Difference between revisions of "Team:CLSB-UK/Results"

In the Lab

At the end of the day, an iGEM team’s project is made or broken in the lab. And at CLSB, if you were to walk along the science corridor to the small, unassuming lab that is Mr Zivanic’s, in the months leading up to Jamboree, be it before school or after, during term time or while the students are meant to be off school, you would undoubtedly find it bustling with activity. For this is where the iGEM team made our home over the last year. This is where we developed from a team that marvelled at the accuracy of our micropipettes and struggled to put on microbiology lab coats to one that routinely performed gel extractions with ease, and confidently recorded the growth rate of our cyanobacteria. We came from humble beginnings, but by soldiering on past cells that demanded -80ºC freezers and ligations that refused to yield any results for three weeks in a row, by coming in at the crack of dawn and leaving after the sun had long since set, by sacrificing our well earned summer rest while our friends went off on holiday, we have achieved more than we could ever have hoped for.

Results

Making the parts needed

Achievements

We have made three parts, BBa_K2078000, BBa_K2078001 and BBa_K2078002, using the cloning strategies described on the strategy pages.

We used standard assembly method using restriction digestions and ligations.

We have shown that using the consensus promoter sequence slows down the expression of genes following it and that this affects the growth rate of E.coli. However, as the purple colour indicates amilCP is being expressed which means that the promoter-ORF construct works.

Figure 1.5 constructs after transformation. Growth of colonies indicates successful transformations. Plates that contained transformations with vector only (no insert) had no growth.

Figure 2.J23119_K592025_24hours. This shows purple pellet indicating the production of amilCP, which means that the construct is successful.

What we have learnt

Doing minipreps around construction crews that set of fire alarms makes them fail. These have to be carried out in continuity.

Using DNA stains from National Centre for Biotechnology Education kits for High Schools is unadvisable. Whilst they are meant to be sensitive enough for the plasmid concentrations that we were getting, the need for long staining and destaining which results in the DNA diffusing through the gel make this impractical. SybrSafe and a Blue translumination box are necessary if gel extraction is a part of the protocol.

Figure 3.Gel showing faint bands from minipreps, but demonstrating the lack of sensitivity of the DNA stain we were using.

Need to check all the parts before starting the cloning. We were aiming to make five parts, two of which would contain large porins and riboflavin synthesis genes. We got quite farith the strategy and have cloned these parts, but we failed to find a suitable RBS for them that would work in cyanobacteria and had to abandon this line of work.

Transforming Synechocystis PCC6803

Achievements

We have managed to create the pDF-lac plasmid containing the two constructs we wanted to test (BBa_K2078001 and BBa_K2078002). We transformed E.coli with these and amplified them. We extracted them using minipreps. The concentration of the plasmid in minipreps was very low (about 50ng/ul), but this is expected as it is a low copy plasmid.

Figure 4.Plates with streptomycin/ spectinomycin showing growth of E.coli transformed with pDF-lac plasmids.

Following natural transformations of Synechocystis PCC6803 and the initial bleaching stage, there was some growth of transformed colonies (image bellow). The growth was very slowly, indicating that the plasmid was indeed a low copy plasmid, and that the expression of all the genes from this plasmid might have slowed down the overal growth.

Figure 5.Plates with streptomycin/ spectinomycin showing growth of Synechocystis PCC6803 transformed with pDF-lac plasmids.

What we have learnt

Synechocystis PCC6803 grows really slowly. This makes transformations of it very difficult, particularly for a project with a time limit.

Plasmids available for introduction into cyanobacteria are rare and the ones that are BioBrick compatible are almost impossible to track down. Non-BioBrick compatible ones are difficult to clone into as pDF-lac plasmid tends to fail when using two restriction enzymes (several tries were needed to get the right digests) and using blunt end cloning would require additional steps to identify the right transformant. pDF-lac plasmid is also a low copy plasmid making transformations even slower than usual.

Measuring Synechocystis PCC6803 growth

Achievements

We measured the growth by setting up a starter culture in liquid BG-11 medium and taking samples every day and measuring their absorbance using a colorimeter. We did this using different filters, in order to establish which filter was the most useful. We opted for 680nm filter in the end.

Figure 6.Growth curves of Synechocystis PCC6803 untransformed and transformed with the pDF plasmid containing the cmpA gene.

What we have learnt

That using dilution plating doesn't work for this organism. We tried this approach for a weak and realised that we don't get individual colonies developing on any of the plates and that the growth rate of Synechocystis PCC6803 is too low to be noticeable in time to record any meaningful results.

Optimising the fuel cell

Achievements

We investigated the effect of differing amounts of time exposed to light in solar cell conversion of light into electricity. We measured the voltage across 4 different solar cells. Two were kept in light overnight and the other two were kept in darkness. After being kept in their relevant conditions throughout the night, the solar cells were then kept in the dark for 10 minutes before we put them into fuel cells. Then, the two solar cells that had been exposed to light (Light 1 & 2) and one of the solar cells that was kept in darkness (Dark 1) were exposed to light (lamps set up either side of the cells) whilst the voltage (mV at Lux: 790) was being recorded. This was done using a voltmeter with connecting wires on the electrodes of the fuel cells. We recorded the voltage at 10-second intervals for just over ten minutes (620 seconds). Therefore, we were able to measure the potential difference against the amount of time following the solar cells’ exposure to light.

The solar cell we used as a control showed a decrease in voltage over the 620 seconds starting at 80mV and finishing at 68mV. Light 1 (starting at 266 mV) showed a very slight increase in voltage before decreasing by a small amount to 253mV. Light 2 only increased in voltage from 224 mV to 250 mV. Dark 1 showed the biggest increase in voltage (146mV to 258mV), which is why we decided to pursue this line of investigation when testing our transformed Synechocystis PCC6803.