KBFalkenberg (Talk | contribs) |
KBFalkenberg (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 219: | Line 219: | ||
<li><a href="http://www.idf.org/sites/default/files/IDF_AnnualReport_2015_WEB.pdf">IDF annual report 2015</li> | <li><a href="http://www.idf.org/sites/default/files/IDF_AnnualReport_2015_WEB.pdf">IDF annual report 2015</li> | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> <!-- /LEFT --> | </div> <!-- /LEFT --> |
Revision as of 17:25, 19 October 2016
Products
In the Molecular tools section we developed several molecular tools, potentially allowing us to genetically engineer Y. lipolytica. In this section we apply these tools and attempt to use these to achieve expression in Y. lipoltyca.
Introduction
“Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focus efforts” 3
Paul J. Meyer It's your life. Live big.<
By developing tools to genetically engineer Yarrowia lipolytica we aim to create a versatile cell factory, which in the future will be able to produce almost any desired product ranging from complex therapeutic proteins to high value chemical compounds. Besides diversity of products cell factory based on Yarrowia lipolytica offers a wide range of substrate tolerance.
We aim to demonstrate this versatility of our Y. lipolytica strain as a cell factory by producing heterologous proteins. Our first attempt is the production of hrGFP, followed by proinsulin. To achieve both of mentioned ideas we apply the pSB1A8YL plasmid, cloning workflow and codon optimization algorithm developed by our team.
hrGFP
Design
In order to test if we were able to clone a of a construct in E. coli pSB1A8YL, which would be expressed, and ultimately prove that we were able to express genes in Y. lipolytica, we chose to develop our own BioBricks. Namely a constitutive transcription factor alpha (TEF1) promoter native to Y. lipolytica (BBa_K2117000) and the hrGFP gene (BBa_K2117003) previously used successfully in Y. lipolytica1. The hrGFP sequence was codon optimized by the algorithm developed by our team. By combining these two parts in a device (BBa_K2117005) the expression should, in theory, be easily detected due to the fluorescence signal produced. The cloning flow can be seen in Figure 1.
![DESCRIPTION](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/thumb/f/f8/T--DTU-Denmark--Cloning_flow2.png/800px-T--DTU-Denmark--Cloning_flow2.png)
Results
The parts were ordered as gBlocks and assembled in E. coli using A3 assembly. The assembly was confirmed using restriction analysis (See Figure 2), PCR and sequencing (data not shown).
![DESCRIPTION](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/60/T--DTU-Denmark--GFP_Tef%2BhrGFP_all.png)
![DESCRIPTION](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/40/T--DTU-Denmark--GFP_control.png)
Insulin
Our experiments told us that our plasmid was a powerful tool, allowing us to conveniently assembling constructs in E. coli, which would be expressed in Y. lipolytica. Now we wanted to use it to take on the ultimate challange: Could we use this tool to produce proinsulin, and potentially increase the sustainability of insulin production?Theory
Insulin is a peptrode hormone synthesised in the pacreas, and plays a crucial role in glucose homeostasis and prevents harmful levels of sugar in the blood. Beta-cells in the islets of the pancreas release insulin to the blood stream, which stimulates muscle fat and liver cells to absorb and store glucose from the bloodstream by interacting with insulin-specific receptors2. Diabetes is caused by either immune-mediated destruction of pacreatic islet cells (type 1 diabetes), or pancreatic exhaustion causing insulin resistance (type 2 diabetes). Both types of diabetes is cured by artificially controlling the insulin concentration in the patient by injection3. The treatment of diabetes with insulin was discovered in 1921, and its ability to restore health is so dramatic, that it was initially described in terms such as "the raising of the dead". Considering this it perhaps does not come as a surprise that insulin is often descirbed as one of the most important biomedical events of the last century4, and as the number of adults with diabetes is expected to rise from 415 million today to 642 million in 2040, the relevance of diabetes is higher than ever6. To read more about the insulin market, see our descriptions page.
Insulin biosynthesis
At the first stage insulin is synthesized as a chain of 101 amino acids, called preproinsulin with a molecular weight of 12 Kilo daltons (kDa), which comprises of signal peptide (pre-peptide) and three short chains: A, B and C. The pre-peptide, responsible for directing a nascent polypeptide, is removed from preproinsulin giving the proinsulin consisting of 86 amino acids with a molecular weight of 9.4kDa. Subsequently, the proinsulin is folded and two disulphide bonds are created between chain A and B and one links chain A. In the last step, the C chain is digested from the proinsulin by an exoprotease - carboxypeptidase E. The mature insulin contains chains A and B linked by 3 disulphide bonds and in total comprises of 51 amino acids with a molecular weight of 5.8kDa5.
FIGURE OF INSULIN CHAINS AND CLEAVING
The first insulin was extracted from animals, and E. coli was emplyoed in the production of the A and B chain separately as recombinant DNA technologies progessed. Today insulin is produced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a single chain nonnative "miniproinsulin" precursor, which is matured by trypsin and carboxypeptidase B4.Goal
In order to demonstrate Yarrowia lipolytica as a versatile cell factory we aim to produce proinsulin as an answer to increasing global demand for insulin.
Results
The human proinsulin sequence was obtain from Sures et al. (1980). The sequence was codon optimized for the codon bias of Y. lipolytica using the codon optimization tool developed by our team, and ordered as a gBlock. The proinsulin gene with the RFC10 prefix and suffix was amplified by PCR into our BioBrick BBa_K2117003 and assembled with our TEF1 promoter to form our device BBa_K2117002. This was done in pSB1A8YL using standard A3 assembly. The construct was transformed into E. coli, purified and confirmed using analytical digenstion, PCR and sequencing (data not shown). After confirmation of the construct, it was transformed into Y. lipolytica. The transformants was subjected to colony PCR (see Figure 4). The cloning flow can be seen in Figure 5.
![DESCRIPTION](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/thumb/e/e0/T--DTU-Denmark--TEF%2BProins_restriction_analysis_png.png/800px-T--DTU-Denmark--TEF%2BProins_restriction_analysis_png.png)
![DESCRIPTION](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/thumb/d/de/T--DTU-Denmark--Cloning_flow3.png/800px-T--DTU-Denmark--Cloning_flow3.png)
We knew that detecting the proinsulin would be the biggest challange yet, as all previous detections was based on chromoproteins and fluorescence, while this was a protein without any intrinsic detectable signal. We had several considerations for detecting the proinsulin production including rtPCR and ELISA, altough ended up chosing SDS page and Western blotting, as these methods provide excellent sensitivity while some of the experiences running the SDS page experiments could be transfered to the western blotting experiments. The results of these experiments are show in Figure 6 and 7.
![DESCRIPTION](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/thumb/9/9b/T--DTU-Denmark--Proins_SDS.png/800px-T--DTU-Denmark--Proins_SDS.png)
![DESCRIPTION](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/thumb/f/f5/T--DTU-Denmark--Proins_WB.jpg/716px-T--DTU-Denmark--Proins_WB.jpg)
Unfortunately, non of these results gave conclusive evidence for the presence of proinsulin in our samples. The lack of proinsulin on the SDS could be caused by the concentration of proinsulin being lower than the detection limit. The lack of signal in the western blotting results could be caused by our antibody not recognising the proinsulin produced due to incomplete folding, or sub-optimal treatment of the membrane. Of course there is also the possibility that our strain is not producing proinsulin, although due to the positive results using hrGFP we are confident that our expression system works. Other effects such as mRNA folding or rapid protein degradation may also be factors leading to us not being able to detect proinsulin in the samples. Future efforts could include a fusion of the proinsulin a reporter (such as GFP) or a purification tag (such as a His-tag) aiding the detection of proinsulin.
Conclusion
In this section we apply the tools made in the molecular toolbox section, for heterologous protein production in Y. lipolytica. This is done by combining two of our own BioBricks, a constitutive transcription factor alpha (TEF1) promoter native to Y. lipolytica (BBa_K2117000) and the hrGFP gene (BBa_K2117003) codon optimized by the algorithm developed by our team. By combining these two parts using A3 assembly and the cloning flow suggested in the molecular tools section, we created the device BBa_K2117005. By confirming the production of hrGFP, we were able to prove that heterologous protein production is possible when our tool pSB1A8YL. Even though efforts to translate this into proinsulin production failed, the modular nature of pSB1A8YL means that it has potential to become a powerful tool when using Y. lipolytica for research or indsutrial purposes.
References
- Blazeck, J., Liu, L., Redden, H., & Alper, H. (2011). Tuning Gene Expression in Yarrowia lipolytica by a Hybrid Promoter Approach. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77(22), 7905–7914. doi:10.1128/AEM.05763-11
- NIDDK
- Zaykov, A. N., Mayer, J. P., & DiMarchi, R. D. (2016). Pursuit of a perfect insulin. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 15(6), 425–439. JOUR. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2015.36
- Mayer, J. P., Zhang, F., & DiMarchi, R. D. (2007). Insulin structure and function. Biopolymers, 88(5), 687–713. doi:10.1002/bip.20734
- Baeshen, Nabih A., et al. "Cell factories for insulin production." Microbial cell factories 13.1 (2014): 1.
- IDF annual report 2015