Difference between revisions of "Team:Sheffield/episode5"

Line 289: Line 289:
 
</th>
 
</th>
 
<th>
 
<th>
<div class="heading-title"><h1 style="padding:0px">HOSPITALS</h1></div>
+
<div class="heading-title"><h1 style="padding:0px">REFLECTING UPON OUR WORK</h1></div>
 
</th>
 
</th>
 
<th class="banner-img">
 
<th class="banner-img">

Revision as of 16:49, 17 October 2016

A template page

REFLECTING UPON OUR WORK

What we failed to do and what we should have done

Our work in human practices is limited to the extent that for each stakeholder that we have only got in tocuh one individual. This size of sample is far from representative. If future iGEM teams would like to build on our work, for example, more than one doctor and patient should be contacted.

In terms of studying how our device would impact the world, we did not speak to the the NHS(National health service) or any private health provider such as Bupa. This means we are unable to forecast how the device would seem if it were to be introduced to the market.

Finally, due to time constraint, we also failed to have a ready device for our experts or users such as patients to test it, making us lack of device re-specifications