| No |
Categories |
Aspects |
| |
|
|
| 1 |
Project |
How impressive is this project? |
| 2 |
Project |
How creative is the team's project? |
| 3 |
Project |
Did the project work? |
| 4 |
Project |
How much did the team accomplish? |
| 5 |
Project |
Is the project likely to have an impact? |
| 6 |
Project |
How well are engineering principles used? |
| 7 |
Project |
How thoughtful and thorough was the team's consideration of human practices? |
| 8 |
Project |
How much of the work did the team do themselves and how much was done by others? |
| |
|
|
| 9 |
Track Specific - Standard Tracks |
Did the team design a project based on synthetic biology and standard parts? |
| 10 |
Track Specific - Standard Tracks |
Are the parts functions and behaviors well-documented in the Registry? |
| |
|
|
| 9 |
Track Specific - Special Tracks |
Did the team design a project based on synthetic biology? |
| 10 |
Track Specific - Special Tracks |
Are the project components (hardware, software, art & design, etc) thoroughly documented on their wiki? |
| |
|
|
| |
Special Prizes |
|
| |
|
|
| 1 |
Wiki |
Do I understand what the team accomplished? |
| 2 |
Wiki |
Is the wiki attractive and easy to navigate? |
| 3 |
Wiki |
Does the team provide convincing evidence to support their conclusions? |
| 4 |
Wiki |
How well does the team describe what they did and what was done by others? |
| 5 |
Wiki |
Will the wiki be a compelling record of the team's project for future teams? |
| |
|
|
| 1 |
Presentation |
Did the presentation flow well? |
| 2 |
Presentation |
How professional is the graphic design in terms of layout and composition? |
| 3 |
Presentation |
Did you find the presentation engaging? |
| 4 |
Presentation |
How competent were the team members at answering questions? |
| |
|
|
| 1 |
Poster |
Did the poster flow well? |
| 2 |
Poster |
How professional is the graphic design in terms of layout and composition? |
| 3 |
Poster |
Did you find the poster appealing? |
| 4 |
Poster |
How competent were the team members at answering questions? |
| |
|
|
| 1 |
Integrated Human Practices |
Was their work integrated into their project? |
| 2 |
Integrated Human Practices |
Does it serve as an inspiring example to others? |
| 3 |
Integrated Human Practices |
Is it documented in a way that others can build upon? |
| 4 |
Integrated Human Practices |
Was it thoughtfully implemented? (did they explain the context, rationale, prior work) |
| |
|
|
| 1 |
Education & Public Engagement |
Did their work establish a dialogue? |
| 2 |
Education & Public Engagement |
Does it serve as an inspiring example to others? |
| 3 |
Education & Public Engagement |
Is it documented in a way that others can build upon? |
| 4 |
Education & Public Engagement |
Was it thoughtfully implemented? (did they explain the context, rationale, prior work) |
| |
|
|
| 1 |
Model |
How impressive is the mathematical modeling? |
| 2 |
Model |
Did the model help the team understand their part or device? |
| 3 |
Model |
Did the team use measurements of the device to develop the model? |
| 4 |
Model |
Does the modeling approach provide a good example for others? |
| |
|
|
| 1 |
Measurement |
Is the measurement potentially repeatable? |
| 2 |
Measurement |
Is the protocol well described? |
| 3 |
Measurement |
Are there web-based support materials? |
| 4 |
Measurement |
Is it useful to other projects? |
| 5 |
Measurement |
Was a standard reference sample included? |
| |
|
|
| 1 |
Entrepreneurship |
Customer Discovery - Has the team interviewed a representative number of potential customers for the technology and clearly communicated what they learned? |
| 2 |
Entrepreneurship |
Based on their interviews, does the team have a clear hypothesis describing their customers' needs? |
| 3 |
Entrepreneurship |
Does the team present a convincing case that their product meets the customers' needs? |
| 4 |
Entrepreneurship |
Has the team demonstrated a minimum viable (MVP) product? And does the team have customers to commit (LOI, etc.) to purchasing it / using it? |
| 5 |
Entrepreneurship |
Does the team have a viable and understood business model/value proposition to take their company to market? |
| |
|
|
| 1 |
Applied Design |
How well did the project address potential applications and implications of synthetic biology? |
| 2 |
Applied Design |
How creative, original, and compelling was the project? |
| 3 |
Applied Design |
How impressive was the project installation in the art & design exhibition space? |
| 4 |
Applied Design |
How well did the team engage in collaboration with people outside of their primary fields? |
| |
|
|
| 1 |
Software Tool |
How well is the software using and supporting existing synthetic biology standards and platforms? |
| 2 |
Software Tool |
Was this software validated by experimental work? |
| 3 |
Software Tool |
Did the team use non-trivial algorithms or designs? |
| 4 |
Software Tool |
How easily can others embed this software in new workflows? |
| 5 |
Software Tool |
How user-friendly is the software? |
| |
|
|
| 1 |
Hardware |
Does the hardware address a need or problem in synthetic biology? |
| 2 |
Hardware |
Did the team conduct user testing and learn from user feedback? |
| 3 |
Hardware |
Did the team demonstrate utility and functionality in their hardware proof of concept? |
| 4 |
Hardware |
Is the documentation of the hardware system sufficient to enable reproduction by other teams? |
| |
|
|
| 1 |
Plant Synthetic Biology |
How impressive was the use of a plant chassis? |
| 2 |
Plant Synthetic Biology |
How impressive was the collection of parts made for the plant chassis? |
| 3 |
Plant Synthetic Biology |
How well did the team use the special attributes of the plant chassis? |
| 4 |
Plant Synthetic Biology |
Are the parts/tools/protocols for plants made during this project useful to other teams? |
| |
|
|
| 1 |
New Basic Part |
How does the documentation compare to BBa_K863006 and BBa_K863001? |
| 2 |
New Basic Part |
How new/innovative is it? |
| 3 |
New Basic Part |
Did the team show the part works as expected? |
| 4 |
New Basic Part |
Is it useful to the community? |
| |
|
|
| 1 |
New Composite Part |
How does the documentation compare to BBa_K404122 and BBa_K863005? |
| 2 |
New Composite Part |
How new/innovative is it? |
| 3 |
New Composite Part |
Did the team show the part works as expected? |
| 4 |
New Composite Part |
Is it useful to the community? |
| |
|
|
| 1 |
Part Collection |
Is this collection a coherent group of parts meant to be used as a collection, or just a list of all the parts the team made? |
| 2 |
Part Collection |
How does the documentation compare to BBa_K747000 and BBa_K525710? |
| 3 |
Part Collection |
Did the team submit an internally complete collection allowing it to be used without any further manipulation or parts from outside Registry? |
| 4 |
Part Collection |
Did the team finish building a functional system using this collection? |
| 5 |
Part Collection |
Did the team create excellent documentation to allow future use of this collection? |
| |
|
|
