Difference between revisions of "Team:Aix-Marseille/Integrated Practices/history"

(Question 5)
(Question 6)
Line 51: Line 51:
 
<html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fBBLxtoobzU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></html>
 
<html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fBBLxtoobzU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></html>
  
===Question 6===
+
==='''How the notion of mining resources availability has been apprehended throughout history?'''===
 +
 
 +
''"This is a conception between two ideas, the availability of fields and the prospecting work that allow discovering fields that were not observable before. So we can never know all the available resources, further studies have to be done to discover new fields."''
 +
 
 
<html><video width="480" controls src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/86/T--Aix-Marseille--minevielle_6.mp4"></html>
 
<html><video width="480" controls src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/86/T--Aix-Marseille--minevielle_6.mp4"></html>
 
  PROBLE LA
 
  PROBLE LA

Revision as of 19:19, 17 October 2016