Difference between revisions of "Team:DTU-Denmark/Safety"

(Undo revision 381576 by Saphi (talk))
Line 22: Line 22:
 
                 <div class="caption">
 
                 <div class="caption">
 
                     <div class="col-md-5 col-sm-5 col-xs-12 title"> <!-- the approximate max number of characters ~ 400 --> <!-- EDIT -->
 
                     <div class="col-md-5 col-sm-5 col-xs-12 title"> <!-- the approximate max number of characters ~ 400 --> <!-- EDIT -->
                         <h1>Safety<p class="lead">leader under the title, short introduction. Ubique moderatius efficiantur eum et, dico oporteat recusabo ius cu, pro id modus sadipscing. Maluisset patrioque eum ad, mel eius doctus accommodare eu, minimum deleniti repudiandae mel ea. Noster nostrud diceret sea no. Eos an nullam molestiae signiferumque, vel ne laudem ignota oblique. Duo te luptatum percipitur signiferumque, at dicunt iriure dolorem his.</p></h1>
+
                         <h1>Safety<p class="lead"></p></h1>
 
                     </div>
 
                     </div>
 
                     <div class="col-md-2 col-sm-2 hidden-xs space"></div>
 
                     <div class="col-md-2 col-sm-2 hidden-xs space"></div>
Line 51: Line 51:
 
             </blockquote>
 
             </blockquote>
 
              
 
              
<p>To minimize the risks while working on the iGEM project we choose the chassis organism Yarrowia lipolytica which is generally regarded as safe (GRAS) and non-pathogenic to humans. Aside from that we worked with the Escherichia coli DH5 alpha laboratory strain which does not pose a threat to healthy humans.  We also did some growth experiment with  Saccharomyces cerevisiae, another GRAS organism. </p>  
+
<p>To minimize the risks while working on the iGEM project we chooe the chassis organism Yarrowia lipolytica which is generally regarded as safe (GRAS) and non-pathogenic to humans. Aside from that we worked with the Escherichia coli DH5 alpha laboratory strain which does not pose a threat to healthy humans.  We also did some growth experiment with  Saccharomyces cerevisiae, another GRAS organism. </p>  
  
 
<p>In our choice of genetic material we considered the risks the origin organism could pose. We only used genes from safe sources such as Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous, Renilla reinformis and the human gene for pre-insulin codon optimised with our own codon-optimization tool for Y. lipolityca.</p>
 
<p>In our choice of genetic material we considered the risks the origin organism could pose. We only used genes from safe sources such as Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous, Renilla reinformis and the human gene for pre-insulin codon optimised with our own codon-optimization tool for Y. lipolityca.</p>
Line 62: Line 62:
 
         <div><a class="anchor" id="section-2"></a>
 
         <div><a class="anchor" id="section-2"></a>
 
         <h2 class="h2">Laboratory safety measures</h2>
 
         <h2 class="h2">Laboratory safety measures</h2>
           <p>All work with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) were performed in class 1 GMO laboratories following the required procedures. This include amongst others wearing laboratory coats, gloves and goggles, disinfecting surfaces, tools etc. with ethanol and autoclaving all vaste, used tools and discarded cultures. We used laf-benches whenever possible to avoid the fire hazard of gas flames when performing sterile work. The Hamilton robot used as fermentation platform was decontaminated before and after each use with UV light.</p>
+
           <p>All work with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) were performed in class 1 GMO laboratories following the required procedures. This include amongst others wearing laboratory coats, gloves and goggles, disinfecting surfaces, tools etc. with ethanol and autoclaving all waste, used tools and discarded cultures. We used laf-benches whenever possible to avoid the fire hazard of gas flames when performing sterile work. The Hamilton robot used as fermentation platform was decontaminated before and after each use with UV light.</p>
  
 
<p>In our work with hazardous substances we took extra safety measures and worked with utmost caution. We used laf-benches and powerful suction in the experiments performed with 2-Mercaptoethanol (BME). SYBR-Safe was always handled with gloves and caution. Containers with liquid nitrogen were only opened and cooling conducted in well ventilated rooms.  
 
<p>In our work with hazardous substances we took extra safety measures and worked with utmost caution. We used laf-benches and powerful suction in the experiments performed with 2-Mercaptoethanol (BME). SYBR-Safe was always handled with gloves and caution. Containers with liquid nitrogen were only opened and cooling conducted in well ventilated rooms.  

Revision as of 17:40, 19 October 2016

New HTML template for the wiki




Bootstrap Example

Safety


Precautionary work

Safety is something that happens between your ears, not something you hold in your hands

Jeff Cooper

To minimize the risks while working on the iGEM project we chooe the chassis organism Yarrowia lipolytica which is generally regarded as safe (GRAS) and non-pathogenic to humans. Aside from that we worked with the Escherichia coli DH5 alpha laboratory strain which does not pose a threat to healthy humans. We also did some growth experiment with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, another GRAS organism.

In our choice of genetic material we considered the risks the origin organism could pose. We only used genes from safe sources such as Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous, Renilla reinformis and the human gene for pre-insulin codon optimised with our own codon-optimization tool for Y. lipolityca.

Laboratory safety measures

All work with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) were performed in class 1 GMO laboratories following the required procedures. This include amongst others wearing laboratory coats, gloves and goggles, disinfecting surfaces, tools etc. with ethanol and autoclaving all waste, used tools and discarded cultures. We used laf-benches whenever possible to avoid the fire hazard of gas flames when performing sterile work. The Hamilton robot used as fermentation platform was decontaminated before and after each use with UV light.

In our work with hazardous substances we took extra safety measures and worked with utmost caution. We used laf-benches and powerful suction in the experiments performed with 2-Mercaptoethanol (BME). SYBR-Safe was always handled with gloves and caution. Containers with liquid nitrogen were only opened and cooling conducted in well ventilated rooms.

  • FIND US AT:
Facebook Twitter
  • DTU BIOBUILDERS
  • DENMARK
  • DTU - SØLTOFTS PLADS, BYGN. 221/002
  • 2800 KGS. LYNGBY

  • E-mail:
  • dtu-biobuilders-2016@googlegroups.com
  • MAIN SPONSORS:
Lundbeck fundation DTU blue dot Lundbeck fundation Lundbeck fundation