Team:Sheffield/project/science/growthcurves
|
GROWTH CURVES |
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction and Aims
Our proposed reporter system required an E. coli strain that allows the manipulation of intracellular iron levels via siderophore uptake. We chose to use the JC28 strain that has an entC knockout mutation meaning that it is unable to produce siderophores. In order to keep intracellular iron-levels of JC28 low while the strain still grows required to test a range of media and varying iron concentrations.
We carried out growth curve experiments to form an understanding of the growth model of both the W3110 (wildtype) and JC28 (mutant) E. coli strains.
In order to do this we cultured the wildtype and mutant strains and measured the growth of the cultures both indirectly, by measuring optical density (fig 1.), and directly, by counting the number of colony forming units (CFU) plated on agar plates (fig 2.).
The bacteria were grown in three different growth media; Lysogeny broth (LB), M9 minimal media and EZ defined media. This was necessary because we wanted to characterise the growth of our mutant over a range of iron conditions. It was hypothesised that the mutant would grow nearly as well as the wildtype when iron is plentiful and it would not have to rely on siderophores for iron uptake, but would be significantly limited by low-iron conditions.
The growth curves behaving as predicted would confirm that our mutant is impaired in iron acquisition, which is to be expected if the mutant is unable to produce siderophores.
LB liquid media
It was hypothesised that when both strains were grown in the LB liquid media there would be very little difference in the growth curves. This was expected due to the LB media containing a good source of iron, ensuring that iron availability is not a limiting factor to growth. As predicted, there is only a slight difference in the growth curves of the two strains cultured in LB liquid media.
1 ml from an overnight culture of W3110 and JC28 was diluted into 50 ml of fresh LB media at an OD600 of around 0.01 and incubated at 37 °C and 200 rpm. Growth kinetics were monitored taking the OD 600 in 30 min intervals from the time of inoculation using 1 ml samples (see Fig.1).
CFU counts were performed from the same growth curve experiment. 1 ml samples were taken at 30 min intervals and 3x 10 µl of dilutions from 10-1 to 10-6 were spotted on a LB agar plate ad incubated at 37 °C overnight. The average CFU of these spots were taken for each dilution (Fig. 2).
As predicted, only slight differences in growth between both strains were observed in liquid LB media (Fig. 1 and 2). Interestingly, at the same time point (T4.5) the size of the mutant JC28 colonies were significantly smaller than the wildtype W3110 colonies (Figures 3 and 4).
Figure 1. Growth curves of E. coli W3110 (wildtype) and JC28 (mutant) in liquid LB media.
Figure 2. CFU counts of W3110 (wildtype) and JC28 (mutant) grown in liquid LB media.
Figure 3. Comparison of wildtype and mutant colony sizes from T4.5
M9 media
We measured the growth of W3110 and JC28 in M9 minimal media with a range of added iron concentrations. It was hypothesised that JC28 would grow at a similar rate to W3110 in the high-iron media, but be unable to grow as rapidly in low-iron media.
While W3110 was able to grow, no significant growth of JC28 was observed after 5 hours at any of the tested iron concentrations. This experiment showed that M9 media was missing some nutrients that JC28 requires, leading us to investigate a richer defined medium where we could still control the level of iron.
Defined media
< img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d5/T--Sheffield--Growth-graph2.png">The growth curves in defined media show that wildtype W3110 is not significantly affected by the varying iron concentrations we tested. However, JC28 demonstrated significantly reduced growth when grown under iron-limited conditions. This shows that JC28 is deficient in iron uptake.
