Line 176: | Line 176: | ||
that are produced in bacteria. Bacterial gas vesicles have been used as contrasting agents for ultrasonography in animals <x-ref>Shapiro2014</x-ref>. This demonstrated | that are produced in bacteria. Bacterial gas vesicles have been used as contrasting agents for ultrasonography in animals <x-ref>Shapiro2014</x-ref>. This demonstrated | ||
that ultrasound can have effect on gas vesicles. However adding bacterial gas vesicles instead of microbubbles would not solve the problem. The best solution would be | that ultrasound can have effect on gas vesicles. However adding bacterial gas vesicles instead of microbubbles would not solve the problem. The best solution would be | ||
− | if the gas vesicles could be produced in the functional form in mammalian cells. Several iGEM teams have previously used gas vesicles expressed in bacteria, where | + | if the gas vesicles could be produced in the functional form in mammalian cells. Several iGEM teams have previously used gas vesicles expressed in bacteria, |
+ | (<a href="https://2007.igem.org/wiki/index.php/Melbourne/Gas_vesicles">Melbourne 2007</a>, <a href="https://2009.igem.org/Team:Groningen/Project/Vesicle">Groningen 2009 | ||
+ | </a>, <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:University_College_London/Module_4">UCL2012</a>, <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Glasgow/Project/Measurements/Gas_Vesicles"> | ||
+ | Glasgow2014</a>) where typically a large gene cluster had to be expressed to obtain gas vesicles. | ||
+ | However iGEM team <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:OUC-China">OUC-China 2012</a> demonstrated | ||
that only two protein components were sufficient to prepare functional gas vesicles in <i>E.coli</i>. Since gas vesicles are compressible their size should vary with | that only two protein components were sufficient to prepare functional gas vesicles in <i>E.coli</i>. Since gas vesicles are compressible their size should vary with | ||
pressure variations in the ultrasound or by mechanical stimulus, which would strongly influence the cytoskeleton or cell membrane. Therefore, they would likely amplify | pressure variations in the ultrasound or by mechanical stimulus, which would strongly influence the cytoskeleton or cell membrane. Therefore, they would likely amplify |
Revision as of 14:35, 19 October 2016
Enhanced mechanosensitivity by gas vesicles expressed in mammalian cells
For activation of mechanoreceptors TRPC1 or MscS, a high-power ultrasound wave (900 Vpp) is required. Our aim was to improve responsiveness of cells to respond to the lower power of ultrasound as this would increase the selectivity, avoiding stimulation of endogenous channels and prevent cell damage. We decided to test gas-filled lipid microbubbles, since it has been reported that microbubbles can amplify the ultrasonic signal
Microbubbles are small gas-filled lipid vesicles which are used as contrast agents in medicine. Their size is in the range of micrometers. They work by resonating in an ultrasound beam, rapidly contracting and expanding in response to the pressure changes of the sound wave
Results
Lipid microbubbles
Properties of microbubbles for example rigidity, are affected by the composition of the lipid membrane and the gas core. We prepared our lipid microbubbles from a mixture of DSPC:DSPE. Before sonication we added gas perfluorohexane (as described in the Protocols section), which facilitates compression and expansion of the microbubbles upon ultrasound stimulation (3.3.1.A). A heterogeneous mixture of microbubbles in the range from 5 to 100 µm in size were generated by this procedure (3.3.1.B). Microbubbles are most effective in the size range corresponding to the resonance frequency of the ultrasound. However, care has to be taken in the applied energy to prevent cavitation, that can sonoporate cell membranes.
Application of microbubbles to cells expressing mechanosensitive channel MscS significantly improved calcium influx after mechanical stimulation using low-power ultrasound wave (450 Vpp) (3.3.2.). The same experimental setup was used a previusly described in ultrasound stimulation of mechanosensitive channels.
However, there are some drawbacks related to the use of lipid microbubbles, as their delivery requires injection into the selected tissue. Additionally lifetime of lipid microbubbles is limited in the tissue to tens of minutes and they need to be prepared freshly at least once a week.
Gas vesicles
To overcome the described drawback we thought of alternative options. One idea that initially looked too crazy to work was to use genetically encoded gas vesicles
that are produced in bacteria. Bacterial gas vesicles have been used as contrasting agents for ultrasonography in animals
Gas vesicles are stable gas-filled structures, which provide buoyancy in a wide variety of planktonic prokaryotes
HEK293 cells were transfected with plasmids expressing both gas vesicle forming proteins, GvpA and GvpC. We could obtain GvpC from the Registry and added to its characterization, while the plasmid for GvpA could not be recovered and its coding sequence was synthesized using mammalian codon usage. Expression of both proteins was confirmed by the western blot (3.3.3.) and colocalization was observed by confocal microscopy (3.3.4.).
A toxicity test was performed in order to ensure that gas vesicles were not toxic to mammalian cells. 3.3.5. shows that the viability of cells was not altered when expressing gas vesicle forming proteins.
HEK293 cells expressing gas vesicle-forming proteins exhibited increased sensitivity to ultrasound stimulation, even in the absence of exogenous mechanosensitive channels (3.3.6.), which was most likely due to activation of the endogenous mechanosensitive channels in mammalian cells.
In order to maximize the sensitivity of cells to ultrasound, we transfected cells with a combination of mechanosensitive channel MscS and gas vesicle-forming proteins. By decreasing the power of ultrasound stimulation we demonstrated that cells expressing a combination of both ectopic channels and gas vesicles were activated as a result of the ultrasound stimulation (3.3.7.).
To prove that calcium influx was the mediator of activation of mechanosensitive channels, we used an inhibitor of ion channels gadolinium (Gd3+), which has a similar ionic radius, but a higher charge density to Ca2+. By blocking the pore of the channel it acts as an general inhibitor of calcium ion channels
This is the first time demonstration that that gas vesicle-forming proteins can be expressed in human cells and that they improve the sensitivity of mechanosensitive channels for ultrasound. Moreover when the gas vesicle-forming proteins were co-expressed with ectopic ion channels the calcium influx could be achieved with low-power ultrasound stimulation.
Ultrasound is a type of mechanical stimulus, therefore we reasoned that cells might exhibit response also to other types of stimulus such as the touch. The next task was to couple the response of mechanosensitive channels to the mediator of signaling or to the genetically encoded reporter. Mediator of this activation are Ca2+ ions, which are sensed by different cellular proteins and which have been in the literature detected by several designed sensors. The mechanosensing device was then coupled to the calcium split luciferase reporter based on M13 and calmodulin or can be coupled to the protease split system and response of cells was determined against mechanical stimulus in a Touchpaint implementation.