Difference between revisions of "Team:Technion Israel/Modifications/Intein"
| Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
<h2 class="">Introduction</h2> | <h2 class="">Introduction</h2> | ||
<p class="text-justify"> | <p class="text-justify"> | ||
| − | In our attempts to expand our system and | + | In our attempts to expand our system and design more receptors, we realized that our original approach will most likely work only |
by fusing the Tar chemoreceptor with other Ligand Binding Domains (LBD) from the bacterial world. <br> | by fusing the Tar chemoreceptor with other Ligand Binding Domains (LBD) from the bacterial world. <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 253: | Line 253: | ||
<p class="text-justify"> | <p class="text-justify"> | ||
Splicing is the name of the process in which an intein excises itself out of the flanking protein segments. | Splicing is the name of the process in which an intein excises itself out of the flanking protein segments. | ||
| − | This process can be conditioned to be activated by an outside | + | This process can be conditioned to be activated by an outside trigger such as a small molecule, light or even temperature <b>(7)</b> <br> |
To be compatible with our overall approach of changing ligand binding domains, we attempted to engineer a molecule controlled intein. By changing the | To be compatible with our overall approach of changing ligand binding domains, we attempted to engineer a molecule controlled intein. By changing the | ||
<a data-toggle="popover" data-trigger="click" data-original-title="Info:" data-html="true" | <a data-toggle="popover" data-trigger="click" data-original-title="Info:" data-html="true" | ||
| Line 259: | Line 259: | ||
LBD<i class="entypo-check"></i></button></a>, | LBD<i class="entypo-check"></i></button></a>, | ||
fused into the intein, it would become sensitive to different substances. | fused into the intein, it would become sensitive to different substances. | ||
| − | Inteins were successfully engineered in the past to be triggered by small molecules <b>(7)</b>, this was done by fusing a | + | Inteins were successfully engineered in the past to be triggered by small molecules <b>(7)</b>, this was done by fusing a ligand binding domain into the intein, |
that will induce splicing when it binds the target molecule. | that will induce splicing when it binds the target molecule. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Revision as of 20:21, 15 October 2016
Intein - Introduction
Introduction
In our attempts to expand our system and design more receptors, we realized that our original approach will most likely work only
by fusing the Tar chemoreceptor with other Ligand Binding Domains (LBD) from the bacterial world.
We decided to add a new approach that proved itself by LIANG et al (3). According to it, it would be possible to take receptors from other organisms and create a switching mechanism using an intein protein. As a proof of concept we tried the human estrogen receptor - hERɑ that binds estrogenic compounds.
The Inteins:
An intein is a protein element found as an in-frame insertion within the sequence of a particular host gene. It possesses the ability to excise itself post-translationally from its protein host, and ligate the flanking peptide sequences with a native peptide bond via a very efficient self-catalyzed reaction, called protein splicing.
Fig.1: Inteins, valuable genetic elements in molecular biology and biotechnology.
Conditional protein splicing:
Splicing is the name of the process in which an intein excises itself out of the flanking protein segments.
This process can be conditioned to be activated by an outside trigger such as a small molecule, light or even temperature (7)
To be compatible with our overall approach of changing ligand binding domains, we attempted to engineer a molecule controlled intein. By changing the
LBD,
fused into the intein, it would become sensitive to different substances.
Inteins were successfully engineered in the past to be triggered by small molecules (7), this was done by fusing a ligand binding domain into the intein,
that will induce splicing when it binds the target molecule.
Fig.2: Recent advances in in vivo applications of intein-mediated protein splicing.
Design and Implementation
Detection using chemotaxis and inteins:
One of the LBDs used with inteins is that of hERɑ - a human estrogen receptor, which was inserted into an intein and fused to lacZ as a proof of concept at (2,6).
We tried the same construct, the only difference being that we fused the intein into the Tar receptor in critical locations, which will render Tar inactive - “off mode”.
Upon contact with an estrogenic compound - the hERɑ-LBD will bind to it, and undergo a conformational change, which will induce intein splicing.
During the process the intein will ligate the Tar back to it’s native form and enable chemotaxis - “On mode”.
Figure 3:
a. Plasmid construct containing the intain gBlock in the Tar chemoreceptor.
b. General form of Tar chemoreceptor with and without the intein.
c. The overall switching strategy.
Our intein switch
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae VMA intein has been shown to retain its activities after being transferred into non native genes or cell hosts.
The VMA intein contains two regions:
1. Splicing region.
2. Endonuclease region.
The latter one is not essential for protein splicing.
At first, we found a registered part of intein with estrogen-LBD designed by Carnegie Mellon iGEM2014 team.
However, this part was not successful, thus we designed an original gBlock using the VMA intein in two steps:
1. Replace of the endonuclease region from the VMA intein (as written, not essential for splicing) with a cDNA coding for the LBD of the human estrogen receptor (8).
2. Deletion of four restriction sites (EcoRI, XbaI, SptI, PstI) by silent mutations (These enzymes exist in iGEM plasmid backbones pSB1C3).
Fig.4: Basic structure of our designed gBlock with Estrogen ligand binding domain, instead of the original endonuclease region of the intein.
Procedure
Generating two separate strains by inserting the intein-gBlock in two different locations in the Tar receptor,
following the requirements for efficient protein splicing:
- The first amino acid of the C-terminal extein should be a cysteine (Cys), serine (Ser), or threonine (Thr).
- The last amino acid of the N-terminal extein should be alanine (Ala) (1,3).
Fig.5: Demonstration of insertion of intein gBlock into Tar chemoreceptor, with the requirement for efficient protein splicing.
The aim was to insert the intein into the LBD region, rather than the cytoplasmic region, due to several reasons:
1. Prevent interruption of the signal peptide (the sequence responsible for signaling the cell to migrate the protein to the membrane), that is assumed to be in the C-terminus of the protein.
2. Avoid interruption of the transmembrane region.
Two regions in Tar-LBD have been found to answer the requirements, and for each we modeled the structure of Tar-intein complex, comparing to the native Tar chemoreceptor, using Phyre2 online modeling server (4):
Fig.6: a. Location 1 - between Ala101 and Cys102. b. Location 2 - between Ala118 and Cys119. c. Native Tar receptor
Challenges
This approach has never been done in any research, so we were heading into unknown territory.
There were a few major questions that needed to be answered:
1. Will Tar-intein chimera reach its proper location in the cell membrane?
2. What happens if the conformational change is happening while the chemoreceptor is in the membrane?
3. Will the intein splice out when it binds estrogen?
4. Will Tar fold correctly after intein splicing?
Few of these questions can be answered. First, clone Tar-intein chimera to
UU1250,
to generate strains
UTI1
and
UTI2.
In order to verify that Tar-intein chimera migrated to the proper location in the cell membrane -
GFP was fused to the C terminus of Tar, and the protein was tracked by using fluorescence microscope.
Native chemoreceptors are located on the poles of the cell membrane. (5).
To validate our switch mechanism - the new E.coli strain was incubated with 17-ꞵ-estradiol for 2 hours.
Afterwards chemotaxis assay (swarming assay) was performed with aspartate as attractant, to check whether
the strain has an active Tar, and is able to move.
Results
Intein-gBlock was failed to inserted into Tar via Gibson assembly. Only short part of the intein succeeded to be assemble. Since we assumed the intein might be too long (1575 bp) - new intein-gBlocks were generated, by splitting the original-intein-gBlock into two parts. An attempt to insert these two parts into Tar by Gibson assembly has failed as well. In our third and final attempt, different cloning method was used- blunt ligation. In this attempt, the original-intein-gBlock (one part) was used. This method did not work as well.
Outlook
Long fragment cloning is often challenging due to the fact that cloning efficiency is reduced with fragment size.
Using optimized cloning products might be essential.
As cloning methods did not work well, next stage is to assemble the two-parts of intein gBlocks via Gibson assembly,
in order to test whether it can be assembling to form the one intein segment. Following that, cloning intein segment
into Tar using blunt ligation method. Following that, perform estrogen-induction and swarming assay, to indicate
whether the intein indeed spliced out.
We believe this novel approach can be successful to construct new E.coli strains, contain Tar-switch according to various materials.
Except for one material detection - this approach can be used as an AND biological gate -
where we could verify if two specific materials are found in a sample.
1. CHONG, Shaorong; XU, Ming-Qun. Protein splicing of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae VMA intein without the endonuclease motifs. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1997, 272.25: 15587-15590.
2. ELLEUCHE, Skander; PÖGGELER, Stefanie. Inteins, valuable genetic elements in molecular biology and biotechnology. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2010, 87.2: 479-489.
3. LIANG, Rubing; ZHOU, Jing; LIU, Jianhua. Construction of a bacterial assay for estrogen detection based on an estrogen-sensitive intein. Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011, 77.7: 2488-2495.
4. Phyre2 modeling server online.
5. SHIOMI, Daisuke, et al. Helical distribution of the bacterial chemoreceptor via colocalization with the Sec protein translocation machinery. Molecular microbiology, 2006, 60.4: 894-906.
6. SKRETAS, Georgios; WOOD, David W. Regulation of protein activity with small‐molecule‐controlled inteins. Protein Science, 2005, 14.2: 523-532.
7. TOPILINA, Natalya I.; MILLS, Kenneth V. Recent advances in in vivo applications of intein-mediated protein splicing. Mobile Dna, 2014, 5.1: 1.
8. Uniprot
