Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
<x-ref>Woolfson2005, Gradisar2011, Negron2014</x-ref> | <x-ref>Woolfson2005, Gradisar2011, Negron2014</x-ref> | ||
, thereby CCs offers a flexible and | , thereby CCs offers a flexible and | ||
− | versatile platform in terms of designing logic operation in vivo. With the purpose of | + | versatile platform in terms of designing logic operation <i>in vivo</i>. With the purpose of |
understanding the relation that underlies the interaction between coiled coil peptides and | understanding the relation that underlies the interaction between coiled coil peptides and | ||
therefore using them in logic gates, we designed the following model ( | therefore using them in logic gates, we designed the following model ( | ||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
context of <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Protease_signaling/Logic">logic | context of <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Protease_signaling/Logic">logic | ||
function | function | ||
− | design</a>. Two orthogonal CC segment, A and b, fused together in on chain can bind each | + | design</a>. Two orthogonal CC segment, <b>A</b> and <b>b</b>, fused together in on chain can bind each |
− | other and form a stable CC pair. This complex exists in combination with the peptide B, | + | other and form a stable CC pair. This complex exists in combination with the peptide <b>B</b>, |
which | which | ||
− | can also bind the peptide A and has a different affinity from the peptide b. The linker that | + | can also bind the peptide <b>A</b> and has a different affinity from the peptide <b>b</b>. The linker that |
− | connects A and b can be cleaved by a generic protease (e.g. TEV), this irreversible reaction | + | connects <b>A</b> and <b>b</b> can be cleaved by a generic protease (e.g. TEV), this irreversible reaction |
shift the equilibrium towards a state in which all of the three peptides are free in | shift the equilibrium towards a state in which all of the three peptides are free in | ||
solution | solution | ||
and therefore compete for binding. In our experiments, a similar system as the generic coils | and therefore compete for binding. In our experiments, a similar system as the generic coils | ||
− | + | <b>A</b> | |
− | and B was fused to the <a | + | and <b>B</b> was fused to the <a |
href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Protease_signaling/Reporters">split | href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Protease_signaling/Reporters">split | ||
reporter | reporter | ||
Line 201: | Line 201: | ||
affinity, only once is cleaved off its partner ($ Kd_B \lt Kd_b $). In doing so we selected | affinity, only once is cleaved off its partner ($ Kd_B \lt Kd_b $). In doing so we selected | ||
P3 as | P3 as | ||
− | B and | + | <b>B</b> and |
− | P3mS as b, these two coiled coil peptides present only few substitutions and the higher | + | P3mS as <b>b</b>, these two coiled coil peptides present only few substitutions and the higher |
− | solubility of P3mS (b), which presents Gln and Ser instead of Ala in b and c position of the | + | solubility of P3mS (<b>b</b>), which presents Gln and Ser instead of Ala in <i>b</i> and <i>c</i> position of the |
heptads, would favour the dissociation. We also tried differently destabilized versions of | heptads, would favour the dissociation. We also tried differently destabilized versions of | ||
P3 | P3 |
Revision as of 10:01, 18 October 2016
Coiled Coil interaction model
Logic operations in biological systems have been tested with several approaches
The relationship between the signal before and after cleavage by proteases is represented by the difference [AB] - [AB-b]. In order to understand the optimal combination of dissociation constant required to obtain a good signal we solved two systems of equations set up considering the two state of the reaction scheme, Before cleavage and After cleavage, (1) and (6) respectively, as separate phases of the reaction and additionally, considering cleavage as an irreversible and complete reaction.
Given values for total concentrations and Kd (from 10-9 to 10-3 M) the equations, for the reaction constants (2), (3) and (7), (8) and and for mass conservation (4), (5) and (9), (10), (11) were solved for the species at equilibrium.
Before cleavage \begin{equation} \ce{Axb + B <=>[Kd_x] A-b + B <=>[Kd_B] AB-b} \end{equation} \begin{align} Kd_x &= \frac{[A-b]}{[Axb]} \label{1.1-2}\\ Kd_B &= \frac{[A-b] * [B]}{[AB - b]} \\ c_B &= [B] + [AB-b]\\ c_A-b &= [A-b]+[Axb]+[AB-b] \label{2.1-2} \end{align} After cleavage \begin{equation} \ce{Ab + B <=>[Kd_b] A + b + B <=>[Kd_B] AB + b} \end{equation} \begin{align} Kd_b &= \frac{[A] * [b]}{[Ab]} \label{1.3-4}\\ Kd_B &= \frac{[A] * [B]}{[AB]} \\ c_A &= [A]+[AB]+[Ab]\\ c_B &= [B] +[AB]\\ c_b &= [b] + [Ab] \label{2.3-5} \end{align} The two systems are connected by the relation between the dissociation constants $Kd_b$ and $Kd_x$, \begin{equation} Kd_x = Kd_b * 4 * 10^{-3} M^{-1} \end{equation} This relation approximates the higher affinity between the coils A and b when they are covalently linked by a short peptide (as in the system “Before cleavage”)The results have been plotted varying the Kd for the interaction of A with both B and b, against the difference [AB] - [AB-b], where [AB] is considered the signal after cleavage and [AB-b] the signal before cleavage (leakage). The system revealed that in order to obtain a high difference between signal and leakage a high affinity of the coil B for the coil A (low $Kd_B$) is required, while on the other hand an excessive destabilization of the autoinhibitory coil b (high $Kd_b$) would prevent the signal to be visible ( 5.4.2. ).
This relationship suggested to try using a different version of the coiled coils available in
the
toolset already used by the Slovenian iGEM 2009
team