Difference between revisions of "Team:British Columbia/Human Practices"
m |
m |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
@media(max-width:767px) { | @media(max-width:767px) { | ||
.sidebar-nav { | .sidebar-nav { | ||
| − | text-align: | + | text-align: center; |
position: static; | position: static; | ||
top: 0; | top: 0; | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
text-align: right; | text-align: right; | ||
} | } | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | |||
| + | .nav-pills > li.active > a, | ||
| + | .nav-pills > li.active > a:hover, | ||
| + | .nav-pills > li.active > a:focus { | ||
| + | background-color: #00cc14; | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | |||
| + | .nav-pills a { | ||
| + | color: black; | ||
} | } | ||
| Line 53: | Line 63: | ||
} | } | ||
}); | }); | ||
| − | |||
/*set appropriate width on page load */ | /*set appropriate width on page load */ | ||
| Line 61: | Line 70: | ||
$('.sidebar-nav').css('width', 'auto'); | $('.sidebar-nav').css('width', 'auto'); | ||
} | } | ||
| + | |||
| + | }); | ||
| + | |||
/* adjust width on resize */ | /* adjust width on resize */ | ||
$(window).resize(function() { | $(window).resize(function() { | ||
Revision as of 01:44, 15 October 2016
Human Practices
Who we are
The UBC iGEM team is composed of ten undergraduate students under the guidance of six graduate and two faculty advisors. We are pleased to be composed of students from over eight disciplines and multiple years of study. This year we are fortunate to be based out of the Murphy and Hallam Labs located in UBC’s Life Science Center to conduct our wet lab research. Our summer goal was to build off the findings of the Smit Lab (also located at UBC) to develop a new enzyme display system with the application for biomass decomposition.
Background
Emerging scientists everywhere are taught in jargon that requires the structure of post-secondary education to understand and decipher the complex topics that arise regularly in every science field ranging from micro-processors to planetary science. Given this, there is no surprise there exists a large gap between the science community and the general public with the passage of information from primary research to that which a person would see on the news or in a magazine. Given this explanatory divide, we set about discovering what has worked in the scientific community in the past and who is currently having the most success in conveying scientific information.
