br><br> | ||
+ | <br><br><br><br> | ||
+ | <br><br><br><br> | ||
+ | <br><br><br><br> | ||
<br><br><br><br> | <br><br><br><br> | ||
<br><br><br><br> | <br><br><br><br> | ||
Line 40: | Line 45: | ||
<p>We then picked these glowing colonies and then after streaking them out onto more LB+Spec plates, we attempted to use 16s sequencing to confirm successful conjugation. After troubleshooting our 16s procedure, we were finally able to obtain a viable sequencing result. However, all of the glowing colonies were identified as <i>E. coli</i>. For the next round of conjugation, we used a strain of both <i>G. oxydans</i> and <i>Gluconacetobacter hansenii</i> from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). | <p>We then picked these glowing colonies and then after streaking them out onto more LB+Spec plates, we attempted to use 16s sequencing to confirm successful conjugation. After troubleshooting our 16s procedure, we were finally able to obtain a viable sequencing result. However, all of the glowing colonies were identified as <i>E. coli</i>. For the next round of conjugation, we used a strain of both <i>G. oxydans</i> and <i>Gluconacetobacter hansenii</i> from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
− | [[File:T--Austin UTexas--FixedLB+DAP2ndconj.jpeg|thumb|left|300px|This is a LB+DAP plate on a dark reader that has four different conjugations occurring at one time. The two left quadrants have the same ATCC strain of <i>G. oxydans,/i>, while the two quadrants on the right have <i>Ga. hansenii</i>.]] | + | [[File:T--Austin UTexas--FixedLB+DAP2ndconj.jpeg|thumb|left|300px|This is a LB+DAP plate on a dark reader that has four different conjugations occurring at one time. The two left quadrants have the same ATCC strain of <i>G. oxydans,</i>, while the two quadrants on the right have <i>Ga. hansenii</i>.]] |
<html> | <html> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 16:01, 10 October 2016
Conjugation
We have attempted to conjugate GFP into both G. oxydans and G. hansenii with a Diaminopimelic Acid (DAP) auxotrophic strain of E. coli . The plasmid contains the vector pMMB67EH, the promoter PA-1, GFP and a spectinomycin resistance gene.
The first conjugation was done with KOM strains 4 (G. oxydans) 5 ( G. oxydans and 15 ( L. fermentati ). We attempted these conjugations before sequencing the recipient strains, so that is why we tried to conjugate into L. fermentati . First, a mixture between a KOM strain and the DAP auxotroph strain were plated on a LB+DAP solid medium to allow for conjugation to occur. After 24 hours of incubation, I scraped up the growth and plated each conjugation mixture onto a LB+Spec plate.
Next, we viewed the potential transconjugants on a fluorescence microscope.
We then picked these glowing colonies and then after streaking them out onto more LB+Spec plates, we attempted to use 16s sequencing to confirm successful conjugation. After troubleshooting our 16s procedure, we were finally able to obtain a viable sequencing result. However, all of the glowing colonies were identified as E. coli. For the next round of conjugation, we used a strain of both G. oxydans and Gluconacetobacter hansenii from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).