Difference between revisions of "Judging"
m |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| − | + | <!-- | |
<div class="twoColumns "> | <div class="twoColumns "> | ||
<div class="full_border"> | <div class="full_border"> | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | + | --> | |
Revision as of 19:13, 27 May 2016
Welcome to judging in iGEM 2016! If you’re new to iGEM, you’re probably trying to make sense of our requirements, medal criteria, part submission guidelines and other facets of iGEM so that you can present a great project at the Giant Jamboree.
We made many changes to judging in 2015, so for the 2016 season we are focusing on consolidation. We don't intend to make too many changes to how the judging functions, only to take the best of judging and make it even better!
Information for Judges
Judging Handbook
Learn more how teams are evaluated in the 2015 judging handbook:
2015 Judging Handbook
Judging during iGEM focuses on evaluating team projects and presentations, while providing constructive and positive feedback to the teams. It is an integral part of iGEM's success and we hope you consider joining our voluntary judging team!
