G.M.Os (genetically modified organisms) are more and more present in our society due to the high yield they provide, being in the medical field, in pharmaceutics or in food industry. Though they are facing hard polemics, with the lack of knowledge on how the presence of G.M.Os in our close environment can impact our health. Indeed, several studies have shown both positive and negative influence of G.M.Os, and that can only contribute to the blur around such organisms and what we can accomplish with them.

In order to have a better idea of the perception of G.M.Os by the public in the context of the Quantifly project, the team developed an opinion survey about G.M.Os and their use in the air pollution issue. We fortunately had the opportunity to spread this survey to international citizens, thanks to the iGEM competition and the international convention organised by the iGEM IONIS team in Paris.

However, while being a general fear of G.M.Os (Figure 3), we cannot conclude that it is constructed on consistent information linked to those modified organisms. Indeed when asked how sufficient, accessible and trustable the information about G.M.Os was, the sample population estimated the information to be highly insufficient, inaccessible, and they seemed to estimate the few pieces of information untrustable (Figure 4).

This opinion survey was also aiming to evaluate the environment of our sample population. We established that most of it was living in a rather polluted area (Figure 5).

With such an environment, we tried to establish how much the population knows about air pollution and the methods of detection available to gather and analyse information about pollution (Figure 6). We also looked for their opinion of those detection means, in order to obtain more detailed information about the solution that Quantifly can bring on the market and thus determine its potential utility.

Our survey was dedicated to the opinion of our sample population about the use of G.M.Os in an indirect interaction with the environment, and how much the information provided could be trusted by the public.

The population shows an open mind in the sense that, while having shown fear in G.M.Os for their health, they trust that genetically modified organisms can be used in pollution detection. They however think that this usage must be done in a hermetic environment and/or confined medium in order to prevent potential contamination as shown in Figure 8.

However the sample population seems very prompt to the idea of a synthetic biology based tool to detect air pollution (Figure 9), and they are entrusting the use of such device by official pollution prevention organisms to be a good alternative to the existing methods that would not allow the same level of trust in the information.