Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>Three light inducible split proteases were designed and shown to rapidly | <li>Three light inducible split proteases were designed and shown to rapidly | ||
− | respond to | + | respond to regulation by blue light stimulation. |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</b></p> | </b></p> | ||
Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
activation of different biological processes. Small molecules and other chemical | activation of different biological processes. Small molecules and other chemical | ||
signals lack spatial resolution and their temporal resolution is limited by the time | signals lack spatial resolution and their temporal resolution is limited by the time | ||
− | required for cell permeation. In comparison, induction by light as developed by | + | required for the cell permeation. In comparison, induction by light as developed by |
− | optogenetics offers many advantages. It is fast as well as inexpensive and allows | + | the optogenetics offers many advantages. It is fast as well as inexpensive and allows |
for excellent spatial, temporal and dose-dependent control. | for excellent spatial, temporal and dose-dependent control. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
There is a plethora of various light inducible systems available; however, not | There is a plethora of various light inducible systems available; however, not | ||
− | many are applicable to our purpose. Red light induced systems like | + | many are applicable to our purpose. Red light induced systems like Phy/PIF |
require an | require an | ||
additional phytochrome | additional phytochrome | ||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
the system can only be induced once | the system can only be induced once | ||
<x-ref>Niopek2014</x-ref> | <x-ref>Niopek2014</x-ref> | ||
− | . | + | . As a consequence of this we selected for the purpose of our iGEM project |
− | Of these, | + | systems responsive to blue light. |
+ | Of these, FKF1/GIGANTEA displays slow association and dissociation rates | ||
<x-ref>Guntas2015</x-ref> | <x-ref>Guntas2015</x-ref> | ||
, making it impractical for fast response purposes, while VVD displays | , making it impractical for fast response purposes, while VVD displays | ||
Line 154: | Line 155: | ||
and in mammalian cells by <a | and in mammalian cells by <a | ||
href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Project/The_light_system">Freiburg_2014</a>. | href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Project/The_light_system">Freiburg_2014</a>. | ||
− | + | As LOV2 is a small photosensory domain from Avena sativa | |
phototropin 1 with a C-terminal Jα helix. The Jα helix is caged in darkness but unfolds | phototropin 1 with a C-terminal Jα helix. The Jα helix is caged in darkness but unfolds | ||
upon blue light (< 500 nm) photoexcitation, which is crucial for phototropin | upon blue light (< 500 nm) photoexcitation, which is crucial for phototropin | ||
− | + | signaling. | |
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 184: | Line 185: | ||
<h3 style="clear:both;"><span id="lov" class="section colorize"> </span>LOVpep and ePDZb | <h3 style="clear:both;"><span id="lov" class="section colorize"> </span>LOVpep and ePDZb | ||
</h3> | </h3> | ||
− | <p>For initial testing and characterization of the system, we fused LOVpep and ePDZb | + | <p>For initial testing and characterization of the system, we fused the LOVpep and ePDZb |
<x-ref>Muller2014</x-ref> | <x-ref>Muller2014</x-ref> | ||
to corresponding segments of the | to corresponding segments of the | ||
<a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Protease_signaling/Reporters#cle">split | <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Protease_signaling/Reporters#cle">split | ||
− | firefly luciferase</a> | + | firefly luciferase</a>. We tested different positions of the split protein on |
the PDZ domain, | the PDZ domain, | ||
while the split protein was kept at the N-terminus of the LOVpep domain due to the | while the split protein was kept at the N-terminus of the LOVpep domain due to the | ||
− | importance of the C-terminal peptide epitope | + | importance of the C-terminal peptide epitope ( |
+ | <ref>1</ref> | ||
+ | ). | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<div style="margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; width:70%"> | <div style="margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; width:70%"> | ||
<figure data-ref="1"> | <figure data-ref="1"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/39/T--Slovenia--S.4.8.1.png"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/39/T--Slovenia--S.4.8.1.png"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b> | + | <figcaption><b>LOVpep/ePDZ light inducible system fused to the split firefly |
luciferase.</b><br/></figcaption> | luciferase.</b><br/></figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | + | <p style="clear:both">We tested two orientations of ePDZ (ePDZ fused to split luciferase | |
− | <p>As | + | to N- or C-terminus) and ratios of the constructs ePDZ vs. cLuc:LOVpep were tested (<ref>2</ref>B). |
− | ePDZ domain and a 1:3 ratio of | + | </p> |
− | performed with this | + | <p>As the measured signal was the highest with split luciferase on the N-terminus of the |
+ | ePDZ domain and a 1:3 ratio of LOVpep:ePDZ, all subsequent experiments were | ||
+ | performed with this ratio. An important feature for real life applications is the | ||
ability of the system to be stimulated multiple times. Therefore, repeated | ability of the system to be stimulated multiple times. Therefore, repeated | ||
association | association | ||
− | and dissociation was tested in real time, by adding luciferin to the medium and | + | and dissociation was tested in the real time, by adding luciferin to the medium and |
− | measuring | + | measuring bioluminescence upon induction by light ( |
<ref>2</ref> | <ref>2</ref> | ||
− | C). The system | + | C). The system showed |
a delayed, but successful induction the first time, but the second induction was | a delayed, but successful induction the first time, but the second induction was | ||
− | much weaker. | + | much weaker. The results indicated that the LOVpep/ePDZ system in this setup could |
not be | not be | ||
− | induced more than once, so we decided to test | + | induced more than once, so we decided to test another system. |
</p> | </p> | ||
<div style="float:left; width:100%"> | <div style="float:left; width:100%"> | ||
<figure data-ref="2"> | <figure data-ref="2"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/59/T--Slovenia--4.9.1.png"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/59/T--Slovenia--4.9.1.png"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>LOVpep/ePDZ photoreceptors linked to | + | <figcaption><b>LOVpep/ePDZ photoreceptors linked to split luciferase |
reporter.</b><br/> | reporter.</b><br/> | ||
<p style="text-align:justify">(A) Schematic representation of the | <p style="text-align:justify">(A) Schematic representation of the | ||
− | light-inducible interaction between proteins containing | + | light-inducible interaction between proteins containing ePDZ and LOVpep |
domains. (B) Light inducible reporter with split | domains. (B) Light inducible reporter with split | ||
− | luciferase at the N-terminus of | + | luciferase at the N-terminus of ePDZ domain (nLuc:ePDZb) responded to |
− | light more efficiently than ePDZ:nLuc. | + | light more efficiently than ePDZ:nLuc. Schematic representation of |
different arrangements | different arrangements | ||
− | of ePDZ | + | of ePDZ to split firefly luciferase (nLuc). After induction the cells |
transfected with LOVpep/ePDZ reporter system were lysed and | transfected with LOVpep/ePDZ reporter system were lysed and | ||
− | + | bioluminescence was measured | |
− | with | + | with dual luciferase assay. (D) LOVpep/ePDZ reporter reacted to light |
only once. Following the addition of luciferin to the medium the cells | only once. Following the addition of luciferin to the medium the cells | ||
− | were induced | + | were induced and |
left in the dark for indicated periods. | left in the dark for indicated periods. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 243: | Line 248: | ||
<p>As it has previously been shown on the example of split Cre recombinase | <p>As it has previously been shown on the example of split Cre recombinase | ||
<x-ref>Kennedy2010</x-ref> | <x-ref>Kennedy2010</x-ref> | ||
− | the CRY2 | + | the CRY2-CIB1 interaction seems to be a suitable tool for the |
reconstitution of split proteins, allowing for spatial, temporal and dose-dependent | reconstitution of split proteins, allowing for spatial, temporal and dose-dependent | ||
− | optical control of protein dimerization. | + | optical control of protein dimerization. CRY2 system has also been sued before at |
iGEM: | iGEM: | ||
<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Duke/Project">Duke 2012</a>, <a | <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Duke/Project">Duke 2012</a>, <a | ||
Line 259: | Line 264: | ||
<div class="content"> | <div class="content"> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | CRY2 is a cryptochrome, originating from | + | CRY2 is a cryptochrome, originating from Arabidopsis thaliana and is a blue |
light–absorbing photosensor that binds a helix-loop-helix DNA-binding | light–absorbing photosensor that binds a helix-loop-helix DNA-binding | ||
protein CIB1 in | protein CIB1 in | ||
Line 301: | Line 306: | ||
<figure data-ref="4"> | <figure data-ref="4"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/76/T--Slovenia--4.9.2.png"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/76/T--Slovenia--4.9.2.png"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b>CRY2PHR/CIBN light inducible receptor | + | <figcaption><b>CRY2PHR/CIBN light inducible receptor linked with split |
− | luciferase responded to light | + | luciferase repeatedly responded to light.</b><br/> |
− | <p style="text-align:justify">(A) Response to light depended on | + | <p style="text-align:justify">(A) Response to light depended on |
− | + | concentration of CIBN:cLuc. After induction the cells transfected with | |
− | + | CIBN:cLuc and CRY2PHR:nLuc were lysed and bioluminescence was measured | |
− | with | + | with dual luciferase assay. |
(B) CRY2PHR light reporter was induced repeatedly. Following the | (B) CRY2PHR light reporter was induced repeatedly. Following the | ||
− | addition of luciferin to the medium | + | addition of luciferin to the medium of the cells transfected with |
− | + | CIBN:cLuc and CRY2PHR:nLuc | |
− | (ratio 1:3) were induced | + | (ratio 1:3) were induced and left in the dark for indicated periods. |
</p> | </p> | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <p>As | + | <p>As the measured signal was the highest with a 1:3 ratio of CRY2PHR/CIBN ( |
<ref>4</ref> | <ref>4</ref> | ||
A), all subsequent experiments were performed with this ratio. Next we tested if | A), all subsequent experiments were performed with this ratio. Next we tested if | ||
− | this system could be induced repeatedly in real time. The CRY2PHR/CIBN system | + | this system could be induced repeatedly in real time. The CRY2PHR/CIBN system shows |
− | maximum activity after 2 minutes of induction | + | maximum activity after 2 minutes of induction, returns to background in 10 minutes |
after | after | ||
− | the stimulus | + | the stimulus is removed, and can be induced repeatedly ( |
<ref>4</ref> | <ref>4</ref> | ||
B). | B). | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | + | ||
+ | <div style="float:left; width:100%"> | ||
+ | <figure data-ref="5"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/92/T--Slovenia--4.9.3.png"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/92/T--Slovenia--4.9.3.png"> | ||
− | <figcaption><b> | + | <figcaption><b>Testing CRY2PHR/CIBN light-inducible system with split |
− | <p style="text-align:justify">(A) Schematic representation of | + | protease.</b><br/> |
− | ratio of plasmids coding for CRY2PHR:CIBN with split | + | <p style="text-align:justify">(A) Schematic representation of CRY2PHR/CINB |
− | + | light-inducible system with split protease linked to cyclic luciferase | |
− | + | reporter. Cells were transfected with 1:3 | |
+ | ratio of plasmids coding for CRY2PHR:CIBN with split TEVp (B) or split | ||
+ | PPVp protease (C). The system was tested with the corresponding cyclic | ||
+ | reporter | ||
+ | (red bars), while orthogonality was tested with mismatched cyclic | ||
+ | reporter (white bars). After indicated periods of induction the cells | ||
+ | were lysed and | ||
+ | bioluminescence was measured with dual luciferase assay. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
Line 358: | Line 372: | ||
<div style="float:left; width:100%"><span class="section colorize" id="cleavable luciferase"></span> | <div style="float:left; width:100%"><span class="section colorize" id="cleavable luciferase"></span> | ||
− | + | <figure data-ref="6"> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | <figure data-ref="6"> | + | |
<img | <img | ||
src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/44/T--Slovenia--4.9.4.png"> | src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/44/T--Slovenia--4.9.4.png"> |
Revision as of 13:53, 19 October 2016
nbsp;Light-dependent input signal and proteases - in progress TL
In the recent years, light has been extensively explored as a trigger signal for activation of different biological processes. Small molecules and other chemical signals lack spatial resolution and their temporal resolution is limited by the time required for the cell permeation. In comparison, induction by light as developed by the optogenetics offers many advantages. It is fast as well as inexpensive and allows for excellent spatial, temporal and dose-dependent control.
There is a plethora of various light inducible systems available; however, not
many are applicable to our purpose. Red light induced systems like Phy/PIF
require an
additional phytochrome
Initially we decided to test the LOVpep/ePDZ system. This system has been used
previously at iGEM, by
EPF_Lausanne 2009,
Rutgers 2011 and Rutgers 2012
and in mammalian cells by Freiburg_2014.
As LOV2 is a small photosensory domain from Avena sativa
phototropin 1 with a C-terminal Jα helix. The Jα helix is caged in darkness but unfolds
upon blue light (< 500 nm) photoexcitation, which is crucial for phototropin
signaling.
A photosensor has been prepared by engineering the AsLOV2 domain to contain a
peptide epitope SSADTWV on the C-terminus of the Jα helix (LOVpep), binding an
engineered
Erbin PDZ domain (ePDZ) upon blue light stimulation
nbsp;Results
LOVpep and ePDZb
For initial testing and characterization of the system, we fused the LOVpep and ePDZb
We tested two orientations of ePDZ (ePDZ fused to split luciferase to N- or C-terminus) and ratios of the constructs ePDZ vs. cLuc:LOVpep were tested (2B).
As the measured signal was the highest with split luciferase on the N-terminus of the ePDZ domain and a 1:3 ratio of LOVpep:ePDZ, all subsequent experiments were performed with this ratio. An important feature for real life applications is the ability of the system to be stimulated multiple times. Therefore, repeated association and dissociation was tested in the real time, by adding luciferin to the medium and measuring bioluminescence upon induction by light ( 2 C). The system showed a delayed, but successful induction the first time, but the second induction was much weaker. The results indicated that the LOVpep/ePDZ system in this setup could not be induced more than once, so we decided to test another system.
CRY2-CIB1
As it has previously been shown on the example of split Cre recombinase
CRY2 is a cryptochrome, originating from Arabidopsis thaliana and is a blue
light–absorbing photosensor that binds a helix-loop-helix DNA-binding
protein CIB1 in
its photoexcited state. In our system, we used the conserved N-terminal
photolyase homology region of CRY2 (CRY2PHR; aa 1-498) that mediates
light-responsiveness and
the truncated version of the CIB1 protein (CIBN; aa 1-170) without the
helix-loop-helix region, which mediates DNA binding
We adapted this system for the reconstitution of split luciferase to create a blue-light sensor, which enables easy characterization for further experiments. The N- and C-terminal split fragments of the firefly luciferase were fused to the C-terminus of the CRY2PHR and the CIBN proteins, since this topology has previously been shown to work with the Cre recombinase.
As the measured signal was the highest with a 1:3 ratio of CRY2PHR/CIBN ( 4 A), all subsequent experiments were performed with this ratio. Next we tested if this system could be induced repeatedly in real time. The CRY2PHR/CIBN system shows maximum activity after 2 minutes of induction, returns to background in 10 minutes after the stimulus is removed, and can be induced repeatedly ( 4 B).
Light inducible protease
To implement light as one of the input signals for protease-based signaling pathway or logic functions, we fused the CRY2PHR and the CIBN domains to the N- and C-terminal split domains of 3 different proteases (TEVp, TEVpE and PPVp) ( 5 A) and tested their activity and orthogonality with bioluminescence assays ( 5 B) and western blotting ( 5 C). The bioluminescence assay was based on the split firefly luciferase with cleavage site for either TEVp, TEVpE or PPVp. Cleavage of this reporter results in the luciferase activity reconstitution and thus an increase in the luminescence.
The reporter used for the western blot analysis was the luciferase reporter with the appropriate cleavage substrate inserted at a permissible site and an AU1 tag at the N-terminal. Uncleaved luciferase appears as a single band on a western blot, while partial cleavage of luciferase results in two bands (uncleaved at 65 kDa and cleaved at 55 kDa) and complete cleavage results in only the smaller band ( 6 ). We showed that substrates carrying specific target peptide for proteases were cleaved after induction of split protease reporters.
Both methods showed a successful, fast and dose-dependent response. This is the first time split TEV protease has been shown to work as a light inducible system. Also this is the first time TEVpE and PPVp were prepared as split proteins and shown to function in an inducible system.