Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | <h5> | + | <h5> To test if we could reduce the supercoiling between these two genes, we proposed several different strategies that we felt may alleviate the problem. The first method we tried was adding random base pair sequences in between the two genes, with lengths of 500bp or 1000bp. We created this in the hope that the spacer in between the two genes would alleviate the tension that creates the supercoiling. Another one of our methods was to use a dCas9 clamp between the RFP and GFP to clamp down between the two genes and stop the supercoiling. |
+ | In order to see whether or not the problem of supercoiling was reduced, we had to first construct the plasmid circuits used for our experiment by using Golden Gate Assembly. First, we designed primers to amplify our parts off current iGEM parts using the online DNA design editor, Benchling (for parts designs: https://benchling.com/sclamons/f_/fBGWWXin-parts/?sort=name). For our experiment we have used RFP and GFP and parts from the iGEM inventory: BBa_J04450 (insert hyperlink on wiki: http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J04450) and BBa_I13522 (insert hyperlink on wiki: http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I13522), respectively. These parts were amplified off and ligated together in varying orientations (see picture designs) with a spacer part between them (either 500bp spacer, 1000bp spacer, or a dcas9 clamp site spacer) and finally a vector, or backbone piece, with Chloramphenicol or Kanamycin resistance. <h5> | ||
+ | |||
+ | #put pictures of Katie's plasmid designs!! | ||
+ | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
<center> | <center> |
Revision as of 23:34, 18 October 2016