Jegjohnston (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 1,064: | Line 1,064: | ||
<li class="c0"><span>Potential skin irritation may occur. Our initial mouse trials however have shown no signs of inflammation.</span> | <li class="c0"><span>Potential skin irritation may occur. Our initial mouse trials however have shown no signs of inflammation.</span> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
− | <li class="c0"><span>The safety of the radioprotective patch was assessed by conducting </span><span class="c8 c1">in vivo</span><span class="c1"> mouse trails to test the patch, safety of the bacteria and the protein BBI. The mouse trial protocol was followed and approved by the <a href="http://www.ucalgary.ca/research/researchers/ethics-compliance/animal-use-protocols">Health Sciences Animal Care Committee (HSACC)</a> who review animal care and testing.</span> | + | <li class="c0"><span>The safety of the radioprotective patch was assessed by conducting </span><span class="c8 c1">in vivo</span><span class="c1"> mouse trails to test the patch, safety of the bacteria and the protein BBI. <b>The mouse trial protocol was followed and approved by the <a href="http://www.ucalgary.ca/research/researchers/ethics-compliance/animal-use-protocols">Health Sciences Animal Care Committee (HSACC)</a> who review animal care and testing. </b></span> |
</li> | </li> | ||
− | <li class="c0"><span class="c1">Documentation of ethics approval from the animal studies | + | <li class="c0"><span class="c1">Documentation of ethics approval from the animal studies is available upon request as it contains confidential information that can not be made publicly available.</span> |
</li> | </li> | ||
<h3><span >Containment</span></h3> | <h3><span >Containment</span></h3> |
Revision as of 21:15, 16 October 2016
Safety
Safety Considerations in the Lab
How we prepared for lab work
How we prepared for lab work
All Principal Investigators, mentors, and undergraduate researchers were required to complete lab safety training and complete safety courses developed by Environment Health and Safety (EHS) prior to working in the lab. The mandatory safety training courses included updated versions of the WHMIS course, an occupational health and safety course, a laboratory safety course, a hazard assessment course, an incident reporting and investigation course, a spill response course, a biosafety program course, a biosafety laboratory course, and a biosafety bloodborne pathogens course. The courses cover biological containment protocols, handling of hazardous materials such as liquid nitrogen, and disposal of waste, as well as standard safety and laboratory practices. All were required to take a test following each course, which certifies safe lab work under EHS Guidelines. All team members, advisors, and mentors received credit for each listed course and training program, and supervisors were present in the lab at all times to oversee undergraduate work.
The University of Calgary has a university-wide Biosafety Committee, whose guidelines for safe biological laboratory practices were adhered to throughout the project. The team’s lab benches and experimental plans were assessed and deemed safe to proceed with by the Biosafety Committee. The Environment Health and Safety (EHS) provided additional training for individuals working with radiation and irradiated cells.
Our project utilized Bacillus subtilis and a commonly used lab-strain of Escherichia coli, TOP10. Both are non-pathogenic and non-infectious, and are classified as Biosafety Level 1 organisms (BSL-1). These organisms, therefore, posed no significant risk to researchers. Since these BSL1 cells (E.coli and B.subtilis) have GRAS labelling, our main project did not require ethics approval by the review boards. Some team members worked with HCT116 cell lines and 1BR3 cell lines, which are human colon carcinoma and human skin fibroblast cell lines that are classified as Biosafety Level 2(BSL-2).The cell lines were received from completely anonymous donors. We handled these cell lines at containment level 2 in accordance with the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard and Biosafety Committee guidelines.
Safety Considerations for the Device
Structure of the Patch
Choosing Patch Materials
Considering Human Use
Containment
Future Considerations for Patch Design
If we can determine a better membrane that prevents the diffusion of the bacteria, we can use a two layer semi permeable system where the first layer prevents the diffusion of the bacteria and a second layer which further filters BBI for diffusion.
Safe disposal:
Safety considerations of Biobrick parts
Future Considerations
We would engineer inducible kill switches that could eradicate the bacteria if need be. A kill switch in Bacillus would be designed as engineering a kill switch into standardized plasmids could be useful for future iGEM competitions. Additionally, integrating BBI in multiple sites would give more auxotrophic sites, increasing the safety of using B.subtilis in the device.
Safety forms: