Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
} | } | ||
− | #bodyContent h1.main-title { | + | #bodyContent div.front-page h1.main-title { |
font-size: 50px; | font-size: 50px; | ||
text-align: center; | text-align: center; | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
@media only screen and (max-width: 700px){ | @media only screen and (max-width: 700px){ | ||
− | #bodyContent h1.main-title { | + | #bodyContent div.front-page h1.main-title { |
font-size: 36px; | font-size: 36px; | ||
} | } | ||
− | .p { | + | div.front-page .p { |
font-weight: 200; | font-weight: 200; | ||
font-size: 12px !important; | font-size: 12px !important; | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
<body class="container-fluid"> | <body class="container-fluid"> | ||
− | <div class="container"> | + | <div class="container front-page"> |
<h1 class="main-title">YEASTILIZATION</h1> | <h1 class="main-title">YEASTILIZATION</h1> | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
<div class="hovereffect" onclick="void(0)"> | <div class="hovereffect" onclick="void(0)"> | ||
<img class="img-responsive" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/13/T--DTU-Denmark--graininflask_sq.jpg"> | <img class="img-responsive" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/13/T--DTU-Denmark--graininflask_sq.jpg"> | ||
+ | |||
<div class="overlay"> | <div class="overlay"> | ||
<h2>The <strong>problem</strong></h2> | <h2>The <strong>problem</strong></h2> | ||
− | <p><strong> | + | <p><strong> |
− | The current state of industrial biotechnology means that the vast majority biorefineries rely on edible substrates such as corn, wheat or sugar canes. This has sparked the food vs. fuel debate, leading to the fundamental question: “Should we use our edible crops to feed the growing human population, or use it to provide sustainable chemicals for the industrialised world?”. A better question might be: “Why are we not doing both?”. The limiting factor of the current processes, is a lack of molecular tools that has limited us to the use of a small number of organisms with narrow substrate ranges. Even though efforts have been made to expand the substrate range of many conventional cell factories, such as Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the task has proven difficult and we have yet to see real impact from these efforts. | + | The current state of industrial biotechnology means that the vast majority biorefineries rely on edible substrates such as corn, wheat or sugar canes. This has sparked the food vs. fuel debate, leading to the fundamental question: “Should we use our edible crops to feed the growing human population, or use it to provide sustainable chemicals for the industrialised world?”. A better question might be: “Why are we not doing both?”. The limiting factor of the current processes, is a lack of molecular tools that has limited us to the use of a small number of organisms with narrow substrate ranges. Even though efforts have been made to expand the substrate range of many conventional cell factories, such as Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the task has proven difficult and we have yet to see real impact from these efforts. |
− | </strong></p> | + | </strong></p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 61: | Line 62: | ||
<p><strong> | <p><strong> | ||
− | + | The development of new technologies such as CRISPR and Next-generation sequencing has dramatically reduced the effort required to genetically modify non-model organisms, and is effectively breaking down the barrier between model and non-model organism. Therefore we though: “Why force a model organisms to grow on non-conventional substrates, when we can start of with an organism that already grows on a broad range of substrates?”. See our proposed solution by scrolling down. | |
</strong></p> | </strong></p> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 12:53, 19 October 2016