Difference between revisions of "Team:LMU-TUM Munich/Proof"
(→creating the perfect "sausage") |
(→Creating the perfect "sausage") |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
In order to characterize our cells concerning their biotin binding capabilities by taking a look at their polymerization behaviour after adding them to a medium, which is rich of biotinylated protein linkers. | In order to characterize our cells concerning their biotin binding capabilities by taking a look at their polymerization behaviour after adding them to a medium, which is rich of biotinylated protein linkers. | ||
| − | Since the expression of the two biotin binding receptor constructs was significantly higher than the expression of the biotin presenting one we mainly used one of the biotin binding constructs, the scAvidin version. | + | Since the expression of the two biotin binding receptor constructs was significantly higher than the expression of the biotin presenting one, we mainly used one of the biotin binding constructs, the scAvidin version. |
| − | The main idea behind the polymerization experiments was that we find the perfect conditions for | + | The main idea behind the polymerization experiments was that we wanted to find the perfect conditions for the cells to stick together, concerning the right medium, concentration and biotinylation degree of the protein linker. |
| − | + | ||
| + | The main components of all our polymerization experiments were svAvidin-construct-transfected Trex cells, biotinylated bovine serum albumine and streptavidin (or streptactin). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Our first experiments were not conducted with our printer, but under a fluorescence microscope for better analysability of the produced polymer. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The tests showed that the polymerization effect is only dependent on three things: | ||
| + | * amount of cells/mL in the ink | ||
| + | * concentration of BSA in the ink | ||
| + | * concentration of Streptavidin inside the printing medium | ||
| + | |||
| + | Since the addition or removal of biotinylated eGFP from the ink did not show a significant effect on then polymerization it was added to every sample for better visualization. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Experiments showed that the concentration of biotinylated BSa in our biotINK is the limiting factor for polymerization. The Higher the concentration of BSA was, the more structural integrity of the "printed" polymer could be oberved. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Negativ | ||
| + | |||
| + | After the | ||
== In the Micromanipulator == | == In the Micromanipulator == | ||
Revision as of 09:06, 19 October 2016
Wichtiger Kommentar: Polymerization wird Proof-of-Principle page.
Introduction to polymerization
Design: Why we chose the Avidin & Biotin affinity pair
- Vergleich mit anderen Polymerisationsmöglichkeiten die wir diskutiert hatten
- Tabelle mit Literaturwerten zu Assoziationsraten
| Affinity pair | Kind of interaction | Dissociation constant | Association rate | Comment |
| Avidin - Biotin | non covalent | 10-15M [1] | 55 440 | |
| SpyCatcher - SpyTag | covalent | not applicable | ||
| StrepTactin - Strep-tag II |
Multivalency and avidity as major principles for polymerization
- Strukturmodeling
Different polymers possible with biotINK polymerization
Since the foundation of our polymerization reaction is the interaction of Streptavidin and its binding partner Biotin (Referenz) we used biotinylated polymers to convery the polymerization between the cells.
- Mesh-Bilder von Luisa
Results: Polymerization experiments
Creating the perfect "sausage"
In order to characterize our cells concerning their biotin binding capabilities by taking a look at their polymerization behaviour after adding them to a medium, which is rich of biotinylated protein linkers.
Since the expression of the two biotin binding receptor constructs was significantly higher than the expression of the biotin presenting one, we mainly used one of the biotin binding constructs, the scAvidin version. The main idea behind the polymerization experiments was that we wanted to find the perfect conditions for the cells to stick together, concerning the right medium, concentration and biotinylation degree of the protein linker.
The main components of all our polymerization experiments were svAvidin-construct-transfected Trex cells, biotinylated bovine serum albumine and streptavidin (or streptactin).
Our first experiments were not conducted with our printer, but under a fluorescence microscope for better analysability of the produced polymer.
The tests showed that the polymerization effect is only dependent on three things:
- amount of cells/mL in the ink
- concentration of BSA in the ink
- concentration of Streptavidin inside the printing medium
Since the addition or removal of biotinylated eGFP from the ink did not show a significant effect on then polymerization it was added to every sample for better visualization.
Experiments showed that the concentration of biotinylated BSa in our biotINK is the limiting factor for polymerization. The Higher the concentration of BSA was, the more structural integrity of the "printed" polymer could be oberved.
Negativ
After the
In the Micromanipulator
References
- ↑ Green, N. M. (1963). Avidin. 1. The use of [14C] biotin for kinetic studies and for assay. Biochemical Journal, 89(3), 585.
