Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
margin-top: 60px; | margin-top: 60px; | ||
font-weight: 200; | font-weight: 200; | ||
− | "><strong>July | + | "><strong>July 8th:</strong> our samples failed to be clear. |
</h2> | </h2> | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
margin-top: 60px; | margin-top: 60px; | ||
font-weight: 200; | font-weight: 200; | ||
− | "><strong> July | + | "><strong> July 22nd:</strong> the sample was too heated again, and we did not obtained result. |
</h2> | </h2> | ||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
margin-top: 60px; | margin-top: 60px; | ||
font-weight: 200; | font-weight: 200; | ||
− | "><strong> August 5th:</strong> the expected samples could be clearly seen, the third | + | "><strong> August 5th:</strong> the expected samples could be clearly seen, the third tends to have two bands. |
</h2> | </h2> | ||
Revision as of 02:51, 17 October 2016
After carrying out laboratory work, the way we used to check if our work was successful was through electrophoresis using agarose gel 0.8; 1.2 and 1.5 depending on its need.
Our laboratory work began in June this year and since then, we have been working.
Now, we will see our performance in Lux:
Results
July 8th: our samples failed to be clear.
July 22nd: Too heated, without result.
July 22nd: the sample was too heated again, and we did not obtained result.
July 23rd: performed in a small chamber gel 1.5, with Plux promoter, not able to see the two expected bands.
July 30th: No result was obtained from all samples, it will be repeated.
August 5th: the expected samples could be clearly seen, the third tends to have two bands.
August 10th: plasmids concentrates, all the samples were completely able to be seen, getting the expected result.
August 12th: we turned to repeat samples to make sure everything is correct, then the plasmids were sent to cryogenics.