Difference between revisions of "Team:Peshawar/HP/Silver"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<head> | <head> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
<script type="text/javascript"> | <script type="text/javascript"> | ||
(function (){ var aa="\n//# sourceURL=",ba='<script type="text/javascript" src="',b="American Samoa",ca="Antigua and Barbuda",k="Bolivia",p="Bosna i Hercegovina",q="Botswana",da="British Virgin Islands",ea="Cayman Islands",fa="Christmas Island",ga="Falkland Islands",r="Ghana",ha="Guin\u00e9e \u00e9quatoriale",ia="Guyane fran\u00e7aise",t="Honduras",u="Indonesia",v="Itoophiyaa",ja="Kalaallit Nunaat",w="Kiribati",ka="LocaleNameConstants",la="Luxembourg",ma="Madagascar",na="Marshall Islands",x="Micronesia",oa="Moldova, Republica", | (function (){ var aa="\n//# sourceURL=",ba='<script type="text/javascript" src="',b="American Samoa",ca="Antigua and Barbuda",k="Bolivia",p="Bosna i Hercegovina",q="Botswana",da="British Virgin Islands",ea="Cayman Islands",fa="Christmas Island",ga="Falkland Islands",r="Ghana",ha="Guin\u00e9e \u00e9quatoriale",ia="Guyane fran\u00e7aise",t="Honduras",u="Indonesia",v="Itoophiyaa",ja="Kalaallit Nunaat",w="Kiribati",ka="LocaleNameConstants",la="Luxembourg",ma="Madagascar",na="Marshall Islands",x="Micronesia",oa="Moldova, Republica", | ||
| Line 158: | Line 155: | ||
| − | </script></head> | + | </script> |
| + | <link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/f5/T-Peshawar--favicon-v1-compressor.png"> | ||
| + | <title>iGEM Peshawar 2016</title> | ||
| + | <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://2016.igem.org/Template:Peshawar/CSS?action=raw&ctype=text/css" /> | ||
| + | </head> | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
Revision as of 17:12, 15 October 2016
Human Practices Silver
A total of 195 responders filled our survey. Majority of the responders were from Pakistan.
A large majority of participants seemed to be in favor of introduction and commercialization of Biotech and SynBio products at the state level.
Majority of responders understood that bacteria can be modified and/or directly used to make beneficial products!
A significant number of respondents (62%) were pro-SynBio products and knew quite a bit about terms like DNA, Genetic engineering, RNA and Proteins. They were well informed participants.
A small minority still believes that Genetic engineering is sinful. They only make up 19% of our smaple!
Public Awareness seems to be a divisive topic in general with no clear trends.
79% people would be comfortable with institutionalization of a bacterial strip test. Interestingly, 40% of these do not even own a motorized vehicle! SynBio receptability seems to be generally high!
In case of IP right conflict, 37% believes opined that the team that worked on a project should hold the most rights to it.
Reach Us
Institute of Integrative Biosciences,
CECOS University of IT & Emerging Sciences,
Phase 6, F-5, Hayatabad, Peshawar, Pakistan
iib@cecos.edu.pk
+92 91 5860291
Our Partners
