Team:Paris Bettencourt/Project/Microbiology
Goals
- To screen soil samples from around the world for microbes that naturally degrade anthocyanin.
- To identify enzymes linked to the most efficient anthocyanin eaters.
Results
- We managed to isolate species from all around the world through iGEM collaborations.
- 186 bacteria were tested for quercetin degradation.
- A 186 bacterial database was built and characterized.
- A phylogenetic tree of 174 different bacterial species was created .
- 3 bacterias were shown able to degrade anthocyanin
- Common candidate genes were selected through genome sequencing of 4 different bacterial strains.
Methods
- Microbiota cultivation
- Anthocyanin purification
- Anthocyanin & Quercitin Measurement
- 16S rRNA sequencing
- Whole genome sequencing
- Phylogenetic analysis
Abstract
Anthocyanins, the key pigments found in red wine, are abundant in grapes, berries, flowers and many plants. Like all naturally ocurring metabolites, they eventually biodegrade and re-enter the carbon cycle. In this project, we search nature for enzymatic pathways that can break down anthocyanins into simpler, unpigmented molecules. We reasoned that microbes living in the soil near vineyards were likely to catabolize and consume anthocyanin. Therefore we collected soil samples from 10 vinyards around France, Europe and the world, notably with the help of our fellow iGEM teams. In total we isolated 186 strains through selective and non-selective plating on different media. All of the strains were identified by 16s rRNA sequencing, then characterized for their ability to degrade quercitin, a compound structurally similar to anthocyanin. By phylogenetic analysis, we were able to connect quercitin degradation to specific bacterial phyla and genus including Micrococcus, Pseudomonas, Lysinibacillus and Oerskovia. The most effective strains were further characterized by whole genome sequencing to identify enzymes linked to natural quercitin degradation. By bioprospecting with the help of the worldwide iGEM community, we were able to find the best stain fighting enzymes that nature has to offer.
Motivation and Background
Bioprospecting and Bioremediation
Bioprospecting is the process of searching nature for genetic information that can be adapted in useful or profitable ways. In recent years, bioprospecting efforts have focused on the search for small molecule pharmaceuticals and other bioactive compounds (Müller, 2016). Bioremediation is the use of living organisms to remove environmental toxins from contaminated areas. Microbes in particular are well known for their ability to degrade organic pollutants like petroleum, pesticides and phenolic compounds. Bioremediation has always been a popular topic in iGEM, producing many notable projects with diverse organisms and applications.
| Team | Year | Project |
|---|---|---|
| Leicester | 2012 | Polystyrene Biodegradation |
| UCL | 2012 | Plastic Republic |
| TU-Munich | 2013 | PhyscoFilter |
| IIT Delhi | 2014 | Oxide Decontamination |
| NEFU China | 2014 | Cadmium Decontamination |
Table 1. Previous iGEM projects using bio-remediation approaches.
Anthocyanin is not harmful, but in the context of a stain it is unwanted and so could be considered a target for bioremediation. Therefore a mechanism to degrade anthcyanin could be revealed with a classic bioremediation strategy :
- Select organisms from a contaminated environment, where enzymatic decontamination may have naturally evolved.
- Isolate pure strains and measure their activity.
- Connect the activity to specific pathways using molecular genetics.
Anthocyanidin and Quercitin
In these experiments, we use quercitin as a chemical proxy for anthocyanins. Naturally occurring anthocyanidins are chemically diverse derivatives of a a core flayvlium cation. Plant sources of anthocyanidin carry a range of anthocyanidin pigments substituted at any of up to seven positions, with the relative concentrations contributing to a characteristic color. Pure anthocyanidins, like malvidin, are expensive (120 EUR for 1 mg) and do not necessarily represent the full chemical diversity of a natural wine stain. Therefore, in this work we use quercitin, a flavonol, as a structural proxy. Quercitn is cheap (40 EUR for 10 g), stable, and can be quantified by absorbance at 315 nm. In follow up experiments, microbes are tested on real wine and on bulk anthocyanins that we extract directly from grape skins.
Figure 1. Structure and absorbance of malvidin, an anthocyanidin, and quercetin, a flavonol
All flavonoids are structured as two phenyl rings and a heterocyclic ring. Anthocyanin itself is structured as a chromane ring with an aromatic ring on C2. Cyanindin and malvidin comprise 90% of the anthocyanins found in nature. These chemicals differ only in their cyclic B groups, and the chromane ring is well conserved in most flavonoids. Therefore, we theorized that the chromane ring itself presented an ideal target for degradation. Based on these criteria, we chose the flavanol quercetin as our anthocyanin substitute. This molecule differs from anthocyanins only in the presence of a carbonyl group (in4?). Additionally, quercetin is present in wine, and contributes to its color. Thus, even in the case where enzymes are isolated that break down quercetin and not anthocyanin, the possibility exists of reducing the color or intensity of wine stains. Finally, co-pigmentation chemical interactions occur between anthocyanin and quercetin, increasing wine color stability, mainly through π-π stacking between their phenolic cycles. Thus, it leads to the possibility that quercetin degradation could also impact anthocyanin stability.
Results
Collection of the soil samples
Soil samples were collected from France, Spain, Croatia, Namibia and Australia. Samples from the Paris region were collected by members of our team. Other samples were sent by friends, family members, and collaborating iGEM teams. Soil samples were declared to French customs authorities with a Facture Proforma, printed out by the sample donor and included in the shipment.
Upon arrival, samples were washed gently with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, then left to stand, allowing large particles to settle. The resulting eluate was diluted further with PBS then used directly as a source of soil microbes.
| Country | Location | Collector |
|---|---|---|
| France | Clos Monmartre Vineyard, Paris | Our Team |
| France | Cochin Port Royal, Paris | Our team |
| France | Vaucluse region’s vineyard | INSA-Lyon iGEM team |
| Spain | Barcelona | UPF-CRG Barcelona iGEM team |
| Spain | Utiel Requena | UPV Valencia iGEM team |
| Australia | Hunter Valley | UNSW |
| Australia | Sydney | Macquarie 2016 iGEM team |
| Namibia | Etosha National Park | Our team |
| Algeria | Alger | Our team |
| Croatia | Kricke | Our team |
| Israel | Jerusalem | Our team |
Table 2 and Figure 2. Location of soil samples
collected or obtained by the team.
Preparation of the microbe library
For safety and to avoid environmental contamination, microbial isolation was performed in a fume hood in a BSL 2 facility. More safety information in provided on our safety page.
Microbes were isolated from soil samples using either selective or nonselective plating. In nonselective plating, TSA (Trypic Soy Agar), LBA (Luria Broth Agar), M9 agar Glucose were used. In selective plating, M9 agar quercetin plate (1g/L), in which quercitin was the only supplied carbon source, were used. Soil eluate was serially diluted and plated on rather selective or nonselective media in order to have a maximum of diversity of strains. The purpose of selective plating was to enrich for microbes with the ability to metabolize quercitin.
The resulting culture was incubated at 30 C for 48 hours, then re-streaked to eliminate potential contamination.
Single colonies were then isolated. To maximize the library diversity, we preferentially chose colonies with unique morphology and we took no more than 5 clones from a single soil sample.
After isolation, we performed colony PCR with universal 16s rRNA primers (see methods). Sequencing the resulting PCR products allowed us to identify the strains and position them within the greater bacterial taxonomy.
Figure 3. Quercitin degradation by 189 microbes collected from global soil samples Single colonies were inoculated in M9 minimal medium and grown for 6 days. Quercitin was measured by absorbance. Strains to the extreme left of the figure represent the highest-degrading strains.
Figure 4. Quercitin degradation detail The top-performing strains included those isolated from both selective and nonselective media. Strains marked with an asterisk were selected for further investigation.
Quanitification of quercitin degradation
Single colonies from the selective and nonselective microbe libraries were innoculated in Tryptic Soy Broth for an overnight culture.
500µL of overnight culturewere inoculated in a falcon tube with 5ml of 1g/L Quercetin solution with M9 at pH=7.
All cultures were made in triplicates. The tubes were put in the 30°C incubator at 150rpm during 6 days. Because Quercetin is not soluble at pH=7, the shaking was very important to avoid precipitation of this pigment.
We did not used only M9 Quercetin plate to confirm that a strain is able or not to degrade Quercetin because of the following reasons:
- Quercetin plates are very green and it makes the colonies hard to see on it. Only fungi thanks to their mycelium were able to make a white halo on the plate that confirm the degradation of Quercetin.
- Working on liquid media allows to make dilution when the culture contains too much residual carbon source from the soil sample. Also if we were using agar plate, the growth of microbes could also be explain by the use of the agar instead of our single carbon source.
- Most of the time we failed on restriking strains that grew on Quercetin plate after the first inoculation with the soil sample. That means maybe that theses strains were growing on this single carbon plate thanks to some residual carbon from the soil sample. Additional to that, some strains that were not able to grow on Quercetin plate gave some good results with the liquid experiment!
Quercetin absorbance measurement
Quercetin absorbance measurement was made at two different time in the purpose of constructing an histogram linked to the strain database.
The first measure was at Time 0 days, after the inoculation by the soil sample/overnight culture to make sure every falcon tube had the same amount of Quercetin compare to the control.
The last measure was made at Time 6 days, to see the evolution of the Quercetin degradation (see figure X & X).
We made also some kinetic during 6 days with daily sample to compare the ability of Quercetin degradation between the best bacteria (see figure X).
We had for all our experiments a negative control (M9 Quercetin) and a positive control (Pseudomonas putida K2440, known to degrade Quercetin).
Before each time sample, we vortex well the tube to make the solution homogenous. We sample 100µL of a given tube to which we add 900µL of 0.5M NaOH solution to solubilize Quercetin. Then we centrifuge 1min at 6000rpm to make the cell precipitate (we don’t them to interfere in the absorbance measurement). 6000rpm shows to be the best speed for centrifugation to avoid pigment precipitation or not enough cell precipitation. Then we sample 20µL of the previous sample that we now put into a 96 well plate for Tecan. We fill then with 180µL of the same NaOH solution. We know have made a hundred time dilution, and we are ready to measure the absorbance at 315nm.
Figure 5. Kinetics of quercetin degradation by 9 promising strains. This experiment had two negative controls, one with no bacteria (black line) and one with non-quercetin degrading E. coli. Pseudomonas putita was included as a positive control. Four strains, shown in bold, degraded quercetin at a higher rate than our P. putida control.
Both selective an nonselective plating methods were able to produce quercitin-degrading strains. 4 of the 5 strains showing the most quercitin degradation were obtained by selective plating. However, 40 of the 50 strains showing significant degradation were obtained by nonselective plating.
Phylogenetic analysis of quercitin degradation
Figure X: Phylogenetic Tree of isolated strains. We constructed a phylogenetic tree of all isolated bacterial strains. Strain taxonomic classification is indicated by the color key to the left of the figure. Strains that demonstrated high quercetin degradation are marked with an asterisk. Those strains marked with a large star were selected for whole genome sequencing to look for common anthocyanin-degrading genes.
Figure X: Genome table.
Anthocyanin Extraction and analysis
Anthocyanin were extracted from Vinis vitifera fruits by ethanol maceration. We confirmed the presence of anthocyanin into our extract with Lee method (Lee et Al. 2005). Thanks to our collaboration with Evry iGEM Team, we also confirmed the presence of anthocyanin by HPLC. Pseudomonas kugensii, Stentrophomonas maltophilia and Oerskovia turbat were isolated from an M9 anthocyanin enriched media inoculate with a soil sample from Montmartre. We observed a diminution of the 525nm absorbance with TECAN, which is linked with the degradation of anthocyanin. This degradation was also observed by Evry Team with Pseudomonas putida by HPLC.
Methods
Anthocyanin extraction
Vinis vitifera grapes were our source for anthocyanin extraction.
Grapes were peeled and the skins were collected, washed and soaked overnight in ethanol with 1% HCl.
By trial and error, we determined that 2.5 mL of this solution per 1 g of skins was the best compromise between efficiency and the quantity of solvent used.
The solution was filtered with Whatman paper, with the filtrate collected, and the solvent evaporated at 37°C for several hours.
The dry extract was resuspended in water (10 mL for 1g of grape skin).
Anthocyanin quantification by differential absorbance
Following Lee et al. (2005), we prepared one buffer at pH 1 (0.025M potassium chloride) and a second at pH 4.5 (sodium acetate, 0.4M).
100 µL of the anthocyanin solution was mixed with 900µL of each buffers and the color was allowed to develop over 20 minutes.
Absorbance measurements were obtained at 510 nm and 700 nm for each solution.
Anthocyanin concentration was determined as a function of the four absorbance measurements, using an established formula (Lee et al., 2005).
Protein quantification with Bradford assays
A stock solution of Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) was prepared in water at 1 mg/mL.
100 μL of standard dilutions of BSA solution were mixed with 1 mL of Bradford Reagent and mixed by vortexing.
Absorbance was measured at 595 nm. Experimental samples were treated similarly and compared to the BSA standard curve to determine concentration.
Carbohydrate quantification with Fehling Reaction
200µL of Fehling's A solution, 200µL of Fehling's solution B and 200µL of our carbohydrate solution into sodium acetate buffer (20µL of solution and 180 µL of buffer).
The Fehling reaction is measured as the loss of absorbance at 650nm relative to a blank solution without carbohydrate.
Quantification was achieved by comparison to a standard curve of glucose prepared at 1g/L to 5g/L.
Bacteria plating on selective and non-selective media
1 g of soil samples were suspended in 5 mL Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) then left to stand allowing large particles to settle.
The soil suspension was serially diluted to obtain a suitable density of microbes (typically 1:1000) then 200 µL was plated on standard Petri dishes with M9 agar with 1 g/L quercetin for selection.
Non-selective plating was performed on a range of rich media including FTO agar (Curry, 1976), Mossel agar (Mossel, 1967), standard LB, standard TSA and standard M9 glucose.
Protocol for growth assay in Quercetin M9 liquid media
Following the protocol of Dantas et al. 2012, all step were performed in liquid media to control soil carbon source contamination.
We suspended soil samples in 5 ml M9 with 1g/L quercetin at pH 7 in 50 ml Falcon tubes with 500µL of overnight culture of strains isolated from selective or non-selective plates.
All cultures were made in triplicate at 30°C with shaking at 150 rpm for several days. As quercetin is not soluble at pH=7, shaking important to avoid precipitation.
Quercetin absorbance measurement
Quercetin absorbance was measured at two time points for histogram construction: at 0 days to ensure quercetin sample concentration consistent with the controls, and at 6 days to evaluate quercetin degradation.
M9-quercetin and Pseudomonas putidaK2440 samples were included as negative and positive controls, respectively.
Prior to absorbance measurement, Quercetin was solubilized by diluting samples 10 fold in 0.5M NaOH, centrifuged to remove cell material, and further diluted 100X for measurement at 315 nm in a Tecan plate reader.
PCR for 16s characterization, sequencing interpretation and phylogenetic tree construction.
To identify bacterial strains, 16S rRNA sequences were amplified through colony PCR, column purified, and Sanger sequenced by GATC.
The resulting sequences were submitted for BLAST comparison at ncbi.gov.
Alignments were performed using the Ribosomal Database Project Aligner tool (https://rdp.cme.msu.edu/),
and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using Geneious software with the following parameters: we used Neighbor-Joining tree building with Jukes Cantor as the genetic distance model, with a 93% similarity cost matrix for the alignment with free end gaps.
The tree was then exported and improved using the online Tree of Life software (http://www.tolweb.org/tree/).
PCR for genome sequencing.
We isolated bacterial DNA using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit from Qiagen.
We submitted four strains to GATC for whole genome sequencing: NS.4 (Lysinibacillus), S.48 (Stenothrophomonas maltophilia), S.33 (Oerskovia Paurometabola), NS.33 (Microccocus Luteus) according to their sample preparation specifications.
Attributions
This project was done by Antoine Villa Antoine Poirot and Sébastien Gaultier. Anthocyanin data was obtained by Ibrahim Haouchine.
Thanks to our advisors Jake and Jason for all their help with the figures.
We would like to thank Philippe Morand from the microbiology lab of Cochin for his advice.
References
- Kanekar, P. P., Sarnaik, S. S., & Kelkar, A. S. (1998). Bioremediation of phenol by alkaliphilic bacteria isolated from alkaline lake of Lonar, India. Journal of applied microbiology, 85(S1).
- Dantas, G., Sommer, M. O., Oluwasegun, R. D., & Church, G. M. (2008). Bacteria subsisting on antibiotics. Science, 320(5872), 100-103.
- Lee, J., Durst, R. W., & Wrolstad, R. E. (2005). Determination of total monomeric anthocyanin pigment content of fruit juices, beverages, natural colorants, and wines by the pH differential method: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC international, 88(5), 1269-1278.
- Curry, J. C., & Borovian, G. E. (1976). Selective medium for distinguishing micrococci from staphylococci in the clinical laboratory. Journal of clinical microbiology, 4(5), 455.
- Pillai, B. V., & Swarup, S. (2002). Elucidation of the flavonoid catabolism pathway in Pseudomonas putida PML2 by comparative metabolic profiling. Applied and environmental microbiology, 68(1), 143-151.
- Herrmann, H., Janke, D., Krejsa, S., & Kunze, I. (1987). Involvement of the plasmid pPGH1 in the phenol degradation of Pseudomonas putida strain H. FEMS microbiology letters, 43(2), 133-137.
+33 1 44 41 25 22/25
igem2016parisbettencourt@gmail.com 