Difference between revisions of "Team:UCL/HP/Gold"
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<div class="highlight"> | <div class="highlight"> | ||
<h1> <u> Outreach activities </u> </h1> | <h1> <u> Outreach activities </u> </h1> | ||
| + | <h2> How did the input we received from that stakeholder interaction influence the direction of our project? </h2> | ||
| + | <p> As a result of that stakeholder interaction we realised that some of our preconceptions of the issue were wrong. We modified the language we used, we introduced BioBrick XXXX to our experimental plan and we updated out model to encompass YYY. When we fed this back to the stakeholder they approved.Something like that. Basically the human practices needs to be bi-directional in nature. </p> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class="column full_size" > | ||
| + | <div class="highlight"> | ||
| + | <h1> <u> Synbio showcase </u> </h1> | ||
<h2> How did the input we received from that stakeholder interaction influence the direction of our project? </h2> | <h2> How did the input we received from that stakeholder interaction influence the direction of our project? </h2> | ||
<p> As a result of that stakeholder interaction we realised that some of our preconceptions of the issue were wrong. We modified the language we used, we introduced BioBrick XXXX to our experimental plan and we updated out model to encompass YYY. When we fed this back to the stakeholder they approved.Something like that. Basically the human practices needs to be bi-directional in nature. </p> | <p> As a result of that stakeholder interaction we realised that some of our preconceptions of the issue were wrong. We modified the language we used, we introduced BioBrick XXXX to our experimental plan and we updated out model to encompass YYY. When we fed this back to the stakeholder they approved.Something like that. Basically the human practices needs to be bi-directional in nature. </p> | ||
Revision as of 10:00, 31 August 2016
Survey
How did the input we received from that stakeholder interaction influence the direction of our project?
As a result of that stakeholder interaction we realised that some of our preconceptions of the issue were wrong. We modified the language we used, we introduced BioBrick XXXX to our experimental plan and we updated out model to encompass YYY. When we fed this back to the stakeholder they approved.Something like that. Basically the human practices needs to be bi-directional in nature.
As a result we:
- Blog + Vlog
- Designed an app
- Ran some workshops
Outreach activities
How did the input we received from that stakeholder interaction influence the direction of our project?
As a result of that stakeholder interaction we realised that some of our preconceptions of the issue were wrong. We modified the language we used, we introduced BioBrick XXXX to our experimental plan and we updated out model to encompass YYY. When we fed this back to the stakeholder they approved.Something like that. Basically the human practices needs to be bi-directional in nature.
Synbio showcase
How did the input we received from that stakeholder interaction influence the direction of our project?
As a result of that stakeholder interaction we realised that some of our preconceptions of the issue were wrong. We modified the language we used, we introduced BioBrick XXXX to our experimental plan and we updated out model to encompass YYY. When we fed this back to the stakeholder they approved.Something like that. Basically the human practices needs to be bi-directional in nature.
Talked to researchers currently in the field of ageing
How did the input we received from that stakeholder interaction influence the direction of our project?
As a result of that stakeholder interaction we realised that some of our preconceptions of the issue were wrong. We modified the language we used, we introduced BioBrick XXXX to our experimental plan and we updated out model to encompass YYY. When we fed this back to the stakeholder they approved.Something like that. Basically the human practices needs to be bi-directional in nature.
Politicians
How did the input we received from that stakeholder interaction influence the direction of our project?
As a result of that stakeholder interaction we realised that some of our preconceptions of the issue were wrong. We modified the language we used, we introduced BioBrick XXXX to our experimental plan and we updated out model to encompass YYY. When we fed this back to the stakeholder they approved.Something like that. Basically the human practices needs to be bi-directional in nature.
Talking to the general public
How did the input we received from that stakeholder interaction influence the direction of our project?
As a result of that stakeholder interaction we realised that some of our preconceptions of the issue were wrong. We modified the language we used, we introduced BioBrick XXXX to our experimental plan and we updated out model to encompass YYY. When we fed this back to the stakeholder they approved.Something like that. Basically the human practices needs to be bi-directional in nature.
Ageing and art
How did the input we received from that stakeholder interaction influence the direction of our project?
As a result of that stakeholder interaction we realised that some of our preconceptions of the issue were wrong. We modified the language we used, we introduced BioBrick XXXX to our experimental plan and we updated out model to encompass YYY. When we fed this back to the stakeholder they approved.Something like that. Basically the human practices needs to be bi-directional in nature.
Industry
How did the input we received from that stakeholder interaction influence the direction of our project?
As a result of that stakeholder interaction we realised that some of our preconceptions of the issue were wrong. We modified the language we used, we introduced BioBrick XXXX to our experimental plan and we updated out model to encompass YYY. When we fed this back to the stakeholder they approved.Something like that. Basically the human practices needs to be bi-directional in nature.
★ ALERT!
This page is used by the judges to evaluate your team for the human practices gold medal criterion.
Delete this box in order to be evaluated for this medal. See more information at Instructions for Pages for awards.
Expand on your silver medal activity by demonstrating how you have integrated the investigated issues into the design and/or execution of your project.
iGEM teams are unique and leading the field because they "go beyond the lab" to imagine their projects in a social/environmental context, to better understand issues that might influence the design and use of their technologies.
Teams work with students and advisors from the humanities and social sciences to explore topics concerning ethical, legal, social, economic, safety or security issues related to their work. Consideration of these Human Practices is crucial for building safe and sustainable projects that serve the public interest.
For more information, please see the Human Practices Hub.
