Difference between revisions of "Team:Austin UTexas/Results"

Line 232: Line 232:
 
[[File:T--Austin_UTexas--Cpx_pH_Culture_Tubes_2.png|thumb|right|500px| Figure 1. Testing the CpxR Construct in pH 6-9. From left to right is Control pH 6-9 and then Experimental pH 6-9. These are showing the gradient change in expression accordingly with the change of pH due to a pH-dependent promotor compared to consistent expression accordingly with a promoter that is always "on".]]
 
[[File:T--Austin_UTexas--Cpx_pH_Culture_Tubes_2.png|thumb|right|500px| Figure 1. Testing the CpxR Construct in pH 6-9. From left to right is Control pH 6-9 and then Experimental pH 6-9. These are showing the gradient change in expression accordingly with the change of pH due to a pH-dependent promotor compared to consistent expression accordingly with a promoter that is always "on".]]
 
<html>
 
<html>
<p>The order from left to right is control pH 6-9 and then Experimental pH 6-9. These are showing the gradient change in expression accordingly with the change of pH due to a pH-dependent promotor compared to consistent expression accordingly with a promoter that is always "on". The main point is that the Control at pH 6 has more expression of the yellow-green chromoprotein than the Experimental at pH 6. The pH-Dependent promoter of the Experimental group is down-regulated at pH 6 whereas the control is not. Also, there is an increase in YGCP expression between the Experiment pH 7 and pH 8 that is not seen in the Control between pH 7 and pH 8. The normalized data is below shows the relative expression of YGCP. The construct can be found on the iGEM registry as: <a href=“http://parts.igem.org/Part:Bba_K2097000”>BBa_K2097000</a>.</p>
+
<p>The order from left to right in figure 1 is control pH 6-9 and then Experimental pH 6-9. These are showing the gradient change in expression accordingly with the change of pH due to a pH-dependent promotor compared to consistent expression accordingly with a promoter that is always "on". The main point is that the Control at pH 6 has more expression of the yellow-green chromoprotein than the Experimental at pH 6. The pH-Dependent promoter of the Experimental group is down-regulated at pH 6 whereas the control is not. Also, there is an increase in YGCP expression between the Experiment pH 7 and pH 8 that is not seen in the Control between pH 7 and pH 8. The normalized data in figure 2 shows the relative expression of YGCP. The construct can be found on the iGEM registry as: <a href=“http://parts.igem.org/Part:Bba_K2097000”>BBa_K2097000</a>.</p>
 
</html>
 
</html>
  

Revision as of 07:31, 18 October 2016

Austin_UTexas

Results


Click on one of the images below to learn more about our results!




Kombucha Strains

Conjugation

Recapitulation

Ethanol

pH Sensors