Difference between revisions of "Team:Sheffield/Integrated Practices"

Line 316: Line 316:
 
<p> <h2> Overview </h2> </p>
 
<p> <h2> Overview </h2> </p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Our work in human practices is set out to study the societal implications of our project. The findings informed our understanding of antibiotic resistance as a problem. Most importantly, this was then used to improve the design of our project beyond a pure biological and engineering point of view, but from a point of view of the stakeholders. We achieve this by modifying our design to their needs.
+
Have a look at the sections below to follow us on our journey to better understand the antibiotic resistance problem we set out to solve, interacting with the different stakeholders, and then coming back to the lab to advise the different project aspects so we could adapt. We did not simply make conclusions on the stakeholders’ needs through researching secondary sources, but actually went out and spoke to different stakeholders personally.  
 
</P>
 
</P>
  
<p>
 
We did not simply make conclusions on the stakeholders’ needs through researching secondary sources but actually went out and spoke to different stakeholders personally.
 
</P>
 
  
<p>
 
We did more than just interview experts and stakeholders. To explore how we expanded  and see how we integrated stakeholders’ opinions in the design of our project, please see the sections below. </p>
 
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
 
<!--
 
<!--

Revision as of 12:38, 18 October 2016

A template page

HUMAN PRACTICES

Overview

Have a look at the sections below to follow us on our journey to better understand the antibiotic resistance problem we set out to solve, interacting with the different stakeholders, and then coming back to the lab to advise the different project aspects so we could adapt. We did not simply make conclusions on the stakeholders’ needs through researching secondary sources, but actually went out and spoke to different stakeholders personally.