Zigapusnik (Talk | contribs) |
Zigapusnik (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 156: | Line 156: | ||
<p style = "clear:both;"></p> | <p style = "clear:both;"></p> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
<div style="clear:left; float:left;"> | <div style="clear:left; float:left;"> | ||
<figure data-ref="3.3.5."> | <figure data-ref="3.3.5."> | ||
Line 165: | Line 163: | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <p>HEK293 cells expressing gas vesicle-forming proteins exhibited increased sensitivity to ultrasound stimulation, even in the absence of exogenous mechanosensitive channels (<ref>3.3.6.</ref>), which was most likely due to activation of the endogenous mechanosensitive channels in mammalian cells.</p> | + | <p>A toxicity test was performed in order to ensure that gas vesicles were not toxic to mammalian cells. <ref>3.3.5.</ref> shows that the viability of cells was not altered when expressing gas vesicle forming proteins.</p> |
+ | <p style = "clear:both;">HEK293 cells expressing gas vesicle-forming proteins exhibited increased sensitivity to ultrasound stimulation, even in the absence of exogenous mechanosensitive channels (<ref>3.3.6.</ref>), which was most likely due to activation of the endogenous mechanosensitive channels in mammalian cells.</p> | ||
<div style = "clear:both;" align="center"> | <div style = "clear:both;" align="center"> | ||
<figure data-ref="3.3.6."> | <figure data-ref="3.3.6."> |
Revision as of 12:03, 17 October 2016
Gas vesicles
For activation of mechanoreceptors TRPC1 or MscS, a high-power ultrasound wave (900 Vpp) is required. Our aim was to improve responsiveness of cells to respond to the lower power of ultrasound as this would increase the selectivity, avoiding stimulation of endogenous channels and prevent cell damage. We decided to test gas-filled lipid microbubbles, since it has been reported that microbubbles can amplify the ultrasonic signal
Microbubbles are small gas-filled lipid vesicles which are used as contrast agents in medicine. Their size is in the range of micrometers. They work by resonating in an ultrasound beam, rapidly contracting and expanding in response to the pressure changes of the sound wave
Results
Microbubbles
Properties of microbubbles for example rigidity, are affected by the composition of the lipid membrane and the gas core. We prepared our lipid microbubbles from a mixture of DSPC:DSPE. Before sonication we added gas perfluorohexane (as described in the Protocols section), which facilitates compression and expansion of the microbubbles upon ultrasound stimulation (3.3.1.A). A heterogeneous mixture of microbubbles in the range from 5 to 100 µm in size were generated by this procedure (3.3.1.B). Microbubbles are most effective in the size range corresponding to the resonance frequency of the ultrasound. However care has to be taken in the applied energy to prevent cavitation, that can sonoporate cell membranes.
Application of microbubbles to cells expressing mechanosensitive channel MscS significantly improved calcium influx after mechanical stimulation using low-power ultrasound wave (450 Vpp) (3.3.2.).
However, there are some drawbacks related to the use of lipid microbubbles, as their delivery requires injection into the selected tissue. Additionally lifetime of lipid microbubbles is limited in the tissue to tens of minutes and they need to be prepared freshly at least once a week.
To overcome the described drawback we thought of alternative options. One idea that initially looked too crazy to work was to use genetically encoded gas vesicles that are produced in bacteria. Bacterial gas vesicles have been used as contrasting agents for ultrasonography in animals
Gas vesicles are stable gas-filled structures, which provide buoyancy in a wide variety of planktonic prokaryotes
HEK293 cells were transfected with plasmids expressing both gas vesicle forming proteins, GvpA and GvpC. We could obtain GvpC from the Registry and added to its characterization, while the plasmid for GvpA could not be recovered and its coding sequence was synthesized using mammalian codon usage. Expression of both proteins was confirmed by the western blot (3.3.3.) and colocalization was observed by confocal microscopy (3.3.4.).
A toxicity test was performed in order to ensure that gas vesicles were not toxic to mammalian cells. 3.3.5. shows that the viability of cells was not altered when expressing gas vesicle forming proteins.
HEK293 cells expressing gas vesicle-forming proteins exhibited increased sensitivity to ultrasound stimulation, even in the absence of exogenous mechanosensitive channels (3.3.6.), which was most likely due to activation of the endogenous mechanosensitive channels in mammalian cells.
In order to maximize the sensitivity of cells to ultrasound, we transfected cells with a combination of mechanosensitive channel MscS and gas vesicle-forming proteins. By decreasing the power of ultrasound stimulation we demonstrated that cells expressing a combination of both ectopic channels and gas vesicles were activated as a result of the ultrasound stimulation (3.3.7.).
To prove that calcium influx was the mediator of activation of mechanosensitive channels, we used an inhibitor of ion channels gadolinium (Gd3+), which has high charge density and similar ionic radius to Ca2+ .By blocking the pore of the channel it acts as an general inhibitor of calcium ion channels
This is the first time demonstration that that gas vesicle-forming proteins can be expressed in human cells and that they improve the sensitivity of mechanosensitive channels for ultrasound. Moreover when the gas vesicle-forming proteins were co-expressed with ectopic ion channels the calcium influx could be achieved with low-power ultrasound.
Ultrasound is a type of mechanical stimulus, therefore we reasoned that cells might exhibit response also to other types of stimulus such as the touch. The next task was to couple the response of mechanosensitive channels to the mediator of signaling or to the genetically encoded reporter. Mediator of this activation are Ca2+ ions, which are sensed by different cellular proteins and which have been in the literature detected by several designed sensors. The mechanosensing device was then coupled to the calcium split luciferase reporter based on M13 and calmodulin or can be coupled to the protease split system and response of cells was determined against mechanical stimulus in a Touchpaint implementation.